• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

I'm not convinced the fox swap is a good idea....PART 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter My95.0L
  • Start date Start date Apr 19, 2005

My95.0L

Founding Member
Oct 16, 2000
135
0
0
Ponchatoula, LA
Apr 19, 2005
#1
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #1
After banging my head against the wall trying to figure out why I went slower after the swap, last night I was looking at my accufab (off the car now that I swapped back to the SN95 t-body). It looked a little smaller than my BBK 70mm, not by much but I did notice it (or maybe too many miller lights). My first BBK broke the throttle blade shaft so I took the butterfly out and compared it to the accufab. Well, it didn't fit. I opened the accufab to wot, & tried to slide the BBK butterfly in over top. It was too wide by a cu*t hair. I bought the accufab off ebay & was advertised as a 70 mm, but there is no part # on the accufab to verify this. I'm thinking it may be a 65mm. This would explain the better response down low & then the drop off up top (where I went 2 tenths & 2 mph slower). Is there a way to check the accufab?


Here's the original post, so yall chime in & tell me what yall think:
Last night (March 23, 2005) was my second time at the track since the swap. Ran almost identical to my passes in Feb. Combined 6 passes I averaged a 13.1 @ 104.4 mph. Best run was 13.06 @ 104.7 mph w/ a 1.70 60' (my best 60' ever). Launches ranged from 3K-3900 rpm. That's 2 tenths & 2 mph slower than before the swap. My 60' were the best I've ever run, but the car is slower after the 330' mark. Weather conditions were actually better last night than when I went in Feb. temp was 59* last night w/ 77% humidity, whereas in Feb. the temp was 64* w/ 80% humidity.

Before the swap my last trip to the track was April 1, 2004. Conditions that night were 57* w/ 78% humidity & I ran a 12.89 @ 106.49 mph (1.75 60') and 3 more 12.9X passes @ 106.XX mph. Launches were at 3,000 rpm.
 

krahkin

Member
May 7, 2004
183
0
16
Acworth GA
Apr 19, 2005
#2
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #2
Inside-hole micrometers can tell you the bore size within .0001".
 

My95.0L

Founding Member
Oct 16, 2000
135
0
0
Ponchatoula, LA
Apr 19, 2005
#3
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #3
krahkin said:
Inside-hole micrometers can tell you the bore size within .0001".
Click to expand...


I may go to a part store & get them to check it for me.
 

krahkin

Member
May 7, 2004
183
0
16
Acworth GA
Apr 19, 2005
#4
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #4
If you dont have access to one, use a set of calipers to measure it.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Apr 19, 2005
#5
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #5
Measure the inches with a ruler, then use this link to convert the inches to MM to find out wtf you have http://education.yahoo.com/reference/weights_and_measures/index?p=length

On my 302 I went from a 65mm to a 75mm and didn't lose throttle response.
 

My95.0L

Founding Member
Oct 16, 2000
135
0
0
Ponchatoula, LA
Apr 19, 2005
#6
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #6
I'll check it. Thanks for the link.
 

Stangfreak95

add a 4
Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
3,571
0
0
In your sister. If none, your mom
Apr 19, 2005
#7
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #7
Yeah just check it yourself with a ruler. You cant go wrong. You will see a difference with your eyes between 65mm and 70mm, thats for sure.

Speaking of the tb conversion...My conversion went great. Swapped cruise cable also with no problems and everything works perfectly. Since it's been so long since I drove the stang, it totally feels like a different car to me. Although I dont have the same tires (dr's) as last year, I cant really feel the low end torque cause the car keeps breaking loose everytime I floor it in 1st or 2nd and depends on 3rd. It definately pulls way harder on top end. I'd be surprised if I lost any power through this. Sure doesnt feel like it. I went from a BBK 70mm to a Holley 75mm. I also match-ported the opening of my Performer to 75mm instead of 70mm and also have a true CAI inside the fender. I'm hitting the dyno in 2 weeks. We'll see what kind of #'s I'm pulling...
 

My95.0L

Founding Member
Oct 16, 2000
135
0
0
Ponchatoula, LA
Apr 19, 2005
#8
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #8
It was too many miller lite's
Measured it & it's a 70mm. I was really hoping this was the answer. :damnit:
Oh well. Back to square 1.
 

jruppert

Founding Member
Oct 20, 2001
294
1
19
Michigan
Apr 19, 2005
#9
  • Apr 19, 2005
  • #9
that is strange.. i ordered an 80mm accufab and is suppose to be 90 at the front opening. well today i measured the front and i got 4 inches and according to this conversion it says 101mm. i didnt measure the rear only because i merely taking a picture of the throttle and wanted to show measurement in the pic
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Aod to t5 swap will it live?
  • 87slow.0
  • Nov 5, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
501
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 5, 2024
87slow.0
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Progress Thread H/C Swap Problems/Ideas
  • sav22rem22
  • Mar 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 10, 2024
AeroCoupe
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?