• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

I can't belive I am asking this but.......

  • Thread starter Thread starter Donny
  • Start date Start date Sep 9, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Sep 10, 2004
#21
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #21
HairyCanary said:
I think you guys are giving too much credit to the Fox -- .
Click to expand...

I for one, just said the fox should win....and my reply was b/c of the gears. I noticed a HUGE difference in off the line quickness when myh 3.73's went in.

I see some people saying "not a chance"...you'll get creamed,etc.. That I dont know for sure!
RC
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
52
Portland, Oregon
Sep 10, 2004
#22
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #22
94GTLaserRC said:
I for one, just said the fox should win....and my reply was b/c of the gears. I noticed a HUGE difference in off the line quickness when myh 3.73's went in.

I see some people saying "not a chance"...you'll get creamed,etc.. That I dont know for sure!
RC
Click to expand...
I realize the gears help, but in my experience a lot of what you get with gears is SOTP feel, not a huge increase in actual objective performance. I think if the SN95 had a manual tranny, he'd walk the Fox gears or not .



Dave
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Sep 10, 2004
#23
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #23
HairyCanary said:
I think if the SN95 had a manual tranny, he'd walk the Fox gears or not .

Dave
Click to expand...


Agreed...But he DOESNT!

"IF" he had NOS and a Vortech, he would win also.

The gears will get the thing moving off the line quicker for sure...Would be close...and since both are AOD(E)'s...the better driver advantage is not as important as with a stick.

Let us know what happens..
My $$ is on him by 3 tenths.

RC
 

Treview1

Member
Feb 25, 2004
46
0
7
PA
Sep 10, 2004
#24
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #24
you will probably lose, but not by all that much.

Both engines are more or less the same power wise, despite the rating differences.....my 94 GT coupe weighed exactly 100 lbs heavier than my buddies 87 GT...similar options, neither verts.....so you guys are probably close.

race and see....
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Sep 10, 2004
#25
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #25
The engines are identical,so HP is the same.Ford came up with a new method on how to measure HP in 1993,thats why the figures changed.If the vert was stock,IMO,the better driver would win.But with the few mods that he has,it will close the deal,you should lose.JMO You can send t-moss a PM,and he will write you back.150 is the going price for a lower intake.
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
52
Portland, Oregon
Sep 10, 2004
#26
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #26
It'll be interesting to see the result. I can't imagine how slow a 94/95 GT AODE must really be -- I drove a Fox GT hatch with AOD one time and it was the slowest V8 Mustang I've ever driven, hands down. Wouldn't so much as squeak the tires on launch.

Dave
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Sep 11, 2004
#27
  • Sep 11, 2004
  • #27
HairyCanary said:
It'll be interesting to see the result. I can't imagine how slow a 94/95 GT AODE must really be -- I drove a Fox GT hatch with AOD one time and it was the slowest V8 Mustang I've ever driven, hands down. Wouldn't so much as squeak the tires on launch.

Dave
Click to expand...
Thats true!! Mine wouldnt even power brake when it was stock.(It had 2.73 gears) With just the addition of a Precision Industries Torque converter,It would smoke the tires by just punching it out I got gears after,but Im sure it makes a world of difference over the stock gears.
 

Black Stampede

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,811
2
39
Grand Rapids, MI
Sep 12, 2004
#28
  • Sep 12, 2004
  • #28
Whatever you do you MUST get 4.10 gears. DO NOT waste your time with 3.73s if you have an automatic. With 4.10s your car should launch pretty darn good.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 12, 2004
#29
  • Sep 12, 2004
  • #29
Gears are more $, and if you have to choose between gears or one of my lowers first, do the gears - then the intake.
 

Donny

Something about a big schlong...I can't remember.
Founding Member
Feb 10, 2002
669
1
39
54
The PoorHouse
www.cardomain.com
Sep 13, 2004
#30
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #30
tmoss said:
Gears are more $, and if you have to choose between gears or one of my lowers first, do the gears - then the intake.
Click to expand...
Thanks,
I will keep you in mind when I am ready.

I am buying a house right now so money is tight and I am not sure if I will even have enuff for the gears!

Donny
 

Donny

Something about a big schlong...I can't remember.
Founding Member
Feb 10, 2002
669
1
39
54
The PoorHouse
www.cardomain.com
Sep 13, 2004
#31
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #31
Black Stampede said:
Whatever you do you MUST get 4.10 gears. DO NOT waste your time with 3.73s if you have an automatic. With 4.10s your car should launch pretty darn good.
Click to expand...

My car is a daily driver and I have been told the 4.10's are a little too much for the highways.

Donny
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 13, 2004
#32
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #32
3:73 is a good all-round gear.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Sep 13, 2004
#33
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #33
tmoss said:
3:73 is a good all-round gear.
Click to expand...
WERD!
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Sep 13, 2004
#34
  • Sep 13, 2004
  • #34
I had 373's and 410's.The 373's were 2 tenths faster in the 1/4 mile,but it is fun driven around with 410's,they keep you honest on the highway At 2500rpm,Im doing 72 mph,and if I keep it under 2500rpm's,I still get 21 mpg But 373's are a great gear,,,I know Im not helping
 

Black Stampede

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,811
2
39
Grand Rapids, MI
Sep 15, 2004
#35
  • Sep 15, 2004
  • #35
For an auto. there is no reason not to get 4.10s. The whole highway RPM BS is just that.....BS. 300 RPMs difference. For a stick car, yes, I would agree with 3.73s like I have in my own car, but for an auto, you need all the help you can get out of the hole.
 

tonys5.0

New Member
Sep 17, 2004
122
0
0
Jacksonville, FL
Sep 17, 2004
#36
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • #36
Or you could just lay down about $499 for a Zex dry nitrous kit which should take about 2-3hrs to install yourself. Your best advantage for gains at about 75-100 hp.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
202
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
S
Help with window and possible engine
  • StefRena22
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
925
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2025
Willybill32
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?