• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

injector size?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustang88LXKid
  • Start date Start date Dec 2, 2003
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Dec 3, 2003
#21
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #21
Mustang88LXKid said:
Ok, well I have been reading the MM&FF magazine and they tested 185cc AFR heads on a normal 5.0 block that was not stroked and had a carborated setup. (I don't remember the exact issue but I can look it up). But they recomended those heads because they had over 100 horse bolt on with a new oil pan, carb, comp cam. So would I want the 165's instead, because they don't put out the same output as the 185's, but I would like to see your reponses to this.

Thank
Matt
Click to expand...
If we're thinking about the same article, that was actually a Ford Performance 333 stroker. Otherwise, it was the 165's, and even that wasn't a normal 302, it was a CHP 306. Even in AFR's add in MM&FF they advertise the 185's on a 393 stroker. Telling ya, get them if you KNOW you are going forced or NOS later (maybe!), but on a NA 302 you'll be dissappointed.
 

perkys stang

New Member
Jan 1, 2000
7,132
0
0
PA
Dec 3, 2003
#22
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #22
stangbear427 said:
Won't keep up with what?! They will support over 400HP without raising the fuel pressure from stock. You think he's gonna get anywhere near that NA?
Click to expand...


Have you ever done any research? Dyno ? Looked at the duty cycle of a 24lb injector????????

400 N/A at the crank is a cake walk these days
 

JJFIVEOH

Member
Jun 10, 2003
263
0
16
Boca Raton, FL
Dec 3, 2003
#23
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #23
The 185s need to REV. And if anybody has actually raced, the stock 302 short block can handle 7000 RPMs. In my mind 7000 is pretty high. They only need 24# injectors. It may only put out 350-400, but has anyone actually tried using 24# on a stock motor?
 

perkys stang

New Member
Jan 1, 2000
7,132
0
0
PA
Dec 3, 2003
#24
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #24
JJFIVEOH said:
The 185s need to REV. And if anybody has actually raced, the stock 302 short block can handle 7000 RPMs. In my mind 7000 is pretty high. They only need 24# injectors. It may only put out 350-400, but has anyone actually tried using 24# on a stock motor?
Click to expand...

7000 maybe on a factory tach but I wouldn't push a completely stock 302 bottom end to that RPM...

What does a stock motor and 24's have to do with his combo?
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Dec 3, 2003
#25
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #25
It has to do with this is a stock bottom end he's talking about. A mediocre cam, oversized heads and a blower intake on a NA, unstroked motor. Granted, it is always better to err on the side of caution. With injectors, it's better to be a step larger then you need at a lower pressure than a step lower than you need and higher presure b ut either way if 24# er's don't keep up with what's on his list, something else is wrong.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 3, 2003
#26
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #26
If he builds it the to get the reasonable daily driver he said he wanted originally - the 24's will be fine (along with 165's and long-runner intake). If he builds a high-revving "beach" with 185's and spyder intake - I believe I'd go with the 30's; I think that motor will outrun the 24's. But I don't think he'll be happy with that motor.
 

Mustang88LXKid

New Member
Oct 18, 2003
28
0
0
Midwest
Dec 3, 2003
#27
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #27
hmm thanks for the advice. But I got the AFR guide and 185's get peak power only a little higher than the 165s. for 185's 1500 RPM's to 6500 RPMs, which isnt really to bad. The 165's get peak at anything to 6000 RPMs. So if this helps any of you. This is the information i have gotten on my own.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 3, 2003
#28
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #28
AFR's generic guide isn't going to be as helpful to you as you think. You've got a lot of folks out here who have a lot of experience with these things which you can take advantage of if you choose to. One way or the other, I'm sure you'll figure it out. Good luck with whatever you decide.
 

perkys stang

New Member
Jan 1, 2000
7,132
0
0
PA
Dec 3, 2003
#29
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #29
Like I have been saying have you ever datalogged or watched the duty cyle of a 24 lb injector on a motor makeing any kind of power...

Example... GT40 headed , Zcam motor... 24lb injectors.. enough injector right? Wrong..

With this combo while tuning the injectors were maxed out before 5500 RPM.. This was with 45lbs of fuel pressure..

Wanna guess which ones I use?


I think you can live with the 185's but the spyder has got to go for a street car... Get the RPMII or somehting it will make killer power.. My unported Holley made power to 7200 with no problem and no loss of tq...
 

JJFIVEOH

Member
Jun 10, 2003
263
0
16
Boca Raton, FL
Dec 3, 2003
#30
  • Dec 3, 2003
  • #30
I wasnt aware that it was daily driven. Even so, the 185s wont take away that much low end torque and you can still keep the 24#s.....
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 4, 2003
#31
  • Dec 4, 2003
  • #31
Don't know what to tell you Perks - there are guys out there pushing well over 325-350 crank HP on the 19# injectors at pressures not too much more than stock with a/f ratios where they should be - indicating that the motors not running out of injector. I think part of the problem is that all injectors are not created equal. When flow tested, many 19's actually are capable of 21-22; I suspect the same up-side error occurs with some of the larger injectors too. For street cars I think the smallest injector that will get the job done should be used as the vast majority of the time you're asking the injector to function at the other end of the duty cycle scale - barely open; and the smaller injector does a better job of accurately metering small amounts of fuel than the larger one does. For the incredibly small amount of time my car (most street cars too I believe) actually spends at full throttle, I don't mind asking the injector to work pretty close to it's full duty cycle. I think this is one where we just see it differently. If I had a dedicated racer, yes, I'd go up to the next size injector to be certain; but not on a my daily driver - which is what this fellow said he wanted to build.
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Dec 4, 2003
#32
  • Dec 4, 2003
  • #32
Yeah, that was pretty much my take on it. I can see where Perk is coming from though- if his avitar is any indication, his injectors probably spend most of their life at WOT. Not necessarily applicable, talking about Z cams and whatnot when Kid specifically said no crazy camming and pretty much minor bolt ons. On the other hand, he still sounds like he's insisting on the 185's- so I have a feeling this project is going to get a lot more serious pretty quick after it's been together awhile, if not sooner...
 

Mustang88LXKid

New Member
Oct 18, 2003
28
0
0
Midwest
Dec 4, 2003
#33
  • Dec 4, 2003
  • #33
today I called CHP about all of this. They now carry AFR heads, the man I talked to told me he has a 5.0 daily driver and put in 185's and says its fine and he didn't lose and low end power. I also asked him about the spyder, he says that setup is fine and I won't lose any low end power. There's 2 different spyder intake manifolds too, I think some of you are thinking of the Super Spyder, which is for drag (I believe they used the super one in MM & FF). But they have Spyder manifold for the street. I'm now thinking about adding a CHP 331 stroker to the mix (1299.99, forged steel crank and forged steel pistons, all the rest of the kit), if I can get the funds together.....

I'm not insisting but I've made this combo idea, I just want to see the input you have.
 

TIMMY2734

Founding Member
May 17, 2002
1,330
1
36
Queens, NY
Dec 4, 2003
#34
  • Dec 4, 2003
  • #34
Mustang88LXKid said:
today I called CHP about all of this. They now carry AFR heads, the man I talked to told me he has a 5.0 daily driver and put in 185's and says its fine and he didn't lose and low end power. I also asked him about the spyder, he says that setup is fine and I won't lose any low end power. QUOTE]

Of course the tech at CHP will push for the spyder, because you are the consumer. He really doesnt care what you buy, just as long as you buy it from them. Take the advice and dont get the Spyder for your daily driver. Youd be much happier with soemthing liek the Edelbrock RPM or similar.
Click to expand...
 

JJFIVEOH

Member
Jun 10, 2003
263
0
16
Boca Raton, FL
Dec 4, 2003
#35
  • Dec 4, 2003
  • #35
I don't want to say I told you so.............
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Dec 4, 2003
#36
  • Dec 4, 2003
  • #36
Mustang88LXKid said:
today I called CHP about all of this... I'm now thinking about adding a CHP 331 stroker to the mix (1299.99, forged steel crank and forged steel pistons, all the rest of the kit), if I can get the funds together.....

I'm not insisting but I've made this combo idea, I just want to see the input you have.
Click to expand...
My input is that that's the best idea you've proposed in this thread yet. And for another $.02: I would recommend the 185's with that motor. I never said they wouldn't work on a normal 302, just that it's A LOT of money to spend on something that won't make a bit of difference- when 165's and a FTI cam with a Performer RPM intake would slap you with and extra 100HP+ easily.
 

JJFIVEOH

Member
Jun 10, 2003
263
0
16
Boca Raton, FL
Dec 4, 2003
#37
  • Dec 4, 2003
  • #37
If you are investing $$$$ already to buy aluminum heads, why not get the 185s? It's not going to hurt you but it will help you in the long run if you ever make any changes.
 

NoSloCoupes

"I would do anything for a FREE muffler"
Founding Member
Mar 4, 2000
2,705
2
58
Clinton,IL
Dec 4, 2003
#38
  • Dec 4, 2003
  • #38
Perky, you probably making 430-445hp at the crank....isn't that within range of what i hear 24# injectors will support.

I'm about to pull my 30's and t-rex to go back to 24's so i'll be faster,lol.
 

Spyderd68

Founding Member
Jun 25, 2000
935
0
26
Syracuse, NY
Dec 4, 2003
#39
  • Dec 4, 2003
  • #39
Call or check X2C Motorsports about a stroker motor, their prices cant be beat. They were very helpful to me when i was looking to buy a stroker motor.

http://www.x2cmotorsports.com/

Dave
 

86Cobra

Founding Member
Jun 6, 2000
2,064
1
0
Phoenix, AZ
Dec 5, 2003
#40
  • Dec 5, 2003
  • #40
AFR 185s kill low end torque. Yeah right. More inexperienced internet wisdom at work.

BTW, I recently stepped up to 36 lb injectors in my NA 306.

Also, ditch the spyder. CHP just wants to sell you their crap. You'll be much happier with a Holley or RPM II.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Gt40 e303 combo questions
  • 99mustanggt2018
  • Mar 30, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
408
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Mar 30, 2025
KRUISR
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Tuning help! - HEGO 2 @ 64 volts!!!
  • VenomousISA
  • Feb 20, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
241
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 26, 2025
VenomousISA
T
Resolved 1989 GT Slight Stutter Under Load
  • Tim83
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 6, 2024
Mindseye007
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?