• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

How to rid exhaust drone?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spoulson
  • Start date Start date Jan 4, 2010

spoulson

Member
Nov 3, 2009
76
0
7
Middletown, DE
Jan 4, 2010
#1
  • Jan 4, 2010
  • #1
I run a MAC cat-back with H, high flow cats, and shorties. I love the sound, but I hate the deafening drone, especially after a long drive. I have a toddler that loves riding in the car and I don't want to damage his hearing, too.

Can anyone tell me what they've done to cure a the drone that actually worked? I'm thinking welding in new mufflers, but can't decide if any other brand would actually solve the problem.
 

1991notchbackLX

Active Member
Dec 25, 2007
1,483
47
48
New York
Jan 4, 2010
#2
  • Jan 4, 2010
  • #2
are the mufflers dumped at the rear diff or does the car have tailpipes on it?
 

skunk21

Active Member
May 22, 2007
1,203
3
36
Taxachusetts
Jan 4, 2010
#3
  • Jan 4, 2010
  • #3
It's the byproduct of some straight through mufflers, some are worse than others and when you reach the magic rpms drone city. Magnaflows seem to have lowestest drone but I still get some, nature of the beast but not as bad has flowmasters and some of the others I have ridden in. One of ways to deal with it is to lay Dynamat or similiar product on the floors and hatch/trunk area, this really cuts down on the sound since the factory matting is pretty much useless, negatives of dynamat cost and added weight positives it works. The quiet mufflers use more chambers and packing but they are a restictive plug.
 

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Jan 4, 2010
#4
  • Jan 4, 2010
  • #4
i use magnaflows. ive had over the years; mac, flowmaster 2 and 3 chamber, flowmaster replica's, spintech, and im sure more. i use nothing except magnaflow now.

i get no drone. if its anything, its so minor i don't even acknowledge it.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jan 4, 2010
#5
  • Jan 4, 2010
  • #5
even the worst flowing mufflers(flowmaster) will only be a few hp off from the best flowing mufflers. go with whichever muffler you like the most.
 

spoulson

Member
Nov 3, 2009
76
0
7
Middletown, DE
Jan 4, 2010
#6
  • Jan 4, 2010
  • #6
It's a MAC catback with 2.5" tips, not dumps. It resonates badly at 2000 rpm, but still pretty noisy at all other rpms.

I've had Magnaflow on my last (non-Ford) car and liked the fit/finish/sound. I'll have to see about putting them in as replacements. I'm not concerned with losing a few HP in the process. My hearing is more important to me.

I've considered Dynamat/Hushmat/etc., but I really think the best bang for the buck will be in addressing the source first. That is, unless someone can convince me otherwise.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jan 4, 2010
#7
  • Jan 4, 2010
  • #7
odd, I have that same setup minus the cats and it does not drone. wish there was some advice I could give you.
 

skunk21

Active Member
May 22, 2007
1,203
3
36
Taxachusetts
Jan 4, 2010
#8
  • Jan 4, 2010
  • #8
spoulson said:
It's a MAC catback with 2.5" tips, not dumps. It resonates badly at 2000 rpm, but still pretty noisy at all other rpms.

I've had Magnaflow on my last (non-Ford) car and liked the fit/finish/sound. I'll have to see about putting them in as replacements. I'm not concerned with losing a few HP in the process. My hearing is more important to me.

I've considered Dynamat/Hushmat/etc., but I really think the best bang for the buck will be in addressing the source first. That is, unless someone can convince me otherwise.
Click to expand...


you will not loose any HP switching too magnaflows.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Jan 4, 2010
#9
  • Jan 4, 2010
  • #9
Ditch the MAC mufflers and wled in some Dyno Max Super Turbos. Those are the quietest mufflers next to stock ones.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Quiet Exhaust
  • Crigano
  • Mar 27, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 3, 2022
chrlsful
C
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
Completely eliminated exhaust drone
  • LX Dave
  • Apr 12, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
11K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2023
LX Dave
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
C
Anybody recognize this car?
  • ctandc
  • Jun 14, 2023
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
10
Views
3K
The Welcome Wagon Apr 27, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?