• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

JPC Driveshaft

  • Thread starter Thread starter JTGrant
  • Start date Start date Dec 13, 2006

JTGrant

New Member
Aug 2, 2005
775
0
0
GA
Dec 13, 2006
#1
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #1
I would like to here from people who have JPC's driveshaft or a similar setup. I realize that the stock shaft weighs in at 48 lbs and the JPC is around 17 lbs. I was thinking, that much of a reduction in rotational mass would really make a diference in the performance of the car. Has anyone dynoed with a light weight shaft? Track experience?
 
W

wotfr

New Member
Apr 12, 2002
101
0
0
Des Moines ,IA
Dec 13, 2006
#2
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #2
Actually mine only weighed 39lbs, but that is still a significant amount compared to aluminum or chromoly. I have not installed my shaft yet as it is still being assembled
(parts on back order) so I can not comment on the rest but a 22lb drop in rotational mass should free up quite a few ponies.
 
P

Pro Mod

Member
Nov 16, 2005
236
0
16
Wharton, WV
Dec 13, 2006
#3
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #3
I didn't do a before/after dyno, but I can tell you that I wish I'd have done my aluminum driveshaft WAY SOONER. I think it helped more than the 4.10's, on street tires anyway. I got mine from PSI Performance. I picked up 1.05 mph after I installed my aluminum driveshaft & 4.10's... but I'll be honest, there are alot of variables in that equation. I went to a different track, air quality was probably a tad better; but to level things out, the track prep was pretty much comparable and the 4.10's IMO *slightly* hurt my trap speed because of the extra 4th gear shift. So take my 1.05 mph gain FWIW.
 

07 dmentedstang

New Member
Oct 23, 2006
6
0
0
se, mi
Dec 13, 2006
#4
  • Dec 13, 2006
  • #4
driveshaft

they did an article in mm&ff 12's ot bust, they lossed 2 tenths and 1 mph:
 

JTGrant

New Member
Aug 2, 2005
775
0
0
GA
Dec 18, 2006
#5
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #5
Just ordered the shaft today, it should be here tomorrow or Wednesday. I will post with the results.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Dec 19, 2006
#6
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #6
dyno results, or SOTP results? also, want to do a write up for the installation?
 

anthony05gt

Active Member
Mar 18, 2006
1,262
1
37
Maryland
Dec 19, 2006
#7
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #7
I've got a JPC shaft and an aluminum flywheel. What a difference! 60ft times will go down substantially with both. I did them at the same time so I can't comment on the shaft alone. I've had no vibration problems, but you should beware, that fat sucker will rub the tranny tunnel under the back seat if you are lowered too much. I'm lowered 3/4'' and had to beat a couple of dents in the tunnel to keep it from rubbing. I plan on putting an adjustable upper on and dropping the rear another 1/2'' in the future.
 

JTGrant

New Member
Aug 2, 2005
775
0
0
GA
Dec 19, 2006
#8
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #8
Yeah I talked to Justin today and he said that they are about to go to a 3.5 inch shaft for that reason (Lowered cars).
 

JTGrant

New Member
Aug 2, 2005
775
0
0
GA
Dec 19, 2006
#9
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #9
bigcat said:
dyno results, or SOTP results? also, want to do a write up for the installation?
Click to expand...


Bigcat, the only thing that I can offer right now is the SOTP feeling. I will try to work on the installation write up. The shaft arrived today, I will try and get to installing it tomorrow.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Dec 20, 2006
#10
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #10
JTGrant said:
Bigcat, the only thing that I can offer right now is the SOTP feeling. I will try to work on the installation write up. The shaft arrived today, I will try and get to installing it tomorrow.
Click to expand...

 

07 dmentedstang

New Member
Oct 23, 2006
6
0
0
se, mi
Dec 26, 2006
#11
  • Dec 26, 2006
  • #11
driveshaft

what kind of write up does someone need? it's 4 bolts to move mid pipes and a handfull on both ends of driveshaft to remove then install new one. not very hard. backyard mech can do it in half hour!
 
W

wotfr

New Member
Apr 12, 2002
101
0
0
Des Moines ,IA
Dec 26, 2006
#12
  • Dec 26, 2006
  • #12
Don't forget the two on the center, and you probably won't even need to mess w/ the exhaust depending on how high you are on jackstands. You should be able to slide the stock shaft out rearward and the new in in reverse order. That is so long as
you are not running some crazy exhaust setup.[/IMG]
 

Attachments

  • 2006_1102Image0005-1.webp
    67.4 KB · Views: 82
W

wotfr

New Member
Apr 12, 2002
101
0
0
Des Moines ,IA
Dec 26, 2006
#13
  • Dec 26, 2006
  • #13
From the rear.
 

Attachments

  • 2006_1102Image0003.webp
    47 KB · Views: 90
W

wotfr

New Member
Apr 12, 2002
101
0
0
Des Moines ,IA
Dec 26, 2006
#14
  • Dec 26, 2006
  • #14
Here is one from beneath.
 

Attachments

  • 2006_1031Image0011.webp
    20.8 KB · Views: 100

JTGrant

New Member
Aug 2, 2005
775
0
0
GA
Dec 27, 2006
#15
  • Dec 27, 2006
  • #15
okay I installed the shaft and it took a few combinations on the pinoin yoke to get the vibration out of it. I had to add a hose clamp to get the rest of the vibration out of it. I did install the shaft the way it came, but at the same time the pinon yoke on these cars are different. So that also plays a role in the balance of it all. There is an adapter on the JPC shaft that bolts to the factory pinion yoke. There was a factory mark on the pinion yoke where the factory weight on the end of the shaft would line up. So I installed a hose clamp on the pinion yoke where the factory mark was. The vibrate is almost gone. I even tried installing the shaft 180 degrees and it really made no difference.


Now onto the performance and SOTP feeling. The shaft really makes the cars accel faster. Especially off the line and midrange. I can't really feel a difference at higher rpms but maybe that is because it pulls much harder at low and midrange rpms. Over all I am very happy with the difference in performance with the new shaft. This is a must to have on these cars. I would recommed this mod to anyone. They (the driveshaft shop)are currently making a 3.5in shaft instead of the 4in, because of clearance issues on lowered cars.

Check out there website:

www.driveshaftshop.com

Or call JPC.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Dec 27, 2006
#16
  • Dec 27, 2006
  • #16
07 dmentedstang said:
what kind of write up does someone need? it's 4 bolts to move mid pipes and a handfull on both ends of driveshaft to remove then install new one. not very hard. backyard mech can do it in half hour!
Click to expand...

posts like JT's (above) are very helpful to someone trying to research a particular mod. its always the simple tips that help someone out. the same part from different manufacturers can have different installation issues, and having someone walk through it step by step allows members to prepare themselves for future mods.

also, what is simple to one person is a challenge to another. not everyone has the same automotive knowledge.
 

JTGrant

New Member
Aug 2, 2005
775
0
0
GA
Dec 27, 2006
#17
  • Dec 27, 2006
  • #17
bigcat said:
posts like JT's (above) are very helpful to someone trying to research a particular mod. its always the simple tips that help someone out. the same part from different manufacturers can have different installation issues, and having someone walk through it step by step allows members to prepare themselves for future mods.
Click to expand...



Also those four simple bolts take a while to run down because of the clearance between the u-joint and where the bolts go. You can't run the down with a socket, you must run them down with an open end wrench and then run them down with a ratchet wrench or a socket and ratchet. That is whatt takes most of the time. Then when you must removed the shaft to rotate it. It is an even more of a pain in the ass to run them out becuase of the lock tight. There was no instructions on torque specs but:

Use locktight on all bolts
4 bolts where the shaft meets the trans 76 ft lb (Factory specs)

6 bolts where the adapter bolts to the pinion yoke 60 ft lb in steps and star pattern

4 bolts where shaft meets adaptor 50 fi lbs in a star pattern
 

JTGrant

New Member
Aug 2, 2005
775
0
0
GA
Dec 27, 2006
#18
  • Dec 27, 2006
  • #18
edit
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
248
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
Drive Shaft/Rear Diff Issue on 2014 GT
  • DudeStang
  • Jun 16, 2025
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
11
Views
1K
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Jan 21, 2026
gkomo
P
Progress Thread Weight loss 90s coupe . -500lbs
  • ponixpress
  • Mar 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 13, 2025
ponixpress
P
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
685
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
How Many Runs For A Built C-4
  • 93gtmustang
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
615
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 15, 2025
revhead347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?