• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

How much can you port AFR 185's?

  • Thread starter Thread starter silverstangman
  • Start date Start date Jul 20, 2005

silverstangman

New Member
Mar 26, 2003
413
0
0
Eastern NC
Jul 20, 2005
#1
  • Jul 20, 2005
  • #1
I'm doing a 347 buildup with nitrous shortly and am curious as to how much a machineshop can really do to a set of 185's? i will also be running a edelbrock rpm 2 upper and lower with a custom cam. any help would be great.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Jul 20, 2005
#2
  • Jul 20, 2005
  • #2
Since the 185's are already CNC'd, I doubt you could take them past 210cc.

Either way, it's not worth it to get them ported. If you want to port the 185's, set up to the 205 head - the amount you'd be spending to get the 185 head to 205cc wouldn't be justifiable.

Joe
 

silverstangman

New Member
Mar 26, 2003
413
0
0
Eastern NC
Jul 20, 2005
#3
  • Jul 20, 2005
  • #3
i had heard that the 205's are more for 351's and bigger cui motors than the 347. i was just wondering if their is anything that would need to be cleaned up a little bit better or anything.
 

bjl95mustang

Founding Member
Jan 18, 2000
1,495
0
36
Austin,TX
Jul 20, 2005
#4
  • Jul 20, 2005
  • #4
I thought it's not a good idea to port the afr heads due to the special port design. This is only what I have heard so i could be wrong.
 

mytight95

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,605
0
46
Dothan,Al
Jul 20, 2005
#5
  • Jul 20, 2005
  • #5
as stated on this website before.....setup your motor best for n/a... and then add the spray...

those 185's should be plenty of head for a 347 if you aren't going extreme. IMO, as i have been researching a lot on heads etc. lately...


jason
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Jul 20, 2005
#6
  • Jul 20, 2005
  • #6
Go bigger, I say rock the 205s ANYWAY. I've always heard that AFR's are "perfect" out of the box and that you shouldn't fool with them. If you're getting a custom cam then your grinder definately should be able to account for the 205s flow... hell while you're at it, snag a Vic Jr. intake instead of the RPMII and build a monster. Its not too much more.
 

mytight95

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,605
0
46
Dothan,Al
Jul 20, 2005
#7
  • Jul 20, 2005
  • #7
that wold be a vicious combo with the cam made for that intake and heads, and the tune it would require.....


go for it.... if the pocketbook permits....


jason
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Jul 20, 2005
#8
  • Jul 20, 2005
  • #8
mytight95 said:
that wold be a vicious combo with the cam made for that intake and heads, and the tune it would require.....


go for it.... if the pocketbook permits....


jason
Click to expand...
WITHOUT A DOUBT. i think people on here are guilty of not going big enough some times and i say that a 347 could handle a 205cc intake runner. after all a lt1 chevy motor is a 350 and afr sells a street/strip 205 for it so why the hell not.
 

silverstangman

New Member
Mar 26, 2003
413
0
0
Eastern NC
Jul 22, 2005
#9
  • Jul 22, 2005
  • #9
im not trying to get into debt here but i do want a solid running motor. i want it to be a little bit streetable, like to and from the track and drive it once or twice a month to work. i dont care about gas mileage as i have the v6 for the daily driver. wouldn't running the 205's really call for a bigger cam? im not gonna go overkill with the cam as the motor will have nitrous. how much diff is there between the vic jr and the rpm 2? i thought the rpm 2 was pretty much designed for 347 cui or thereabout size motors? i am gonna keep it fuel injected as well. how hard would the tune be on it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
734
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
new :poo: box, may need to hit you guys up for 79-82 info when i fix thIs turd.
  • rednotch
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?