• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

how much power out of lt over shorties

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1994Vib.RedGT
  • Start date Start date Jan 24, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

1994Vib.RedGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
585
0
16
Denver, CO
Jan 24, 2006
#1
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #1
I currently have mac shorties, but a very well respected mustang guy i know told me that he gained about 15hp from long tubes on his bolt on 5.0 as opposed to 3hp from shorties, is this common, if so im thinking about switching.
 

FlyBy763

Member
Apr 23, 2004
439
0
17
Palm Bay, FL
Jan 24, 2006
#2
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #2
Probably about right....I think the thing with long tubes over shorties is more the "area under the curve" that it gives you rather than peak power. Mine gave me about 2 tenths on an otherwise stock motor.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jan 24, 2006
#3
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #3
FlyBy763 said:
Probably about right....I think the thing with long tubes over shorties is more the "area under the curve" that it gives you rather than peak power. Mine gave me about 2 tenths on an otherwise stock motor.
Click to expand...

I agree

LT's will produce a noticable amount of low & mid range torque over shortys.

Peak hp difference won't be as great as the tq difference from my findings.

Grady
 
M

melo yelo

New Member
Jun 13, 2002
5
0
0
Fayettville, NC
Jan 24, 2006
#4
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #4
Long tubes over shorties, **** the smog nazis and tree huggers. Its all about hp and a nice broad and flat torque curve.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jan 24, 2006
#5
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #5
melo yelo said:
Long tubes over shorties, **** the smog nazis and tree huggers. Its all about hp and a nice broad and flat torque curve.
Click to expand...

Would you believe I've passed the Texas State annual emissions dyno roller thingy instection with flying colors for the past three years.

The tech even went as far as to show me my car burned cleaner than most others he had tested.

Grady
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Jan 24, 2006
#6
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #6
Ya, I believe you did pass the inspection. I asked my smog tester dude about long tubes headers and he said "As long as you have two cats in the right place and the smog pump and EGR equipment is in place and functioning I can't fail you on the visual inspection".
Joe
 
I

igotyofire

Member
Feb 26, 2004
774
1
19
Southern California
Jan 24, 2006
#7
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #7
This is from a post on corral

Before Exhaust:


After Exhaust:
 

Attachments

  • DynoRunApril.webp
    44.5 KB · Views: 132
  • DynoRun11July.webp
    46.2 KB · Views: 126

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jan 24, 2006
#8
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #8
igotyofire

Have you got any more details other than .............

before & after exhaust

Grady
 

95GTV8

New Member
Jul 25, 2005
386
3
0
Washington State
Jan 24, 2006
#9
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #9
i was wondering the same thing grady, what brand of exhaust, what's the full setup, i'm also debating LT's or Shorty's. Shortys seem more practical as they are matching with stock so i can upgrade my exhaust system more 1 peice at a time, long tubes look pretty hard to get in there, and i'd have to do all of my exhaust @ once, lt/midpipe wise. I'll be making my mind up soon!
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
Jan 24, 2006
#10
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #10
That first dyno curve looks like a failed run. The torque has a flat spot early on, and the run ended far too soon.

BTW, I would think it would be fairly impractical for someone to run a comparison dyno comparing shorties and LT given the work in installing LT headers. Unless you had the motor out and were running on an engine dyno. Maybe a before and after when installing LT, I guess. Anyway, hopefully that's what those graphs are showing. Please fill in the details on the runs, if available.
 

SWYZ721

Member
Aug 24, 2004
208
0
16
Ann Arbor, MI
Jan 24, 2006
#11
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #11
If long tubes help add torque then it only makes sense that they wouldn't make too much a difference up top as that is where the torque and horsepower curve cross.

Also does anyone have an explanation for the torque gains besides "they just do" or "it flows better"
 

91LX_5L

Founding Member
May 13, 2002
1,943
0
36
British Columbia
Jan 24, 2006
#12
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #12
ya i was thinkin the same frist run doesnt look that great, what did they add assuming longtubes and h pipe?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jan 24, 2006
#13
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #13
I don't think anything is wrong with the first pull.

To me, it looks like the tech started capturing data a bit before he had the pedal to the metal.

I've seen curves that look like that from the start of the pull on more than one occasion before.

Grady
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
Jan 24, 2006
#14
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #14
I wasn't looking at the start of the graph, but how the torque looks like a table top from 2800 to 3600.
 

jorge.pena

New Member
Jan 6, 2006
30
0
0
San Antonio,TX
Jan 24, 2006
#15
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #15
The way I understand it, headders are like anything else, it's a matter of what you are trying to do with your engine, the pipes have to match the rest of the combo. Generally speaking shorter wider pipes produce more HP, while longer narrower pipes produce more torque, so,if you're building a torque monster go with the long, if you're going for a top end screamer go with the shorts, and if you want the best of both worlds build the torquer and give it a 150 shot of go juice to help it at the top! Yeah baby!
 

fox racer

Member
Jun 22, 2004
577
0
16
Staten Island, NYC
Jan 24, 2006
#16
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #16
theres a reason all serious drag racers run LTs!
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jan 24, 2006
#17
  • Jan 24, 2006
  • #17
SWYZ721 said:
Also does anyone have an explanation for the torque gains besides "they just do" or "it flows better"
Click to expand...

The word is Scavenging.

Shortys are not long enough for the above to take place and they have no collector so to speak like LT's.

Simple and very crudely explained

With LT's, you got each tube ending in the collector. The different lengths of each pipe are fashioned in such a way that you get the benefit of this Scavenging effect. You got the different exhaust pulse waves from each cylinder ending up in the collector and this also aids in this Scavenging effect.

Put all that together (and most likely more that I don't know about here ) and the exhaust gasses literally get sucked out of the header by the other cylinder's pulses.

Extremely basic I know
but
kinda sorta how it works

Grady
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jan 25, 2006
#18
  • Jan 25, 2006
  • #18
95GTV8 said:
i was wondering the same thing grady, what brand of exhaust, what's the full setup, i'm also debating LT's or Shorty's. Shortys seem more practical as they are matching with stock so i can upgrade my exhaust system more 1 peice at a time, long tubes look pretty hard to get in there, and i'd have to do all of my exhaust @ once, lt/midpipe wise. I'll be making my mind up soon!
Click to expand...

I'll give you a little challenge here.

Compare the dyno pulls of several street combos which have impressive torque curves. We are talking about one that is broad from low rpms and holds flat to mid rpm or above.

Then look at some pulls that have torque curves that are shaped similar to the hp curve.

See what kind of headers seem to be used in each of the two groups we have talked about.

Grady
 
1

1SLO306

My 97 GTP owns you ALL!
Mar 31, 2005
904
1
17
Muhlenberg, ky
Jan 25, 2006
#19
  • Jan 25, 2006
  • #19
go with LT's. u will tell a diff. but have fun instaling them. They can be a PITA
 
I

igotyofire

Member
Feb 26, 2004
774
1
19
Southern California
Jan 25, 2006
#20
  • Jan 25, 2006
  • #20
final5-0 said:
igotyofire

Have you got any more details other than .............

before & after exhaust

Grady
Click to expand...
Corral Thread http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?p=5546281#post5546281

His user name is "Darren5.0L" on the corral forums and this is his mod list in his sig

1995 Mustang GTS
226.8 RWHP and 303.8 RWTQ NA
MAC Longtube Headers
MAC Prochamber
Ford Racing M51 Catback
ZEX WET Nitrous Kit w/Purge&Bottle Heater
March UD Pulleys
UPR Smog Delete
EGR Delete,
K+N
Cervini's Ram-Air
C&L Truflow Inlet Tube
Superchips Inc. Bluechip (it sucked, now gone.)
MSD Blaster
FRPP 9mm Wires
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Power door lock motor Question
  • NYFox
  • Mar 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
276
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 17, 2026
NYFox
N
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
119
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Yesterday at 7:02 PM
AeroCoupe
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
753
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
211
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?