• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Intake and carb for my 84

  • Thread starter Thread starter sporty4680
  • Start date Start date May 11, 2005
S

sporty4680

New Member
May 10, 2005
20
0
0
MARYLAND
May 11, 2005
#1
  • May 11, 2005
  • #1
I have an all stock 84 gt 5.0. I just put a new Comp Cam 456 lift 268 Diration cam in it. I was looking at buying a used EDELBROCK PERFORMER intake with a EDELBROCK 1406 4 BARREL CARB on it. It is a 600CFM carb with a man. secondary and elec. chock. Would this be a good or bad add on to my car?

thanx
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
May 11, 2005
#2
  • May 11, 2005
  • #2
Assuming the rest of the engine is stock, that combo would be fine. Anything more than 600 cfm would be too much.
 
S

sporty4680

New Member
May 10, 2005
20
0
0
MARYLAND
May 11, 2005
#3
  • May 11, 2005
  • #3
carb

tjm73 said:
Assuming the rest of the engine is stock, that combo would be fine. Anything more than 600 cfm would be too much.
Click to expand...


do you think a man socndary would be a problem? the stock carb is a 600 cfm holey with vac secondary
 
S

sporty4680

New Member
May 10, 2005
20
0
0
MARYLAND
May 11, 2005
#4
  • May 11, 2005
  • #4
do you think a man socndary would be a problem? the stock carb is a 600 cfm holey with vac secondary
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
May 11, 2005
#5
  • May 11, 2005
  • #5
On a stick car the mech secondary should be ok, with an auto a vac secondary matches engine loading better.

I have an Edelbrock Performer RPM and a 600 cfm Holley vac secondary, 80457 setup on my carbed 82, that performs very well for the mild level of the rest of the motor. Rhodes 270 deg, .464 lift cam, C4. As noted below, it has gotten into the 12s on the motor.
 
S

sporty4680

New Member
May 10, 2005
20
0
0
MARYLAND
May 11, 2005
#6
  • May 11, 2005
  • #6
I am just wondering if this will be any improvment b eing the stock carb is a 600 cfm. I do have a 5 speed. the only changes to the car is the cam. i still have the stock exhaust other than a flowmaster.
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
May 11, 2005
#7
  • May 11, 2005
  • #7
sporty4680 said:
I am just wondering if this will be any improvment b eing the stock carb is a 600 cfm. I do have a 5 speed. the only changes to the car is the cam. i still have the stock exhaust other than a flowmaster.
Click to expand...

Yes, and the improvement will come from the intake manifold. The intake Ford used in 1984 was one step up from garbage. The step below it was a 2 barrel carb intake. The carb will help too the factory carb may be a Holley 4 barrel, but it is a smog carb and it's not exactly a hi-po unit by most people standards. The Carter/Edelbrock AFB style carb is a definite improvement as well.
 
S

sporty4680

New Member
May 10, 2005
20
0
0
MARYLAND
May 11, 2005
#8
  • May 11, 2005
  • #8
Thanx for the info. I think I will go with it. I do have to watch emissions for about 4 more years and then I can tag it historic and I will be out of the testing

scott
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
May 11, 2005
#9
  • May 11, 2005
  • #9
sporty4680 said:
Thanx for the info. I think I will go with it. I do have to watch emissions for about 4 more years and then I can tag it historic and I will be out of the testing

scott
Click to expand...


MD must be just like NY. In NY after 25 years you only need safety inspection. No emissions tests/inspections needed.
 
S

sporty4680

New Member
May 10, 2005
20
0
0
MARYLAND
May 11, 2005
#10
  • May 11, 2005
  • #10
Yup 25 years and it over and we don't have yearly inspections. one inspection when you tag it and thats it.
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
May 11, 2005
#11
  • May 11, 2005
  • #11
if your interested pm me, i have a performer collecting dust in the garage.
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
May 11, 2005
#12
  • May 11, 2005
  • #12
sporty4680 said:
Yup 25 years and it over and we don't have yearly inspections. one inspection when you tag it and thats it.
Click to expand...

Hmmm....we still have yearly inspections. Inspect once and go sounds pretty good!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
852
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
R
351w stroked to 408 CARB
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
694
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 22, 2025
General karthief
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
C
Engine Can change - valve springs also?
  • Cg’s 347
  • Feb 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 22, 2024
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?