• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

i wanna lose some weight!

  • Thread starter Thread starter DerekStangGT
  • Start date Start date Jun 20, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
W

white96blown2v

New Member
Jun 16, 2005
58
0
0
detriot,MI
Jun 20, 2005
#21
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #21
stangman said:
no way is it as strong as the stocker. waaaay too much mass difference in the two to be the same strength. although the tubular one is very strong.


Click to expand...

actually this is not correct, don't get angry ,the factory unit is made to absorb an impact . its design is structured for a frontal crash , tubular metals are much stronger but don't have the give of flat or boxed metal. Think of it this way if factory steel was better or stronger John Force would be still be using it. And stock cars would be stock as well.
 
C

cronin49

Banned
Aug 12, 2003
432
1
16
SC
Jun 20, 2005
#22
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #22
DerekStangGT said:
whats the best weight reduction techniques? i need to keep my backseats b/c i have amps mounted on them and i need my a/c. other than that, what can i do?
Click to expand...


Stop eating at Burger King, MoFo.
 
D

DerekStangGT

My package is in the mail!
Feb 18, 2003
1,068
0
36
Jun 20, 2005
#23
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #23
cronin49 said:
Stop eating at Burger King, MoFo.
Click to expand...
i dont like burger king anyway. that king mascot freaks me out
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Jun 20, 2005
#24
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #24
white96blown2v said:
actually this is not correct, don't get angry ,the factory unit is made to absorb an impact . its design is structured for a frontal crash , tubular metals are much stronger but don't have the give of flat or boxed metal. Think of it this way if factory steel was better or stronger John Force would be still be using it. And stock cars would be stock as well.
Click to expand...




ok let me rephrase. the tubular piece is definately stronger pound for pound. but the stock piece is going to hold up better in a crash, just like you explained. which was the point i was trying to get across, i just worded it wrong
 

97v6Silver

it came to $4.56 and i got $0.44 change from a 5,
Apr 22, 2003
843
0
0
VA Beach
Jun 20, 2005
#25
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #25
stangman said:
ok let me rephrase. the tubular piece is definately stronger pound for pound. but the stock piece is going to hold up better in a crash, just like you explained. which was the point i was trying to get across, i just worded it wrong
Click to expand...

your member is sexy... k member that is
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Jun 20, 2005
#26
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #26
97v6Silver said:
your member is sexy... k member that is
Click to expand...



dang skippy my member is sexy
 

wesl56

New Member
Dec 26, 2003
83
1
0
Tallahassee, FL
Jun 20, 2005
#27
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #27
tubular is stronger... thats why tubular A arms and tubular chassies dont flex and stuff... and actually if you wreck, the body is going to bend before the k member does so i wouldnt really be worried about it

and how does a coilover kit save weight? if it does it cant be that much, but still coilovers are a good idea even if not for weight, and you're gonna need them with a tubular k member
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jun 21, 2005
#28
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #28
It saves weight becase the stock A arms are HUGE. You can even see how big they are in that pic in pg 1. They are kidof in the back ground. Like said, all of that should get a good 60LBS or 4 "stones" off of the front of your car....nothing worse than carrying around 4 extra stones under your hood LOL.
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Jun 21, 2005
#29
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #29
ive taken about 90 lbs off the gt so far, and i can feel a difference. its not huge, but the car does definatly feel more peppy. it can mostly be felt once the car is moving, it seems to excelerate faster.

im hoping to lose about another 90 pounds with some mods im planning for next year.
 

wesl56

New Member
Dec 26, 2003
83
1
0
Tallahassee, FL
Jun 21, 2005
#30
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #30
hotmustang331 said:
It saves weight becase the stock A arms are HUGE. You can even see how big they are in that pic in pg 1. They are kidof in the back ground. Like said, all of that should get a good 60LBS or 4 "stones" off of the front of your car....nothing worse than carrying around 4 extra stones under your hood LOL.
Click to expand...

well thats weight from the A arms, not coilovers.... but i guess thats what you mean, or whoever said that meant heh
 

300bhp/ton

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
530
0
0
England
Jun 21, 2005
#31
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #31
DerekStangGT said:
15 stone? im thinkin ~200lbs
Click to expand...
Stones pounds and ounces.

14lb to the stone so 15 stone = 210lb
 
D

DerekStangGT

My package is in the mail!
Feb 18, 2003
1,068
0
36
Jun 21, 2005
#32
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #32
ADRENLN said:
ive taken about 90 lbs off the gt so far, and i can feel a difference. its not huge, but the car does definatly feel more peppy. it can mostly be felt once the car is moving, it seems to excelerate faster.

im hoping to lose about another 90 pounds with some mods im planning for next year.
Click to expand...
what did you do to lose 90 lbs?
 

Avenger

New Member
Feb 19, 2002
1,030
0
0
QC
Jun 21, 2005
#33
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #33
I personally removed the A/C (wasn't working anyway) and the swaybar, gutted the trunk, removed the backseat / passenger seat and replaced the driver's seat by a manual seat. Went from 13.97@101.9 to 13.86@102.8. Later that day, I went 13.88@91 lifting 150' before the line to avoid breaking out. Bet I could've run 13.7X... You CAN tell the difference when driving on the street !!

If you can't notice the difference a passenger makes, you need your SOTP recalibrated
 

Canuck Stang

Founding Member
Apr 8, 2002
62
0
0
Aug 14, 2005
#34
  • Aug 14, 2005
  • #34
DerekStangGT said:
actually, the general rule of thumb is ~10rwhp=.01 in the 1/4 and every 100 lbs lost=.01 in the 1/4. i would love to be able to shave 100lbs off the stang, but that won't happen w/o major work. what i was just looking for were little things i could do to make the GT feel a little peppier.
Click to expand...

I sure hope you meant TENTHS of a second.... and not hundredths...

Unless you think adding 500HP to your car would only shave off half a second.
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Aug 14, 2005
#35
  • Aug 14, 2005
  • #35
You need to create proper weight balance first, expensive but effective - Tubular K-member, coil-over, and A arms. IRS. (you'll be adding weight with the IRS yeah)

If you haven't taken out your stock cd deck then do so, also one of the stock amps is underneith. There's also a metal plate under the steering wheel shaft that weighs a pound or so that can be removed. Removing the power seat motor is worth around 15lbs.
 

V_Eight

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
617
1
0
ATL
Aug 14, 2005
#36
  • Aug 14, 2005
  • #36
Spare tire is easy and heavy. Pass. and rear seat pop out easily.
 

Cobra4Me

New Member
Dec 26, 2003
6
0
0
San Diego, CA.
Aug 14, 2005
#37
  • Aug 14, 2005
  • #37
here's a quick way to loose 1400 lbs. ! :

Before:


After:

 

stangliter04

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
185
0
0
Port St John, Florida
Aug 14, 2005
#38
  • Aug 14, 2005
  • #38
97v6Silver said:
you could just beilt a lightweight car out of tubular aluminum and drop a stang motor in it and put a few stang emblems on it
Click to expand...
hell yeah!!!!!!!!
 

Ghostface

Member
Jan 11, 2004
226
0
17
Aug 14, 2005
#39
  • Aug 14, 2005
  • #39
Weight reduction is not really about what your removing but rather what your taking in. Think about that for a second.
 

slo65

New Member
May 26, 2003
448
0
0
Southern California
Aug 14, 2005
#40
  • Aug 14, 2005
  • #40
300bhp/ton said:
-Remove all carpets and soundedening from the inside including the roof, and in the boot and under the bonnet.
Click to expand...


 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
2004 Mustang GT – Fuel Pump Not Priming
  • Fayio
  • Apr 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
308
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 27, 2026
n0v8or
N
P
Progress Thread Weight loss 90s coupe . -500lbs
  • ponixpress
  • Mar 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 13, 2025
ponixpress
P
T
Service Fluid Recommendations for 2015 Paxton Supercharged GT
  • ThotTrap
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
137
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Aug 25, 2025
ThotTrap
T
T
Losing Refrigerant rapidly on my 98 Mustang GT
  • TekoSn95
  • Jun 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
383
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 17, 2025
TekoSn95
T
W
a/c compressors i d
  • waxman
  • Jan 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
195
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?