• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Progress Thread Jewel Green street/strip 92 LX progress thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter HotFox
  • Start date Start date May 5, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • …
  • 13
Next
First Prev 5 of 13 Next Last

HotFox

15 Year Member
Jan 5, 2009
1,057
668
164
SE Michigan
May 9, 2011
#81
  • May 9, 2011
  • #81
Port opening only.
 
B

Boss 351

Here sthhhhhhhheeeve take a picthh of my man flowe
Jul 13, 2003
2,433
23
48
Canada
May 9, 2011
#82
  • May 9, 2011
  • #82
Holy crap, my jaw dropped at the undercarriage! I'm so jealous! Sweet ride! Awesome job you're doing!
 

HotFox

15 Year Member
Jan 5, 2009
1,057
668
164
SE Michigan
Sep 24, 2011
#83
  • Sep 24, 2011
  • #83
Just made 510rwhp 7000rpm, and 411ft lbs about 5500rpm on dyno! It has felt much stronger from last year but never figured I picked up 93hp! Guess I need a new driver at the track, new best is 11.42 in the heat of the summer at NMRA Milan, MI.

Different dyno and great air today, but still 510hp on NA 331! As comparison, also Dynoed 94 f150 5.0, auto 3.08 rear gear in drive made 168.8rwhp at about 4000rpm and 267ftlbs torque.

Scott
 

foxbodymike87

Active Member
Jul 12, 2011
739
35
39
Sep 24, 2011
#84
  • Sep 24, 2011
  • #84
Deep Jewel Green FTW!...got mine painted that color and it looks wild in the sun light.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Sep 25, 2011
#85
  • Sep 25, 2011
  • #85
Holy f**k! That is awesome. Congrats. Are you running a super victor EFI?
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Sep 25, 2011
#86
  • Sep 25, 2011
  • #86
HotFox said:
Just made 510rwhp 7000rpm, and 411ft lbs about 5500rpm on dyno! It has felt much stronger from last year but never figured I picked up 93hp! Guess I need a new driver at the track, new best is 11.42 in the heat of the summer at NMRA Milan, MI.

Different dyno and great air today, but still 510hp on NA 331! As comparison, also Dynoed 94 f150 5.0, auto 3.08 rear gear in drive made 168.8rwhp at about 4000rpm and 267ftlbs torque.

Scott
Click to expand...

That's just straight getting after it!
 

HotFox

15 Year Member
Jan 5, 2009
1,057
668
164
SE Michigan
Sep 26, 2011
#87
  • Sep 26, 2011
  • #87
dyno sheet and video. Look at that torque curve!!!! Not giving much torque up top! I need to get this thing at the track ASAP!



92 Mustang 331cid 7500rpm pull - YouTube

Scott
 

Attachments

  • DSC01917.webp
    24.1 KB · Views: 214

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Sep 26, 2011
#88
  • Sep 26, 2011
  • #88
Damn, that's cool.

Is your engine zero balanced? 7500 RPM and 500+ to the tire on a stock block would make my butt pucker!
 

HotFox

15 Year Member
Jan 5, 2009
1,057
668
164
SE Michigan
Sep 26, 2011
#89
  • Sep 26, 2011
  • #89
28oz balanced... The whole short block is Cryro treated before I assembled it maybe that will by me time/hp. Although I see a lot of guys on HC5.0 making big power on stock blocks running for years. If it brakes I will build another with a big bore 8.2" deck Dart 347".

The first was actually 475hp with the E brake on LOL

Another of the actual 510 pull with the E brake off.

EandSmotorsports's Channel - YouTube


Scott
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Sep 26, 2011
#90
  • Sep 26, 2011
  • #90
can we get an exact rundown of the old setup versus what you changed for this 510 hp run? Or just a rundown of the complete setup as it sits now.
 

HotFox

15 Year Member
Jan 5, 2009
1,057
668
164
SE Michigan
Sep 26, 2011
#91
  • Sep 26, 2011
  • #91
Current:
92 Ford Thunderbird block
10.5:1 .030 over, light SRP flat tops at 0 deck, o-ring block with stock head gasket
Forged Eagle rotating assy with I beam rods Buick bearings, .927 Chevy wrist pins
FTI (Ed Curtis) custom solid roller .664/.633 lift .238/.248 duration 110LS, installed at 108*
Trend custom 3/8 push rods
Pre bankruptcy Crane Ultra Pro SR lifters
Probe shaft 1.6:1 roller rockers, with spacers to optimize geometry
AFR205's out of box with my good springs and titinum retainers with Super Victor Intake port matched/cleaned by me and milled.
Warmed over Quick Fuel 750 Think it is about 800cfm currently
4 hole fanalic 3/4 spacer
Bassani long tubes with 1 5/8 to 1 3/4 steped.
Bassani 3" "X" pipe
3" idividual Dyno Max muffers dumped before axle
Spec Alum fly wheel
Centerforce dual friction clutch with new full face disc.
Heads flow numbers as shown above flow 300 cfm.

Old set up was with worked over AFR185s with 2.05/1.65 and Professional Products small single plane. Heads flowed 275cfm they are back a page on this thread. Made 417hp 380ftlbs, dyno sheet back a page as well.

Scott
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Sep 26, 2011
#92
  • Sep 26, 2011
  • #92
thats wierd, i have the same bassani stepeed headers as you, but mine look much different. Are you sure they are not the 1 3/4'' to 1 7/8'' stepped ones.
 

HotFox

15 Year Member
Jan 5, 2009
1,057
668
164
SE Michigan
Sep 26, 2011
#93
  • Sep 26, 2011
  • #93
oh maybe they are...all I know they are a pain to put on and do not get removed with out pulling engine since I had a skid plate welded on the bottom. Also only found that the the stainless ARP with 3/8 12 pt head work the best to install, and even that is box wrench only. I always start the outer 2 then set the engine in car which allows headers to swing to add clearence, then install the other bolts.

Yah pretty sure they are 1 3/4- 1 7/8!

scott
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Sep 26, 2011
#94
  • Sep 26, 2011
  • #94
Gotcha, i just took the 1 5/8'' to 1 3/4'' headers off my car and my 1 7/8'' accufabs are being ceramic coated right now. Im hoping to pick up some powere there, the primary on the bassani header was pretty small
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Sep 26, 2011
#95
  • Sep 26, 2011
  • #95
This is some build and that motor is stout, congrats man.
 

KHibbs

Member
Jan 11, 2011
41
0
6
Boston, MA
Sep 27, 2011
#96
  • Sep 27, 2011
  • #96
Sweet fox and awesome thread....thanks for sharing.

Are you running any kind of pan girdle on the motor or is the Thunderbird block any different from the stock mustang 5.0 block that would have been in that car. I see balancing makes a big difference for high rpm but just wondered what else was done to safely get to 7500 rpm.

....and what wrong with the color? That dark green is the best..

KHibbs
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Sep 27, 2011
#97
  • Sep 27, 2011
  • #97
KHibbs said:
Sweet fox and awesome thread....thanks for sharing.

Are you running any kind of pan girdle on the motor or is the Thunderbird block any different from the stock mustang 5.0 block that would have been in that car. I see balancing makes a big difference for high rpm but just wondered what else was done to safely get to 7500 rpm.

....and what wrong with the color? That dark green is the best..

KHibbs
Click to expand...

All late model 5.0 roller blocks are exactly the same, regardless of what car it came out of.
 

KHibbs

Member
Jan 11, 2011
41
0
6
Boston, MA
Sep 27, 2011
#98
  • Sep 27, 2011
  • #98
NikwoaC - thanks for the info and I loved your engine build thread.

KHibbs
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Sep 27, 2011
#99
  • Sep 27, 2011
  • #99
KHibbs said:
NikwoaC - thanks for the info and I loved your engine build thread.

KHibbs
Click to expand...

Thanks, man!
 

HotFox

15 Year Member
Jan 5, 2009
1,057
668
164
SE Michigan
Sep 28, 2011
#100
  • Sep 28, 2011
  • #100
ARP main studs, to run 7500+ rpm these are really light pistons, pins. I think a forged crank and rods are a must. Alum flywheel and good balancer, much more rpm and should go to 0 balance. I think the valve train is more critical, solid roller requires fair amount of spring pressure, 3/8 push rods a must, I like the shaft rockers as I feel you can get more accurate lift at each valve, there are also some geometry advantages, I prefer titanium retainers, lash caps to add surface area to valve tip. A meticulous machine shop that knows how to balance and bore and hone a block, even then I still chamfered the bottom of block to remove sharp edges that could create a crack.

yes I do not know the history of the car but that is the block that it came with, when I broke down the code on the block.

Yeah Nik get that baby tuned!

Scott
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • …
  • 13
Next
First Prev 5 of 13 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread 93 LX father son project
  • ZAM93LX
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 3, 2025
Scrapla347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
947
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
205
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
775
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?