• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

IS A 2000 EXPLORER MOTOR CLOSE TO A 91 HO

  • Thread starter Thread starter 91 HATCH
  • Start date Start date May 17, 2007

91 HATCH

Banned
May 17, 2007
262
0
0
illinois
May 17, 2007
#1
  • May 17, 2007
  • #1
IM LOOKING AT PUTTING A 5.0 OUT OF A 2000 EXPLORER INTO MY 91 AND NEED TO KNOW IF IT IS THE SAME IF NOT WHAT IS DIFFERENT
 

BK_CAULEY

it's built for speed not longevity, woman
Dec 26, 2006
0
10
49
Thomasville, ga
May 17, 2007
#2
  • May 17, 2007
  • #2
you need a different oil pan, oil piump and pickup and all of the front accessories. and its a p headed one so p-specific headers.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
May 17, 2007
#3
  • May 17, 2007
  • #3
Does anyone know if the firing order on the cam is the same between these 2 motors?



jason
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
May 17, 2007
#4
  • May 17, 2007
  • #4
vristang said:
Does anyone know if the firing order on the cam is the same between these 2 motors?



jason
Click to expand...

Yep
 

BK_CAULEY

it's built for speed not longevity, woman
Dec 26, 2006
0
10
49
Thomasville, ga
May 17, 2007
#5
  • May 17, 2007
  • #5
millhouse said:
Yep
Click to expand...

+1 they are. just have to use the 5.0 dizzy
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
May 17, 2007
#6
  • May 17, 2007
  • #6
Be sure to use a Chilton's manual to check the firing order. If the cam is not a roller cam, then the distributor gear needs to be changed.

If the firing order is different, then the computer isn't 100% compatible. The fuel injectors will squirt at the wrong time if the firing order is different.

Most of the later model explorers used DIS (distributorles ignition), so you'll need the distributor from your 5.0 engine.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
May 17, 2007
#7
  • May 17, 2007
  • #7
The firing order is the same, but as was stated, it has the GT40P heads, so you'll need some "P" specific headers to work with that engine. You'd be better off swapping the cam to a more performance oriented one while you were working on it. The only downside to the 2000 engine versus your 91 is that you'll end up with hypereutectic pistons instead of forged. You'll also need to swap over your oil pan and oil pump pickup tube, but the pump itself is the same between the two. I have a 2000 Explorer engine in my 95 GT, so feel free to ask anything you need to know.
 
9

95GTAODE

New Member
Nov 25, 2004
200
2
0
May 17, 2007
#8
  • May 17, 2007
  • #8
StangGt got it. While you're in there, swap the Exploder cam for the HO, or a TFS stage 1. You'll end up with a motor capable of 260-300 RWHP, depending on cam choice, tune, and supporting mods. Keep in mind that any cam other than the wimpy exploder job will need upgraded valve springs. TFS makes a nice drop-in kit for $130 or so.
 

91 HATCH

Banned
May 17, 2007
262
0
0
illinois
May 18, 2007
#9
  • May 18, 2007
  • #9
thanks for the info so far. i will buy the gt40p ford headers and was thinking about the x303 or z303 cam will the valves clear the pistons with these cams. if not i will get new forged ones. i currently have a b303 cam is the x and z better.i also have the upper and lower intakes for the 2000 explorer motor how much better are these
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
May 18, 2007
#10
  • May 18, 2007
  • #10
With either of those cams, you'll definitely need to check your piston to valve clearance. I've heard that the F cam is the biggest of the FRPP cams you can run without piston modification, but you're still supposed to check clearance anyway. What made you decide on the X or Z cams? I'm sure there's better cams out there, especially with a split pattern design to help the often asthmatic exhaust ports on stock Ford heads. Also, with that much lift (.542 for the X or .552 for the Z), you'd definitely need to upgrade the springs on there, or you may have some pretty bad coil bind issues.
 

91 HATCH

Banned
May 17, 2007
262
0
0
illinois
May 18, 2007
#11
  • May 18, 2007
  • #11
i was just looking for something better than my b303 cam.is the trick flow that much better than the 303s.also how do you like your motor setup as mine will probably be close to yours - the trick flow heads and pp intake
 
9

95GTAODE

New Member
Nov 25, 2004
200
2
0
May 18, 2007
#12
  • May 18, 2007
  • #12
The TFS Stage 1 is light years ahead of the B cam... or any of the alphabets for that matter, and a little cheaper too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Engine PATS off pcm for 1999 Explorer 5.0 swap
  • GOvert
  • Dec 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
810
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 14, 2026
GOvert
G
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
896
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
M
Misfire
  • Mike3
  • May 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
92
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 30, 2026
Mike3
M
B
97 GT with 03 explorer Eddie Bauer edition 4.6l
  • basbill73
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
67
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 11, 2026
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?