kenne bell dyno numbers

[jj89fox]

just got my car tuned today here are the new numbers 359.41 rwhp & 419.52 rwt YouTube - Fox mustang on the dyno

 

[Tanus]

nice, no graph?

 

[jj89fox]

The only problem i have now is first and second gear are worthless but so so much fun. Time for some drag radials

 

[Tanus]

Id just get slicks(ET street slicks), in my experiences they last longer than DR's on the street

 

[NIKwoaC]

I take it you got the A/F issue under control? Numbers look good. That's a stock long block, right?

 

[jj89fox]

Yes stock E7 heads & block

 

[MY 85 GT]

Nice numbers:nice Im glad you got it all worked out...Now go get some drag radials or slicks You need them!!!!!!

 

[S&B]

great numbers if you have a T5 you better start saving for a tremec

 

[1990Coupe]

Stock cam too? nice numbers!

 

[RatStang]

How much boost and which kit are you running? Stock TB too?

 

[90lxcoupe]

Must be fun on the street, what did it make untuned again?

 

[92GreenGT]

Must be fun on the street, what did it make untuned again?

I went back and looked and he removed the dyno sheet but comments in the thread said "300rwhp" so it must of been in the 300-310 range.

Guess all the people who said he would pick up power with a tune were for sure idiots.

 

[RatStang]

I went back and looked and he removed the dyno sheet but comments in the thread said "300rwhp" so it must of been in the 300-310 range.

Guess all the people who said he would pick up power with a tune were for sure idiots.

I don't get it... dyno shows 359 at the wheels. Looks like a 59 RWHP gain then?

or was that sarcasm?

 

[90lxcoupe]

I went back and looked and he removed the dyno sheet but comments in the thread said "300rwhp" so it must of been in the 300-310 range.

Guess all the people who said he would pick up power with a tune were for sure idiots.

yea i thought it was 310, guess we were wrong after all.

those are some pretty respectable numbers for a stock motor though

 

[NIKwoaC]

or was that sarcasm?

I would think so.

To further stir the pot, I'd like to see what his A/F numbers are now. Wasn't that the argument last time?

 

[RatStang]

I would think so.

To further stir the pot, I'd like to see what his A/F numbers are now. Wasn't that the argument last time?

I think it was more a miscommunication than an actual argument. Someone said something about AFR not exactly right (didn't explain well) and many others jumped on the superiority bandwagon to beat him down. I think that's the thread you're talking about. lol

 

[92GreenGT]

or was that sarcasm?

Swing and a miss.

 

[jj89fox]

I have stock E7 heads & cam, 70mm throttle body, mac headers, no cats, no air pump, 2 1/2 flow masters, 42lbs injectors, 76mm maf that is maxed out ,cold air kit, 255 fuel pump, 3.55 gears 2.2L kenne bell with the air 2 air setup making 10psi

 

[NIKwoaC]

What were the final A/F numbers?

 

[67coupe]

I wondered if this was the same car. Nice numbers!

In his original thread, the A/F was above 14 getting as high as 16 under load. Mass confusion followed...lean is mean statements...etc.

OP, no changes other than a tune? Same pulley setup? Change anything in the fuel system? Once again, great numbers!!