• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Inspire me!!! Lets see some 2.3T pics!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter 88stangnut
  • Start date Start date Nov 10, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
T

turbomx6

New Member
Feb 15, 2004
38
0
0
JAX, FL
Nov 13, 2004
#21
  • Nov 13, 2004
  • #21
140cilx said:
No former Probe or MX6 ownership involved here for sure.
Click to expand...
Sorry about hijacking but...

You made it sound like its a bad thing . Probe is great car. Stinger used to own 2nd gen.

What's huffy? Sounds Mopar to me ,but I could be wrong.
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Nov 13, 2004
#22
  • Nov 13, 2004
  • #22
turbomx6 said:
Sorry about hijacking but...

You made it sound like its a bad thing . Probe is great car. Stinger used to own 2nd gen.

What's huffy? Sounds Mopar to me ,but I could be wrong.
Click to expand...

Close, its a little faster than a probe...and a mopar.
 
8

88stangnut

New Member
Dec 25, 2003
155
0
0
westfield ,mass
Nov 13, 2004
#23
  • Nov 13, 2004
  • #23
dont diss probes or mx-6 gt's, theres been a few in the 11's
 
T

turbomx6

New Member
Feb 15, 2004
38
0
0
JAX, FL
Nov 14, 2004
#24
  • Nov 14, 2004
  • #24
mr_woodster said:
Close, its a little faster than a probe...and a mopar.
Click to expand...


was it faster than this MX6 ?



Too bad it was not F2T powered , instead they used RX7 rotary engine and tranny.
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Nov 14, 2004
#25
  • Nov 14, 2004
  • #25
turbomx6 said:
Stinger used to own 2nd gen.
Click to expand...

I still do...and I picked it up after my Mustang...
 

73Runabout

New Member
Jul 29, 2003
0
0
0
Worthing, SD
Nov 17, 2004
#26
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #26
283rwhp with stock junk.

Tony Reiners
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1863.webp
    55.2 KB · Views: 200
  • IMG_1862.webp
    48 KB · Views: 212

Asha'man

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2002
1,909
0
0
Denver
Nov 17, 2004
#27
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #27
Sorry if this is a dumb question, but Tony, what upper/lower intakes are those that clear the non-dipped VC? I thought it had to be the tall SVO/Merk upper to clear.

Ash
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread 93 LX father son project
  • ZAM93LX
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 3, 2025
Scrapla347
new :poo: box, may need to hit you guys up for 79-82 info when i fix thIs turd.
  • rednotch
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
Noobz347
S
Fox New to me 82 GT
  • Stangman7082
  • Jan 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 18, 2025
AeroCoupe
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
579
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
R
8.8 rear end for '67 coupe, shortened - next steps
  • rubendenver
  • Dec 15, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
745
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 8, 2025
GOvert
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?