NiteMareGT said:
What the heck is wrong with some of you guys............you saying things like "Thats what you expect from Ford", and, "The reason is because we have a cheap v8 sports car as opposed to Vettes and Vipers" and what-not..........
Agreed 100%... the people who post that kind of crap probably couldn't afford a new V6 Mustang. They drive Dodge Caravans and they are jealous of the few people who can own any kind of fast car. They try to discount what we have earned by calling it "cheap." They try and soothe their pain at driving a Caravan by mocking what others (their superiors in life) own.
As far as Vipers and Corvettes go, believe me when I say they have quality problems of their own. The GT is a better all-around car than the Viper and isn't far behind the Corvette. Just about every Corvette I see has water collecting in the taillamp assemblies and crooked exhaust. Vipers ride like ***** and have a crummy little top that makes the Mustang covertible top look like something off a Bentley.
triblack97cobra said:
get over it.. ford mad the cars to drive not race.. i have a 97 cobra and my tranny went out at 28000 miles. when you race or just drive fast **** breaks.. get over it.. buy a tko or something like that if you want to drive hard.. so deal... ..
Actually, I think the '99-and-up GTs will endure a real beating at the drag strip. In fact, I know they will. There are two basic problems here, neither of which you really mention: transmissions that were improperly serviced or assembled, and people who haven't learned to drive a standard.
My honest opinion: it's revealing that I don't have these problems, despite the fact that my '01 GT is the first stickshift I have driven regularly, and despite the fact that I flogged it mercilessly at the track.
What makes me special? I didn't ***** with the damn thing. I didn't change its fluid, change its shifter, change the rear-end gears, etc. I just left it the hell alone, and have had zero problems. Could this be a coincidence? Or is it possible that what we are seeing here is at least partially the result of improperly installed or designed modifications? Believe me, that is what Ford will say to many of you, and I'm inclined to agree until proven otherwise.
It's amazing how easily people get away with making stereotypical statements like "the Mustang is cheap" or "the Mustang is only good to modify." Have the people who make these statements ever really driven a stock Mustang for a prolonged period of time? It's amazing how refined the newer ones actually are... mine is the quietest, smoothest-riding car I've ever owned, and I have owned multiple Buicks, an Oldsmobile, and a Nova. These were cushy cars, but the new Mustang beats them overall in NVH. It's also better-assembled, and I personally think the stock 3650 shifts like butter. As far as speed goes, I think you all know that I ran 13s in my stock GT, and there are plenty of people with long mod lists who aren't doing that. Blame it on the rain?
And I already described in detail why the T3650 and 3.27s make up the ideal drivetrain for the Mustang (see the other 3650-related thread). I did more than write about this, I made it happen at the track. So get out your flamethrowers, but I am not ready to conclusively blame Ford for anything mentioned on this thread.