Grady,
that just seemed like a lot of base timing...but of course, he's running aluminum heads so I guess that would help out a bit.
Well Clay
it is just not a ........ simple thing as you well know
A dizzy twister can't be compared to a spark table adjuster
cause
Both methods are not on an apples to apples comparison.
SBF's have been making the best WOT power for decades
at 36 total advance ... give or take a few

sooooo
Trying that rule of thumb with the dizzy twisting method of tuning .....
You would need 11 more to add to the 25 in the spark table
Since the pcm can add more spark during light loads
You'll most likely encounter the ping thing
WAY before reaching a dizzy setting of that value
therefore
You can't always go for the optimum total WOT advance value
without
Suffering with values too high during low/mid level load driving conditions
Here is where the big difference lies between the two methods
A fellow with pcm access just has more options.
and
He needs to think differently to take advantage of those options.
Grady
