• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

how much do 4.10's differ from 3.73's?

  • Thread starter Thread starter #1stangFAN
  • Start date Start date May 29, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
1

#1stangFAN

New Member
Mar 30, 2009
106
0
0
May 29, 2009
#1
  • May 29, 2009
  • #1
Im trying to decide on gears and i know this probably gets posted a lot but i had a question that doesnt pop up TOO often. How much does 4.10's differ from 3.73's in MPG? it would be ideal to get someone with both 4.10's and 3.73's to post thier MPG in the city and highway but i would appreciate it if anyone with these ratios post thier MPG. and i've also taken into consideration 3.90's but i never hear anything good or bad about them so i think i might stay away from them.

And a little more backround information, I get on the highway very seldomly maybe once every couple weeks and only for like 10 miles. So i was leaning more towards the 4.10's but everyone says 3.73's are great for a DD.
 

ct07gt

Member
Feb 14, 2008
377
0
16
May 29, 2009
#2
  • May 29, 2009
  • #2
It would be very difficult to use a comparision between 2 different cars with the 4.10s and 3.73s. The cars would most likely have different modifications, definitely have different driving styles, and different commutes. However you can calculate the difference in RPM between the two. I don't know if you have 3.55 or 3.31 gears, but if you have 3.55 gears and want to go to 4.10, take your rpm at a set speed, divide it by 3.55 and multiply it by 4.1. If you have 3.55 gears, then it would not be worth it to make the small jump to 3.73s. I think the reason most avoid 3.90 gears is that Motive makes them and some have had problems with Motives whining. I think most people are very happy with 4.10 gears.
 
1

#1stangFAN

New Member
Mar 30, 2009
106
0
0
May 29, 2009
#3
  • May 29, 2009
  • #3
i have an auto, pretty sure 3.31
 

Casey4s

New Member
Sep 1, 2007
147
0
0
Woodbridge, VA
May 29, 2009
#4
  • May 29, 2009
  • #4
I am on my 3:rd set of 4:10's, and I can't get rid of the whine. only paid labor and parts for one, the shop really tried to please me but they all seem to whine at least in my car. The first two sets were FRPP gears and they were really noisy. The ones I ahve now are Youkon which are actually 4:11, and they are better but still whine too much for me. I would hate to give up the acceleration you gain with the 4:10/11 gears.
 

ct07gt

Member
Feb 14, 2008
377
0
16
May 29, 2009
#5
  • May 29, 2009
  • #5
#1stangFAN said:
i have an auto, pretty sure 3.31
Click to expand...

Yup, autos are all 3.31, so a 3.73 would be worthwhile for you. It sucks that Casey4s is having problems with his, but most people are happy with them, especially the FRPP ones.
 
T

TestMe

New Member
Jan 14, 2009
28
0
1
Lubbock TX
May 29, 2009
#6
  • May 29, 2009
  • #6
I had 3.55s in mine and switched to 4.10s and love em. Absolutely no whining at all and the gas really isnt that bad, maybe a little worse but that is only if you have a lead foot all the time. 4.10s all the way
 
1

#1stangFAN

New Member
Mar 30, 2009
106
0
0
May 30, 2009
#7
  • May 30, 2009
  • #7
ct07gt said:
Yup, autos are all 3.31, so a 3.73 would be worthwhile for you. It sucks that Casey4s is having problems with his, but most people are happy with them, especially the FRPP ones.
Click to expand...

i know switching to 3.73's would be worth while, but would it be even more worth while if i got the 4.10's?
 
2

2007Vert

New Member
May 12, 2009
3
0
0
Ohio
May 30, 2009
#8
  • May 30, 2009
  • #8
Look at the tag on your rear end. It will tell you what gear ratio you have. Go for the FRPP 4.10a gears. Any whining you get is due to a bad install not the gears.
 
T

TheVat

New Member
Feb 12, 2009
98
0
0
So California
May 30, 2009
#9
  • May 30, 2009
  • #9
I have the stock 3.31's, man trans, susp and tires (17's). If I went 4.10 or 3.73, I'd assume traction from a dig would leave me spinning in first and second. You have an auto, but still if you get some wider tires, better suspension, the 4.10's would be good.
 

Casey4s

New Member
Sep 1, 2007
147
0
0
Woodbridge, VA
May 30, 2009
#10
  • May 30, 2009
  • #10
2007Vert said:
Look at the tag on your rear end. It will tell you what gear ratio you have. Go for the FRPP 4.10a gears. Any whining you get is due to a bad install not the gears.
Click to expand...

I totaly agree, I think the tech that did the installs on my car has done something wrong. I need to just lose the money and go to another installer in my case.
 
1

#1stangFAN

New Member
Mar 30, 2009
106
0
0
May 31, 2009
#11
  • May 31, 2009
  • #11
TheVat said:
I have the stock 3.31's, man trans, susp and tires (17's). If I went 4.10 or 3.73, I'd assume traction from a dig would leave me spinning in first and second. You have an auto, but still if you get some wider tires, better suspension, the 4.10's would be good.
Click to expand...

well i do have some yokohama s-drive tires on, 255's in from and 285's in the back, that should be good right?
 

Five Oh Brian

Member
Jun 13, 2007
552
1
16
Pacific Northwest
May 31, 2009
#12
  • May 31, 2009
  • #12
Gas mileage doesn't change much (if at all) around town when going from 3.31's to 4.10's. This because gears are a torque multiplier, so to accelerate your car from a stop or low speeds, you'll need less throttle position to accelerate at the same rate of speed with steeper gears (such as the 4.10's). Less throttle position means less fuel consumed.

At highway speeds, you may see a very small drop in fuel economy at a steady state cruise with the steeper gears as you are turning a few hundred more rpm's. However, the OP says he doesn't drive on the highway much, so steeper gears would be ideal.

Me? I have 4.10's in my supercharged '07 GT and love them (had 4.30's in my 03 Mach 1). FRPP's and no whining at all.
 
1

#1stangFAN

New Member
Mar 30, 2009
106
0
0
May 31, 2009
#13
  • May 31, 2009
  • #13
Five Oh Brian said:
Gas mileage doesn't change much (if at all) around town when going from 3.31's to 4.10's. This because gears are a torque multiplier, so to accelerate your car from a stop or low speeds, you'll need less throttle position to accelerate at the same rate of speed with steeper gears (such as the 4.10's). Less throttle position means less fuel consumed.

At highway speeds, you may see a very small drop in fuel economy at a steady state cruise with the steeper gears as you are turning a few hundred more rpm's. However, the OP says he doesn't drive on the highway much, so steeper gears would be ideal.

Me? I have 4.10's in my supercharged '07 GT and love them (had 4.30's in my 03 Mach 1). FRPP's and no whining at all.
Click to expand...

thanks, best reply so far that summed the majority of things up besides getting someone with some actual MPG numbers to post.
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
May 31, 2009
#14
  • May 31, 2009
  • #14
I went 4.10s in my auto and I've never looked back! They've been in for nearly 60K miles and I've never had an issue! I run a taller rear tire than most (29.2") others on the street. The 4.10s allow me to do that and not lose much performance. I run the OEM 235/50-18 in the winter and 26.5" MTs to and from the track and the 4.10s are still very easy to live with out on the open highway at 80 MPH If you're thinking between 3.73s and 4.10s, do the 4.10s as you may do the 3.73s then wish you went that one extra step.


Casey4s said:
I totaly agree, I think the tech that did the installs on my car has done something wrong. I need to just lose the money and go to another installer in my case.
Click to expand...
I don't think that's it. Same installer did my FRRP gear install. Perhaps there is an issue other than just the ring and pinion that is causing the whine...
 

SCJSTU

New Member
Feb 22, 2009
26
0
1
Georgia
May 31, 2009
#15
  • May 31, 2009
  • #15
gears

My 2006 GT has 4.10's and is an auto....makes the car jump.....prev owner got about 22 mpg but I get 16 mpg....I can't keep my foot out cause its so much fun.......
 

Five Oh Brian

Member
Jun 13, 2007
552
1
16
Pacific Northwest
Jun 1, 2009
#16
  • Jun 1, 2009
  • #16
#1stangFAN said:
thanks, best reply so far that summed the majority of things up besides getting someone with some actual MPG numbers to post.
Click to expand...

When my car was 100% stock, but with 4.10's, I was getting about 26-7 mpg on the highway at 60 mph on cruise control. Dropped to about 23-4 mpg at 70 mph on cruise control.

4.10's, big stall converter, custom tuning, and Vortech V2 supercharger: I get 23-4 mpg on the highway at 60 mph, and 19-20 mpg at 70 mph. The drop from pre-blower is mostly because the stall converter and those speeds keep surging a bit to induce boost from the supercharger.

Around town, I got about 15-16 mpg with the 4.10's before the blower went on, but I'm a lead foot. With the blower, I'm down to about 11-12 mpg, but I drive like John Force every chance I get!
 

darien87

Member
Jan 30, 2009
132
1
18
Bay area, California
Jun 1, 2009
#17
  • Jun 1, 2009
  • #17
I'm kinda in the same boat the OP is. I want to get new gears, (I've got the stock 3.55's), but I don't want to kill my gas mileage. I drive on the freeway every day. So I'm leaning towards the 3.73's because I think the 4.10's will be too steep.

I think it's going to be hard to find someone that can really give you an apples-to-apples comparison, because even when you just change your gears and do nothing else, the tendency is going to be to drive the car harder to feel the difference.

I recently went from the stock aribox, to a Bullitt CAI and Predator tune, and I'm trying to see if there is much of a fuel mileage difference. But I can't really, because I constantly find myself driving the car harder because the throttle response is so much better now.
 
1

#1stangFAN

New Member
Mar 30, 2009
106
0
0
Jun 1, 2009
#18
  • Jun 1, 2009
  • #18
Five Oh Brian said:
When my car was 100% stock, but with 4.10's, I was getting about 26-7 mpg on the highway at 60 mph on cruise control. Dropped to about 23-4 mpg at 70 mph on cruise control.

4.10's, big stall converter, custom tuning, and Vortech V2 supercharger: I get 23-4 mpg on the highway at 60 mph, and 19-20 mpg at 70 mph. The drop from pre-blower is mostly because the stall converter and those speeds keep surging a bit to induce boost from the supercharger.

Around town, I got about 15-16 mpg with the 4.10's before the blower went on, but I'm a lead foot. With the blower, I'm down to about 11-12 mpg, but I drive like John Force every chance I get!
Click to expand...

sweet thats pretty much what i wanted to see from the #'s comparison, but i know its off topic but can someone please tell me what a stall converter is? i know, totally noob question but i just dont get them and i didnt want to make a new thread
 

SCJSTU

New Member
Feb 22, 2009
26
0
1
Georgia
Jun 2, 2009
#19
  • Jun 2, 2009
  • #19
410

"Around town, I got about 15-16 mpg with the 4.10's before the blower went on, but I'm a lead foot. With the blower, I'm down to about 11-12 mpg, but I drive like John Force every chance I get!"


yep...me too!
 

Five Oh Brian

Member
Jun 13, 2007
552
1
16
Pacific Northwest
Jun 4, 2009
#20
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #20
#1stangFAN said:
...can someone please tell me what a stall converter is? i know, totally noob question but i just dont get them and i didnt want to make a new thread
Click to expand...

A stall converter is a torque converter with a higher rpm launch ability for an automatic transmission. Guys with manual transmissions can rev up their cars really high and drop the clutch for a super hard launch. Automatics don't have that luxury with the stock torque converter, so getting a converter that revs higher at launch is the way to go for much quicker starts.

The stock torque converter flashes to about 2300 rpm's if you mash the gas pedal. A stall converter that flashes to about 3000 to 3200 rpm's is a good street/strip upgrade, but our heavy cars really need a bit more to really launch hard. 3400 to 3600 rpm converters are really about perfect for entertaining street/strip cars, while maintaining decent fuel economy. I bought one rated for 3600 rpm's (in a stock GT). Once you start adding horsepower, though, the rpm's that it flashes it will go up. So, with just a CAI & tune, my was flashing to 3800 rpm's. Added the supercharger and it now flashes to 4800 rpm's making for a very aggressive launch (just like a guy with a manual trans revving to 4800 rpm's and dumping the clutch).

Keep in mind that if you take off with partial throttle, the car won't rev as high. The flash speeds I mentioned above are only at wide open throttle. So, the car will feel normal at light throttle, but is a beast when you mash the pedal to the floor. Wide open throttle shifts are better, too, as rpm's never fall below the flash speed (unlike a manual trans when you lift off the gas to shift and lose rpm's - and boost with a blower/turbo).

To preserve fuel economy, select a stall converter with a lock-up feature. The factory torque converter locks up in 4th and 5th gears (with an internal clutch in the converter) to get better mileage at highway speeds. Low gears don't need the lock-up as you want the converter loose to rev higher for better acceleration. Too loose all the time, though, generates heat which is harder on the trans. So, a bigger trans cooler is a great idea with bigger stall speeds.

Hope this info gets you started. Anyone with an automatic who drag races or wants a more aggressive daily driver should get an aftermarket stall converter. Mine dropped 3 tenths of a second off my 60', 330', and 1/8 mile ET's at the dragstrip and made the car so much funner to drive. Got more performance gain from the converter than the 4.10 gears (and for about the same money).
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Lost my Foxbody
  • Mhalc1
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
604
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 17, 2026
Mhalc1
M
New from North Texas
  • MFReeves
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
9
Views
489
The Welcome Wagon Sep 22, 2025
nickyb
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
8
Views
272
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 21, 2026
X-cam34
X
A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?