• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Injector size for a 351? Guys with 351's get in here....

  • Thread starter Thread starter nmcgrawj
  • Start date Start date Aug 14, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Aug 14, 2004
#1
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #1
Whats up guys? Im building a 351 with tfs twisted wedge heads with a stage 1 port job, compcams 35-518-8 cam(similar to tfs stage 2) or maybe a custom cam, tfs 351 intake, long tubes, 5-speed, daily driver, etc.....

What size injectors should i run? Im thinking 30lb but some people tell me 36 and others say 24.

Which do you think?
 

AznStanger3v

Active Member
Aug 11, 2003
2,026
0
47
Northern VA
Aug 14, 2004
#2
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #2
i think you should swing well with 24s and up the fuel pressure a bit. or go with 30s and play with the fuel pressure as well. 36s and up are kinda the forced induction territory
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Aug 14, 2004
#3
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #3
Thats what i was thinking.....30s seem to be good. I dont wanna come close to being lean with the 24's
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 14, 2004
#4
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #4
Just like I said on corral, 30's at least and 42's if your planning on getting a bit more wild. I run 30's on my n/a 302.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Aug 14, 2004
#5
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #5
haha thanks man. Like i said over there, it wont be wild for another couple years. This will not be supercharged or used with nitrous, just all motor.
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Aug 14, 2004
#6
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #6
All motor, 30's should take you to around 450 bhp. Could go a little higher if you want to cut the safety margin down.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Aug 14, 2004
#7
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #7
So thats about 382 rwhp right? If i did go with 36s, would it run terribly rich?

Would the 30s be easier to tune since it will be in the middle of its power band?

THANKS SO FAR!
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 14, 2004
#8
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #8
When I said 'wild' I meant like a properly designed custom cam(possibly a solid cam), spinning it high, high flowing intake. I think 30's are fine for what you have, but IMO, their close to borderline. Who did the 'stage 1' port work and what do they flow?
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Aug 14, 2004
#9
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #9
nmcgrawj said:
So thats about 382 rwhp right? If i did go with 36s, would it run terribly rich?

Would the 30s be easier to tune since it will be in the middle of its power band?

THANKS SO FAR!
Click to expand...
Unless you go with far bigger injectors, it's not going to make you run any richer. As long as the EEC has been told what you're doing, it can deal just fine with larger injectors. I don't think it would be any easier to tune either way, as long as the injector is big enough go with it.

Dave
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Aug 14, 2004
#10
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #10
HairyCanary said:
Unless you go with far bigger injectors, it's not going to make you run any richer. As long as the EEC has been told what you're doing, it can deal just fine with larger injectors. I don't think it would be any easier to tune either way, as long as the injector is big enough go with it.

Dave
Click to expand...
I'd go with a minimum of 36. 382 RWHP is going to come very easy for a 351, and the 30's will be maxed. You could use any stock type high impedance injector and not run terribly rich; that includes 42's.

Joe
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Aug 14, 2004
#11
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #11
Joes95GT said:
I'd go with a minimum of 36. 382 RWHP is going to come very easy for a 351, and the 30's will be maxed. You could use any stock type high impedance injector and not run terribly rich; that includes 42's.

Joe
Click to expand...


You think a stock shortblock 351 with tfs twisted wedge heads ported by Fox Lake- stage 1(pretty sure thats the name) , most likely a custom cam if not TFS stage 2, tfs 351 intake and the other parts to go along with it will get 382rwhp? I wasn't expecting that much but hey i will take it.

I dont have the flow numbers of the port work, i bought the heads used.

Thanks for all the help so far guys...
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 14, 2004
#12
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #12
With a good streetable custom cam, thats easily 400+rwhp. Unless you have some weak blower compression? I'd use that tfs r 351 intake or a victor 5.8. If you dont have the injctors yet, I think im gonna have to recommend 42's. I cant believe people would recommend a 24lb injector for that combo!
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Aug 14, 2004
#13
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #13
Grn92LX said:
With a good streetable custom cam, thats easily 400+rwhp. Unless you have some weak blower compression? I'd use that tfs r 351 intake or a victor 5.8. If you dont have the injctors yet, I think im gonna have to recommend 42's. I cant believe people would recommend a 24lb injector for that combo!
Click to expand...
Yup.

nmc - Go with 42's. I thought you were using the stock camshaft, hence the recommendation for 36's.

Joe
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Aug 16, 2004
#14
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #14
WHOA, i havent seen anyone of the 351's (non stroked) run 42's, but i haven't seen that many. That seems like a whole lot of fuel. I thought this combo would be tough but you guys make it sound like a beast. I still cant see getting that much power out of the parts.

The most popular i have seen with 351 combos are 30 and 36's. Feel free to shed some light on my ignorance.

Thanks

EDIT: What is blower compression? (When no blower is being used?)
 

Jo_885o

New Member
Jul 17, 2003
422
0
0
Clint. Twp, Michigan
Aug 16, 2004
#15
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #15
Nate u already got the heads? U did'nt tell me that.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Aug 16, 2004
#16
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #16
ummmm oh yea.......Joe i got some heads. LOL

SHHHHHHHHH!!!! No one else knows in our area.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Aug 16, 2004
#17
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #17
nmcgrawj said:
WHOA, i havent seen anyone of the 351's (non stroked) run 42's, but i haven't seen that many. That seems like a whole lot of fuel. I thought this combo would be tough but you guys make it sound like a beast. I still cant see getting that much power out of the parts.

The most popular i have seen with 351 combos are 30 and 36's. Feel free to shed some light on my ignorance.

Thanks

EDIT: What is blower compression? (When no blower is being used?)
Click to expand...
Assuming the heads are what the person claims they are and you buy a sufficient manifold and camshaft, the car will probably make 1.2-1.3 hp/cube at the flywheel. Cripe, I have a Hot Rod magazine where they pulled 380 horsepower out of a 351 with GT40P heads and some kind of small OTS cam. Horsepower becomes much easier to make when using a 351 instead of a 302 as a base.

Remember, fuel pressure can be regulated. This isn't like putting too much carb on a car. You could run 24 lb/hr injectors if you wanted; just crank up the fuel pressure. 36's or 42's will work well, however, I'd just use the 42's just in case.

He meant blower compression meaning low compression. Guys who use superchargers and turbos use lower compression pistons because it allows them to run more boost with that specific combination. I define low compression for anything less than 9:1.

Joe
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Aug 16, 2004
#18
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #18
oh ok i got it. Hmmm are 42's much more expensive then the others? Who makes 36's? It seems like i have only seem FRP go from 30 up to 42 and nothin in between.

BTW, i will be running the TFS 351 Intake and whatever ED comes up with the cam.
 

Jo_885o

New Member
Jul 17, 2003
422
0
0
Clint. Twp, Michigan
Aug 16, 2004
#19
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #19
o u trying to keep it on the down low huh? Are they on the car? and how much did u pay for 'em?
 

Jo_885o

New Member
Jul 17, 2003
422
0
0
Clint. Twp, Michigan
Aug 16, 2004
#20
  • Aug 16, 2004
  • #20
man u gotta keep me posted. I feel like u trying to keep secrets. lol
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
439
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
224
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?