• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

I think Im gonna cry...

  • Thread starter Thread starter 93ConvertibleLX
  • Start date Start date Jan 19, 2004

93ConvertibleLX

New Member
Feb 9, 2003
101
0
0
Mittengan
Jan 19, 2004
#1
  • Jan 19, 2004
  • #1
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2454664957&category=6236

What sick twisted individual would do this??
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Jan 19, 2004
#2
  • Jan 19, 2004
  • #2
well it doesnt look that bad, i could fix it in 30 mins with some stock replacment parts! I guess having a cowl that large is nice, you can work on your motor and never open the hood!
 
1

140cilx

Founding Member
Sep 7, 2001
2,385
0
0
GA
Jan 19, 2004
#3
  • Jan 19, 2004
  • #3
!!!!!!!!!!!!!and look at the # of bid's he's getting!
 

StangGrrLy

Miss StangNet 2003
Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
1,330
0
0
Regina, Saskachewan
Jan 19, 2004
#4
  • Jan 19, 2004
  • #4
Someone is going to car H-E-double hockey sticks for that one....
 

misslightning

Does this truck make my butt look big?
Feb 20, 2003
0
0
0
Luray VA
Jan 19, 2004
#5
  • Jan 19, 2004
  • #5
what a dumba$$
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
Jan 19, 2004
#6
  • Jan 19, 2004
  • #6
93ConvertibleLX said:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2454664957&category=6236

What sick twisted individual would do this??
Click to expand...

Is this really a SVO car?

I really don't mind the BBC part, but to butcher a SVO when there are tons of GTs and LXs out there is plan stupid
 

93ConvertibleLX

New Member
Feb 9, 2003
101
0
0
Mittengan
Jan 19, 2004
#7
  • Jan 19, 2004
  • #7
Pro-Hawk said:
Is this really a SVO car?

I really don't mind the BBC part, but to butcher a SVO when there are tons of GTs and LXs out there is plan stupid
Click to expand...

My understanding is that he hacked this SVO because of the stock performance suspension and 4-wheel disc brakes...but then he put in a 9" rear and new axles...so did this guy chop up an origianl svo simply for the yellow koni's???

He took the original car, and put a new front clip on (nose and hood), and rear valance to make it the 87 up body style, then added the gt ground effects.He could have bought an 87 gt shell or a 4 banger and added the ground effects. There are so many other options!! Instead he said "Why not go find a limited production car and hack it all to hell?". Some people just dont understand........
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
Jan 19, 2004
#8
  • Jan 19, 2004
  • #8
93ConvertibleLX said:
My understanding is that he hacked this SVO because of the stock performance suspension and 4-wheel disc brakes...but then he put in a 9" rear and new axles...so did this guy chop up an origianl svo simply for the yellow koni's???

He took the original car, and put a new front clip on (nose and hood), and rear valance to make it the 87 up body style, then added the gt ground effects.He could have bought an 87 gt shell or a 4 banger and added the ground effects. There are so many other options!! Instead he said "Why not go find a limited production car and hack it all to hell?". Some people just dont understand........
Click to expand...

Thats what I'm saying, hell you can find GTs a dime a dozen now days.This guy should stop watching to much T.V, if all your doing is completely changing everything on the car to look like a later model "Fox" than you wasted time and money in my book. (Not to mention destroyed a classic car ).
 

Anlushac11

Founding Member
Feb 17, 2001
2,270
0
0
Indianapolis, Indiana
Jan 20, 2004
#9
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #9
This is the kind of genetic inbred Chevy owning driver that would buy a SVO and hack it up just to piss off a Mustang owner. Maybe we should go hack up a Yenko Camaro or a COPO Camaro?
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Jan 20, 2004
#10
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #10
IT WAS AN SVO!? awe poopy! i missed that one, it being a "svo" originally...im apauled! ignorace sometimes destroyes the good that is in this world...
 
T

toadstang

New Member
Nov 16, 2003
79
0
0
Newport News, VA
Jan 20, 2004
#11
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #11
Words cannot describe the sorrow I felt after clicking that link...the tears fell from my eyes and the screams rang like thunder... The next Chevy owner I see...is getting shot. Ruining a 19 yr. old's dream. YOU GOIN DOWN. CHEVY
 
E

ExplodingTurtle

New Member
Dec 2, 2003
39
0
0
Um... my computer, duh.
Jan 20, 2004
#12
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #12
toadstang said:
Words cannot describe the sorrow I felt after clicking that link...the tears fell from my eyes and the screams rang like thunder... The next Chevy owner I see...is getting shot. Ruining a 19 yr. old's dream. YOU GOIN DOWN. CHEVY
Click to expand...


(I *heart* your signature, Toadstang. )
 

rgosulliv

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2001
430
0
0
Lawrenceville NJ
Jan 20, 2004
#13
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #13
VIN: 1FABP28T9EF102969
Year/Make/Model: 1984 FORD MUSTANG SVO
Body Style: Runabout 3 DR
Engine Type: 2.3L L4 TURBO/IC EFI
Manufactured In: UNITED STATES
Search Results: 2 records found in our database
 

351wcoupe

New Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,811
0
0
Manhattan, Kansas
Jan 20, 2004
#14
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #14
I refuse to give any details at this time........EVERYBODY Hear me when I say this.....There is a 1969 something coming out of my garage and its not a V8(anymore) and its not Ford powered...(originally) But it sure will piss off every Die hard chevy owner not to mention outrun most of them.
 

TheFixxxer

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2002
155
0
0
Delta, Co
Jan 21, 2004
#15
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #15
[point out blatantly obvious]A 1969 Camaro with a 2.3T?[/point out blatantly obvious]
 

93ConvertibleLX

New Member
Feb 9, 2003
101
0
0
Mittengan
Jan 22, 2004
#16
  • Jan 22, 2004
  • #16
TheFixxxer said:
[point out blatantly obvious]A 1969 Camaro with a 2.3T?[/point out blatantly obvious]
Click to expand...
LMAO, I was thinking the EXACT smae thing when I read his post
 

TheFixxxer

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2002
155
0
0
Delta, Co
Jan 23, 2004
#17
  • Jan 23, 2004
  • #17
I am pretty sure that is what it is. I mean it didn't take but a fraction of a second to figure that one out.
 

SVO1

Lord of The somethin' somethin' somethin', hell, I
Oct 25, 1999
4,592
1
0
Lord of uh, hmm what was it again?
Jan 23, 2004
#18
  • Jan 23, 2004
  • #18
That is a sad sad mess of crap.

351- If you area is like ours, The former 5.0 ford 71 Camaro Was a smash hit around here.
So Much so my friend smashed it into a pole goofing around
But it really did piss a heck of a lot of people off around here!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Lost a finger so I bought a Mustang
  • Nine Finger Wrenching
  • Nov 24, 2023
  • The Welcome Wagon
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
4K
The Welcome Wagon May 13, 2024
General karthief
Foxtoberfest 2022
  • FastDriver
  • Sep 6, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2022
Ford Moore
F
Build Thread 1978 Fairmont. I bet somebody back home’s thinkin’…I wonder why he don’t write..?
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Aug 27, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 137 138 139
Replies
3K
Views
383K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 7, 2025
Rdub6
99 Mustang GT High Rev On Cold Start
  • OneSick99GT
  • Nov 20, 2018
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
10K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 29, 2018
OneSick99GT
T
Fox No Boost And Stumped
  • TWEECD
  • Aug 12, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
63
Views
13K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2017
TWEECD
T
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?