• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

How much HP?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DSGcoupe
  • Start date Start date May 11, 2004
D

DSGcoupe

New Member
Nov 19, 2003
6
0
0
Illinois
May 11, 2004
#1
  • May 11, 2004
  • #1
I have a friend who is looking into spending some $$$ building up his TC. He is looking into going with the ESSLINGER 3 Liter stroker, big valve head, stainless header, etc, etc, etc. and feeding it with a T-76. As far as street driving with him, it will be limited and at low boost on 93 octane. My question is, How much RWHP has someone squeezed out of a setup like this? I am meaning with race fuel, tuning and the works.

Thanks
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
May 11, 2004
#2
  • May 11, 2004
  • #2
3 ltr? hmm...are you talking about a tall deck block? i have yet to see a standard bore 2.3 block make it 3.0 safely(smartly) there is nothing street able about that setup truthfully....but in answer to your question, who can say. Similar setups with stroked tall blocks and "the works" have seen 700hp, you can make as much hp as you want, if you are willing to put the $$ into it.
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 11, 2004
#3
  • May 11, 2004
  • #3
Yup. John dell runs 735 rwhp but I stop counting at like 6k in his motor He uses a tall deck which is very hard to find from what I understand. Give your friend dell's link, its got a break down of everything dell is running and its not a stroker either.

http://hometown.aol.com/fourced/

P.s Johns car is streetable and runs low 9's also
 
J

Jayber

New Member
May 9, 2004
32
0
0
May 11, 2004
#4
  • May 11, 2004
  • #4
Is Joe Morgans ole 4 a stroker?
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 11, 2004
#5
  • May 11, 2004
  • #5
I don't think his counts its a midget motor
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
May 12, 2004
#6
  • May 12, 2004
  • #6
Jayber said:
Is Joe Morgans ole 4 a stroker?
Click to expand...

His Pinto is not, his Focus is a 2.8...esslinger block (as stated).

As stated also, you can't make a 3.0 without a tall deck block (~4500 bucks used).

Stinger
 
D

DSGcoupe

New Member
Nov 19, 2003
6
0
0
Illinois
May 12, 2004
#7
  • May 12, 2004
  • #7
I haven't had a chance to actually go out and measure the deck height on this block he brought in but he claims that it is a tall deck block.
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 12, 2004
#8
  • May 12, 2004
  • #8
John Dell found like 3-4 tall decks on Ebay for 1200 each once and bought them all. That is the cheapest I have heard one sell for. Now I don't know if its true but I heard someone say its cost a lot more on internal parts when useing a tall Deck also compared to a regular block.
 
D

DSGcoupe

New Member
Nov 19, 2003
6
0
0
Illinois
May 12, 2004
#9
  • May 12, 2004
  • #9
This is correct. Tall decks cost $$$ to build. I went out and it is a standard 2.3 block out of an SVO mustang. No problem, he could still squeeze 2.8 liters out of it. Here is another question. What is the difference between standard N/A 2.3 blocks and Turbo 2.3 blocks if any?
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
May 12, 2004
#10
  • May 12, 2004
  • #10
If it's an 87-90 n/a block then the only differences are in metallurgy, lack of an oil return...91-93 have smaller mains along with the above mentioned differences...
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 12, 2004
#11
  • May 12, 2004
  • #11
DSGcoupe said:
This is correct. Tall decks cost $$$ to build. I went out and it is a standard 2.3 block out of an SVO mustang. No problem, he could still squeeze 2.8 liters out of it. Here is another question. What is the difference between standard N/A 2.3 blocks and Turbo 2.3 blocks if any?
Click to expand...

It will still take a lot of money just to do the 2.8L stroker and probly make the car less dependable. If it was me and I know its not...but I would just use a stock 2.3T motor. We have all seen pretty good rwhp out of these motors. I've seen 12's with these motors in 3700lb cars and even faster in pintos.
 

i4power

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
1,083
0
0
Eglin AFB, Florida
May 13, 2004
#12
  • May 13, 2004
  • #12
I suppose he'd need the 2.8L displacement to spool up a T-76 turbo...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
469
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
669
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Wheels-Tires LS mii swap and rear rim size/axle questions....
  • 78mIIman
  • Feb 2, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
682
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 6, 2025
78 Mach1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?