• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

intake manifold question

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustangking101
  • Start date Start date Sep 22, 2009
M

mustangking101

New Member
Feb 22, 2009
23
0
0
AZ
Sep 22, 2009
#1
  • Sep 22, 2009
  • #1
i want to buy a power plus intake manifold soon for my 94 stang. its only 300 dollars and it says it offers the same amount of horsepower as a edelbrock rpm intake so how much horsepower would that actually be? around 20hp? thanks
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Sep 22, 2009
#2
  • Sep 22, 2009
  • #2
I'm assuming you're referring to the Professional Products Typhoon? I bet you'd see 10-15 HP tops, but you'll probably lose your low end torque.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Sep 22, 2009
#3
  • Sep 22, 2009
  • #3
mustangking101 said:
i want to buy a power plus intake manifold soon for my 94 stang. its only 300 dollars and it says it offers the same amount of horsepower as a edelbrock rpm intake so how much horsepower would that actually be? around 20hp? thanks
Click to expand...



Your heads, cam, intake should match for the best efficiency of making power. Combining parts that work in different "rpm windows" make less power than they should.


Im not gonna say to not buy the typhoon, but just dont expect it to perform at its best. But the good thing is later on when u upgrade the heads, your intake is already set to go.



Think of your final combination you'd like to have....and work towards it.
 

99FiveOh

15 Year Member
May 20, 2006
2,051
20
99
J-Ville, FL
Sep 22, 2009
#4
  • Sep 22, 2009
  • #4
I'd be willing to bet in this economy, you could probably get your hands on an Edelbrock Performer for about the same price used. I had a performer on my last car with pretty much stock motor and I loved it! It definately had better low end than the stock manifold and it pulled nicely through the RPM range.

I hear mixed reviews on the Typhoon.. I believe it's a gamble as to whether you get a good one or one that needs a little work before installation.

Good luck!
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Sep 22, 2009
#5
  • Sep 22, 2009
  • #5
The_Mustang said:
I'd be willing to bet in this economy, you could probably get your hands on an Edelbrock Performer for about the same price used. I had a performer on my last car with pretty much stock motor and I loved it! It definately had better low end than the stock manifold and it pulled nicely through the RPM range.

I hear mixed reviews on the Typhoon.. I believe it's a gamble as to whether you get a good one or one that needs a little work before installation.

Good luck!
Click to expand...

I got my polished typhoon used for $200 shipped.


And if u want a performer...then u dont "want" a typhoon. If u want a performer RPM...then u can consider a typhoon. Apples to apples.


Everyone says typhoons can come rough....but has anyone proved u need to correct one that has flaws? Before and after dyno/times down a track? Its good to say its in tip top shape, but at the end of the day if its only a small amount of HP thats affected.......u have to ask yourself does it really matter


Just looking for a bit more than people saying "oh its a gamble and u might have to correct a few things in the runners" and more like someone who ran it out of the box, had poor performance, went back corrected something, and got a gain out of it.
 

99FiveOh

15 Year Member
May 20, 2006
2,051
20
99
J-Ville, FL
Sep 22, 2009
#6
  • Sep 22, 2009
  • #6
Not so much in the runners, I've seen first hand people install these intakes and not have them seal on the heads for crap. They ended up having to get the lower machined a little so it was flat.

And I understand that the Typhoon is a direct copy of the Performer RPM, but it was suggested and is common knowledge that the standard Performer is a better compliment to stock and near stock combinations. Unfortunately, Professional Products are too stupid to realize this and go ahead and offer a Peformer version of the upper intake. Either that or Edelbrock warned them to stay away from their designs or else...lol
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 22, 2009
#7
  • Sep 22, 2009
  • #7
Both intakes aren't that hot. You can pick up a used Cobra or GT-40 for $200. Much better bargain I think.

Kurt
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Sep 22, 2009
#8
  • Sep 22, 2009
  • #8
revhead347 said:
Both intakes aren't that hot. You can pick up a used Cobra or GT-40 for $200. Much better bargain I think.

Kurt
Click to expand...

An explorer is in that ball park too....which can be had for about $150.
 

95Vert383AOD

15 Year Member
Jun 10, 2008
1,133
34
69
New Bedford, MA
Sep 22, 2009
#9
  • Sep 22, 2009
  • #9
Used Trickflow Track heat...
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Sep 22, 2009
#10
  • Sep 22, 2009
  • #10
95Vert383AOD said:
Used Trickflow Track heat...
Click to expand...

Would suck with stock heads i think... but its a great intake
 

99FiveOh

15 Year Member
May 20, 2006
2,051
20
99
J-Ville, FL
Sep 22, 2009
#11
  • Sep 22, 2009
  • #11
revhead347 said:
Both intakes aren't that hot. You can pick up a used Cobra or GT-40 for $200. Much better bargain I think.

Kurt
Click to expand...

An eddy performer has been proven many times to be a better flowing intake than any of the GT40 style intakes.

It's all about cost and what he want's to do. If he wants to tool around in a mostly stock ride, then the GT40 style intakes will do just fine. I personally had an Edelbrock Perf. on a N/A setup and a 15psi Vortech system and I loved it both ways..
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 23, 2009
#12
  • Sep 23, 2009
  • #12
I'm sure it flows a little better, but I think the difference is marginal. I just think the Edelbrock intakes are a hassle to deal with.

Kurt
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Sep 23, 2009
#13
  • Sep 23, 2009
  • #13
Not trying to stir the pot or anything

but

I found a different kind of experience with my Edel intake

All I had to do was bolt it on

No valve cover issues what so ever
No spacer needed between the upper and lower

Grady
 
S

sl03gt

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 29, 2003
182
1
18
Sep 24, 2009
#14
  • Sep 24, 2009
  • #14
I was told that quality is poor on the typhoons in general. The builder who did my neighbors motor said that alot of guys are bringing these intakes in with the heads to get done because of the price. Issues being sealing to the heads, extremely rough casting, and damaged threads that have to be helicoiled or tapped. Then on the elbow for the sn95 I saw in another thread that the opening narrows down. That is what I've heard.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Sep 24, 2009
#15
  • Sep 24, 2009
  • #15
The_Mustang said:
I'd be willing to bet in this economy, you could probably get your hands on an Edelbrock Performer for about the same price used. I had a performer on my last car with pretty much stock motor and I loved it! It definately had better low end than the stock manifold and it pulled nicely through the RPM range.
Click to expand...

My experience exactly, and I bought mine from ebay for $182!

The_Mustang said:
I hear mixed reviews on the Typhoon.. I believe it's a gamble as to whether you get a good one or one that needs a little work before installation.
Click to expand...

Yes indeed that's exactly what I've also heard. PP quality seems to be hit-and-miss.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Sep 24, 2009
#16
  • Sep 24, 2009
  • #16
final5-0 said:
Not trying to stir the pot or anything

but

I found a different kind of experience with my Edel intake

All I had to do was bolt it on

No valve cover issues what so ever
No spacer needed between the upper and lower

Grady
Click to expand...

No, I totally understand, it's a decent intake. It's just that you have to pull that side plate off everytime you pull the upper intake, and you have to order a special gasket for the upper to lower. I can have my Holley intake off in 6 minutes, and I can get a new gasket with one trip to the parts store. The Cobra and GT-40 intakes are just as easy.

Kurt
 

99FiveOh

15 Year Member
May 20, 2006
2,051
20
99
J-Ville, FL
Sep 25, 2009
#17
  • Sep 25, 2009
  • #17
You make an awesome point there Kurt, I did have that problem myself. I bought my Eddy second hand with no gaskets, so I ended up having to order them because I couldnt' find them locally.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Sep 25, 2009
#18
  • Sep 25, 2009
  • #18
Not tryin to be a know it all or anything like that
but
I don't have to get inside the plenum to install/remove my upper

I got the RPM not the Performer

Grady
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Y
BBK SSI Crossover tube
  • yaboity
  • May 17, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
19
Views
729
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 7, 2025
yaboity
Y
For Sale Hogans Racing Intake manifold for SBF
  • Bullitt347
  • Jun 7, 2025
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
0
Views
527
Engine and Power Adder Jun 7, 2025
Bullitt347
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
G
Supercharger Options 5.4 32V Intech
  • Germangazguzzler
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Other Auto Tech Apr 23, 2025
RaggedGT
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
958
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?