kenne bell dyno numbers

jj89fox

Member

Jan 7, 2010

57

0

6

Apr 28, 2010

#1

• Apr 28, 2010

• #1

just got my car tuned today here are the new numbers 359.41 rwhp & 419.52 rwt YouTube - Fox mustang on the dyno

 

Attachments

• 2010-04-28 17.45.53.webp

  88.8 KB · Views: 228

Tanus

New Member

Dec 11, 2009

847

1

0

A to the Z

Apr 28, 2010

#2

• Apr 28, 2010

• #2

nice, no graph?

 

jj89fox

Member

Jan 7, 2010

57

0

6

Apr 28, 2010

#3

• Apr 28, 2010

• #3

The only problem i have now is first and second gear are worthless but so so much fun. Time for some drag radials

 

Tanus

New Member

Dec 11, 2009

847

1

0

A to the Z

Apr 28, 2010

#4

• Apr 28, 2010

• #4

Id just get slicks(ET street slicks), in my experiences they last longer than DR's on the street

 

NIKwoaC

中國製造

15 Year Member

Oct 31, 2006

5,525

943

214

Chengdu Province

Apr 28, 2010

#5

• Apr 28, 2010

• #5

I take it you got the A/F issue under control? Numbers look good. That's a stock long block, right?

 

jj89fox

Member

Jan 7, 2010

57

0

6

Apr 28, 2010

#6

• Apr 28, 2010

• #6

Yes stock E7 heads & block

 

MY 85 GT

10 Year Member

Mar 7, 2008

1,852

208

104

New Jersey

Apr 28, 2010

#7

• Apr 28, 2010

• #7

Nice numbers:nice Im glad you got it all worked out...Now go get some drag radials or slicks You need them!!!!!!

 

S&B

I hate my CT. :(

10 Year Member

Dec 18, 2005

1,634

695

204

Cheesehead

Apr 29, 2010

#8

• Apr 29, 2010

• #8

great numbers if you have a T5 you better start saving for a tremec

 

1990Coupe

Founding Member

Mar 11, 2002

1,462

132

114

Toms River NJ

Apr 29, 2010

#9

• Apr 29, 2010

• #9

Stock cam too? nice numbers!

 

R

RatStang

New Member

Feb 11, 2010

544

0

0

Apr 29, 2010

#10

• Apr 29, 2010

• #10

How much boost and which kit are you running? Stock TB too?

 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter

Oct 7, 2003

3,596

350

134

Apr 29, 2010

#11

• Apr 29, 2010

• #11

Must be fun on the street, what did it make untuned again?

 

9

92GreenGT

PEAT

Founding Member

Jul 18, 2002

2,085

1

46

Big Stone Gap, VA

Apr 29, 2010

#12

• Apr 29, 2010

• #12

90lxcoupe said:

Must be fun on the street, what did it make untuned again?

Click to expand...

I went back and looked and he removed the dyno sheet but comments in the thread said "300rwhp" so it must of been in the 300-310 range.

Guess all the people who said he would pick up power with a tune were for sure idiots.

 

R

RatStang

New Member

Feb 11, 2010

544

0

0

Apr 29, 2010

#13

• Apr 29, 2010

• #13

92GreenGT said:

I went back and looked and he removed the dyno sheet but comments in the thread said "300rwhp" so it must of been in the 300-310 range.

Guess all the people who said he would pick up power with a tune were for sure idiots.

Click to expand...

I don't get it... dyno shows 359 at the wheels. Looks like a 59 RWHP gain then?

or was that sarcasm?

 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter

Oct 7, 2003

3,596

350

134

Apr 29, 2010

#14

• Apr 29, 2010

• #14

92GreenGT said:

I went back and looked and he removed the dyno sheet but comments in the thread said "300rwhp" so it must of been in the 300-310 range.

Guess all the people who said he would pick up power with a tune were for sure idiots.

Click to expand...

yea i thought it was 310, guess we were wrong after all.

those are some pretty respectable numbers for a stock motor though

 

NIKwoaC

中國製造

15 Year Member

Oct 31, 2006

5,525

943

214

Chengdu Province

Apr 29, 2010

#15

• Apr 29, 2010

• #15

DontGivaRatz said:

or was that sarcasm?

Click to expand...

I would think so.

To further stir the pot, I'd like to see what his A/F numbers are now. Wasn't that the argument last time?

 

R

RatStang

New Member

Feb 11, 2010

544

0

0

Apr 29, 2010

#16

• Apr 29, 2010

• #16

NikwoaC said:

I would think so.

To further stir the pot, I'd like to see what his A/F numbers are now. Wasn't that the argument last time?

Click to expand...

I think it was more a miscommunication than an actual argument. Someone said something about AFR not exactly right (didn't explain well) and many others jumped on the superiority bandwagon to beat him down. I think that's the thread you're talking about. lol

 

9

92GreenGT

PEAT

Founding Member

Jul 18, 2002

2,085

1

46

Big Stone Gap, VA

Apr 29, 2010

#17

• Apr 29, 2010

• #17

DontGivaRatz said:

or was that sarcasm?

Click to expand...

Swing and a miss.

 

jj89fox

Member

Jan 7, 2010

57

0

6

Apr 29, 2010

#18

• Apr 29, 2010

• #18

I have stock E7 heads & cam, 70mm throttle body, mac headers, no cats, no air pump, 2 1/2 flow masters, 42lbs injectors, 76mm maf that is maxed out ,cold air kit, 255 fuel pump, 3.55 gears 2.2L kenne bell with the air 2 air setup making 10psi

 

NIKwoaC

中國製造

15 Year Member

Oct 31, 2006

5,525

943

214

Chengdu Province

Apr 30, 2010

#19

• Apr 30, 2010

• #19

What were the final A/F numbers?

 

67coupe

Founding Member

Apr 5, 2002

658

402

93

Huntsville, AL

Apr 30, 2010

#20

• Apr 30, 2010

• #20

I wondered if this was the same car. Nice numbers!

In his original thread, the A/F was above 14 getting as high as 16 under load. Mass confusion followed...lean is mean statements...etc.

OP, no changes other than a tune? Same pulley setup? Change anything in the fuel system? Once again, great numbers!!