• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

I think a gear change is needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mstng93SSP
  • Start date Start date Apr 27, 2021

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
Apr 27, 2021
#1
  • Apr 27, 2021
  • #1
My 93 coupe has 3:73's in it. and an AOD with a 2500 converter and silver fox valve body. Now that I have installed the On3 Turbo I feel like the 3:73's are too much. The car just gets up into the power band too fast and I am always having to get off it. I know my right foot has a lot to do with it but I feel like 3:27's might be better. Opinions?
 

CtCarl

Active Member
Apr 27, 2002
72
18
28
Southern Connecticut
Apr 27, 2021
#2
  • Apr 27, 2021
  • #2
I love the 3.73s in my '87, but I've got a World Class T-5 Z with the taller 2.95 first gear. A buddy of mine who bought his notchback in '87 had 3.27s with his AOL from the factory.

Personally, I always thought 3.55 was a good compromise for the AOD. But it's hardly worth switching out 3.73 for 3.55.
 

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
Apr 27, 2021
#3
  • Apr 27, 2021
  • #3
I love 3:73's too, but they are not ideal with the turbo.
 
S

slow84lx

clean it good before insertion
Jul 3, 2005
372
180
63
Dallas, TX
Apr 27, 2021
#4
  • Apr 27, 2021
  • #4
I think that you are experiencing what many do after putting on a turbo. There is a need to get the gearing more suited to the new power curve. It's common to revert back to original equipment comparable ratio's with 3.27's being one of the more popular. Your car with the new power curve will likely respond well.

...but, this summary isn't from personal experience, I've never owned any car with a turbo, although, I've followed along on the forums thru a lot of conversions and gear discussions. I think that you are on the right track.
 
Reactions: Mstng93SSP

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Apr 27, 2021
#5
  • Apr 27, 2021
  • #5
I have 3.73’s...and a pretty wild power band that comes on late compared to yours...The thing to consider isn’t how quickly it goes through the 1,2,3....it’s what happens when it goes into OD, and you lock up the converter.
if the interstate and the speed/rpm it cruises at are even remotely a consideration, you need to see where it is at 70 mph locked up...for me that’s about 2200 rpm...if you put a 3.27 in the rear, the rpm on the highway will be so low that the engine may be too lazy to get decent gas mileage. But that’s all relative I guess..especially if you don’t care about the cruise.
 
Reactions: Mstng93SSP

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,931
224
Massachusetts
Apr 28, 2021
#6
  • Apr 28, 2021
  • #6
I've always had the notion that as your power levels go up, your gear ratio needs to go down the other direction towards lower numerical gears to keep the engine in the powerband more. Of course, what gear to go with depends on many other factors.

But the whole "don't fear the gear" movement seemed to be during a time when bolt-ons were the most common mod and a pair of decent heads was not as common as it is today along with plentiful turbos for everyone. We almost needs to rethink that.

In your shoes, i would definitely be considering 3.27's, 3.31's or even 3.55's although i don't think the jump from 3.73 to 3.55 is worth it.
 
Reactions: General karthief

Ryuk

I love your drawers
5 Year Member
Apr 22, 2017
1,683
1,605
133
Apr 28, 2021
#7
  • Apr 28, 2021
  • #7
Mustang5L5 said:
I've always had the notion that as your power levels go up, your gear ratio needs to go down the other direction towards lower numerical gears to keep the engine in the powerband more. Of course, what gear to go with depends on many other factors.

But the whole "don't fear the gear" movement seemed to be during a time when bolt-ons were the most common mod and a pair of decent heads was not as common as it is today along with plentiful turbos for everyone. We almost needs to rethink that.

In your shoes, i would definitely be considering 3.27's, 3.31's or even 3.55's although i don't think the jump from 3.73 to 3.55 is worth it.
Click to expand...
I like the inverse of this logic. My car has 2.73's, therefore I need more power.
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Apr 28, 2021
#8
  • Apr 28, 2021
  • #8
I went from a 373 to a 308 gear when I had the blower setup on the car... it was violent with the 373 gears the 308 calmed the car down quite a bit
 

Hoytster

I don't dare do that to my Knob
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 30, 2002
1,069
700
164
Cornwall, PA
Apr 28, 2021
#9
  • Apr 28, 2021
  • #9
Pretty typical from my experience, most people switch back to a lower gear ratio when going turbo. Are you blowing the tires off in the lower gears (1,2,3?). Lowering the gear ratio will help with that as well as put more load on the engine in the lower gears, which helps with spooling and power delivery on a turbo car. It's a balancing act though, you don't want so low a gear it takes forever to get into the boost. 3.27's would be a good start imo.
 
Reactions: bwest

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
Apr 28, 2021
#10
  • Apr 28, 2021
  • #10
Yeah, that is one of the issues I have. If I get on it the tires just light up and I can get sideways way too easily. I have 275/35/17 BF Goodrich tires so they should grab but nope.
 
Reactions: Hoytster and Potomus Pete

deathb4dismount

Crap, didn’t realize my crotch was in that picture
15 Year Member
Oct 6, 2011
1,031
502
164
THE BUCKET
Apr 28, 2021
#11
  • Apr 28, 2021
  • #11
Mstng93SSP said:
Yeah, that is one of the issues I have. If I get on it the tires just light up and I can get sideways way too easily. I have 275/35/17 BF Goodrich tires so they should grab but nope.
Click to expand...

Sport Comp 2s?
 

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
Apr 28, 2021
#12
  • Apr 28, 2021
  • #12
Yes
 

deathb4dismount

Crap, didn’t realize my crotch was in that picture
15 Year Member
Oct 6, 2011
1,031
502
164
THE BUCKET
Apr 29, 2021
#13
  • Apr 29, 2021
  • #13
Mstng93SSP said:
Yes
Click to expand...

Not that it will make a difference in your gear choice, but IMO those tires leave something to be desired. When new they were pretty good, but after few seasons, meh. Mine still have about 70% tread left, and I can get loose on 2-3 shift with a mild h/c/i car. Those tires arent grabbing anything.
 
M

Monkeybutt2000

Mustang Master
Aug 11, 2019
1,387
849
133
Lafayette,IN
Apr 29, 2021
#14
  • Apr 29, 2021
  • #14
You're gonna need a drag radial, the ET street ss have worked well for me.
 

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
May 19, 2021
#15
  • May 19, 2021
  • #15
Spent my day doing this. What fun!



I picked up an 8.8 from a friend. It has 3:08 gears. He also gave me a set of 3:27s. I installed the 8.8 in the car with the 3:08 gears to give it a try. So far I kinda like it. Cruises smooth and I can roll into boost without the back end skating all over the place.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
May 19, 2021
#16
  • May 19, 2021
  • #16
While I understand the justification for the gear change, going from a 3.73 to a 3.08 just cost you the race. What would be the point of upping the power only to throw away the acceleration because traction is the issue? Dumping the gear isn’t the fix, putting a tire on it that hooks is.

The only time a gear change is mandated would be when target RPM is out of the range you‘re trying to be in ( i.e. cruising RPM in high gear/ engine RPM at trap speed). Now that you’ve dropped that gear so far, I think you’ll absolutely hate it when you put a drag radial on it again. Granted, a 3.08 will calm it down dramatically, but calm and slow now go hand in hand.

Im changing the gear in my car from a 3.73 down to a 3.31 only because i’m swapping a transmission. The 2.48 first gear in my current auto, ( 4l80) will go up to 3.78.
 

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
May 19, 2021
#17
  • May 19, 2021
  • #17
There is no trap speed on this here little "rock" where I live. We have not had a track here in the last 20 years. And to find a track would require a boat and a hefty shipping charge. 3:08 were already installed so that's what I went with for now. I can always gear up...but not 3:73's.
 
Reactions: Hoytster and General karthief
M

Monkeybutt2000

Mustang Master
Aug 11, 2019
1,387
849
133
Lafayette,IN
May 19, 2021
#18
  • May 19, 2021
  • #18
If I were a betting man I would bank on the 3.27s. Once I get my car back together,gonna decide on a gear swap or no. With the TKO and it's gear ratios,the 3.73s weren't that bad. However,I've been told the lower gear numbers will allow the turbo to build boost more efficiently. We'll see.
 

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
May 19, 2021
#19
  • May 19, 2021
  • #19
I just felt with the 3:73's it was like an on/off switch. When it hit boost it would hit hard. So far I like the 3:08's as it seems to get into boost in a slightly less aggressive manner. If it gets boring my engine is built for boost so I can always turn up the fun knob...
 
Reactions: Hoytster, a91what, Monkeybutt2000 and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
new :poo: box, may need to hit you guys up for 79-82 info when i fix thIs turd.
  • rednotch
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
Noobz347
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
540
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
Progress Thread 93 LX father son project
  • ZAM93LX
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 3, 2025
Scrapla347
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
192
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?