• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Lets compare the New 2005-2008 Stangs to the Fox stangs...

  • Thread starter Thread starter MustangOwner
  • Start date Start date Nov 5, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Nov 7, 2007
#41
  • Nov 7, 2007
  • #41
ill advised said:
Looking over this thread there I really don't see alot of people who would disagree with that. Some people, myself for example, may "prefer" the Fox bod but can still acknowledge the advantages the S197 has over them
Click to expand...


Yeah we're also comparing a 20+ year old car to a brand new car. You may as well compare them to any brand new front engine/rear wheel drive car and you'd get similar results. There's more to life than refinement and cabin noise, otherwise the "classics" would just be old out dated pieces of crap and Barrett Jackson wouldn't be selling 6 figure muscle cars.
 

fiveohlxhatch

New Member
Sep 18, 2007
27
0
0
Nov 7, 2007
#42
  • Nov 7, 2007
  • #42
I wonder if the 641/2-67 guys blasted the 87-93 Fox when it came out back in the day? Seems like a similar comparison to what people are doing between our cars and the S197 today.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 7, 2007
#43
  • Nov 7, 2007
  • #43
There is also more to life than all out power
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Nov 7, 2007
#44
  • Nov 7, 2007
  • #44
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Yeah we're also comparing a 20+ year old car to a brand new car. You may as well compare them to any brand new front engine/rear wheel drive car and you'd get similar results. There's more to life than refinement and cabin noise, otherwise the "classics" would just be old out dated pieces of crap and Barrett Jackson wouldn't be selling 6 figure muscle cars.
Click to expand...

It's not the 20-year-old age of a particular car in question that puts the Fox at a major disadvantage when compared to the S197, it's the now 29-year-old age of the way out of date design itself that seals that fate. The age and condition of a particular vehicle itself is just another thing working against the value of any Fox in question, it has nothing to do with what makes one the "better car" over the other. And if you honestly think the differences between a Fox and an S197 are limited to just refinement and cabin noise, then you're running with blinders on and there's no helping you.

And the reason the "Classics" are going for 6-figures with Barrett Jackson aren't because they were the better car. It's because they were among the originators of the affordable sports coupe and muscle car era and also because of their limited production run. The nearly 900,000 Fox's that rolled off the assembly line during the course of it's run that ensures it will never be a collectable and worth no where near what the classics were. Only the owners of these cars themselves really place any sort of value on them, and even then that's only from a nostalgic standpoint.

The rest of the world considers them cars built to bet by during the low point of the 80’s American Automobile revolution. They were built sporty and cheap using an existing parts and designs to minimize costs and increase production value. Ford certainly didn’t have high quality, a cutting edge design or a serious sports car in mind when they “threw” the Fox bodies together, nor did any of the big three Manufacturers at the time. It was honestly a fluke that the Fox took off the way it did and I’m sure nobody expected them to be as successful as they were.

I have absolutely no problem with someone loving their Fox for the nostalgic value, the familiar rough edges, the great bang for the buck performance, the inexpensive maintenance or the high availability of parts and low over all cost. I myself loved my old Fox for just those same reasons, which is why it will always hold a soft spot in my heart, but things are changing. Loving your car for all the reason I just stated is certainly warranted from a “personal preference” standpoint, but don’t let that fool you into thinking they’re in any way, shape or form superior to or even equal to the standards or performance of the newer breed, because they just aren’t!
 

ill advised

Member
Apr 29, 2003
656
10
19
West L.A.
Nov 7, 2007
#45
  • Nov 7, 2007
  • #45
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Yeah we're also comparing a 20+ year old car to a brand new car. You may as well compare them to any brand new front engine/rear wheel drive car and you'd get similar results. There's more to life than refinement and cabin noise, otherwise the "classics" would just be old out dated pieces of crap and Barrett Jackson wouldn't be selling 6 figure muscle cars.
Click to expand...
Like I said, I prefer the Fox.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
For Sale 2008 Mustang Bullitt for sale Richmond Hill, ON, Canada L4C 0S3
  • ROHDRNNR
  • Jun 10, 2026
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
0
Views
146
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Jun 10, 2026
ROHDRNNR
R
K
Fox body swapped sn95
  • Konstang
  • Apr 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
582
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2025
95BlueStallion
Progress Thread Epaws Fox
  • Mchabot87
  • Oct 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
72
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 31, 2026
Mchabot87
G
New, 2005 Red V6 Convertible
  • Ginger2005
  • Jan 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
392
The Welcome Wagon Jan 4, 2026
2Blue2
Old guy new to Forum.
  • 08shelby GT500
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
149
The Welcome Wagon Jun 15, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?