• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Long Tube Diffrences?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RoadconeTuning
  • Start date Start date Apr 11, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

Turbo92PGT

Member
Feb 17, 2003
746
0
16
Auburn Washington
Apr 12, 2007
#21
  • Apr 12, 2007
  • #21
I have BBK long tubes , BBK matching O/R X Pipe and a mac Catback

My friends bullitt has BBK Long tubes, Mac PROCHAMBER and SLP LM2

My friends 96 GT has FLOWTECH longtubes and BBK X pipe (muffler shop made) and flowmaster 40's

In order to remove your transmission the RIGHT BBK header will have to be removed. I know this first hand. The flowtechs will allow the transmission to drop without removing them. However, his are about 6 months older than mine and are rusty and nasty looking. My CHROME BBK's look great, except where I bottom them out.

The flowtech slip joint leaks a little bit, not bad though. The BBK longtubes will not allow a maximum motorsports k member brace if your car is lowered. This brace must be spaced about an inch lower than normal, and will bottom out way too easily.

Either way you go, I highly recommend stage 8 locking header bolts. Look on ebay or summit.

I have them on my car and yes it makes the install/ removal more difficult but my headers dont leak at all. My friend bullitt leaks quite a bit, and my friend with the 96 GT used to leak and has had to be retightened quite a few times

Andy
 
S

SilverBullet00

New Member
Jul 5, 2004
1,150
0
0
Wichita, KS
Apr 12, 2007
#22
  • Apr 12, 2007
  • #22
Quality on parts can be hit or miss. The best thing you can do is choose a reputable brand and take your time and install them correctly.

And by the way, LTs, H pipe, and flows sounds AWESOME. I would kill for my old setup back, I miss the drone
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Apr 13, 2007
#23
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #23
Well the last thing I will say on the subject is that there is a "mods you regret" thread on SVTP and headers are the most popular item mentioned in that thread

There are better ways to spend that kind of money... But it IS your money and it IS your car. Good luck I hope the headers work out for you

Here is the "mods you regret" thread: http://www.svtperformance.com/forums/showthread.php?t=141756
 

invertmast

Founding Member
Dec 12, 2001
379
0
16
North Port, FL
Apr 13, 2007
#24
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #24
Kyle,
you know what i've told ya.. but i'll put in my 2 cents for all these guys.

The trans IS ABLE TO be removed with BOTH headers on in the case of BBK's.. i have done it 3 times now and it is NOT the easiest thing to do, but it IS possible.

Mac headers do NOT allow you to drop the tranny and even the HTS coated ones started rusting like a Beeatch after a year.

Kooks are AWESOME but they are expensive. The slip fit has a very small leak but nothing that can't be overcomed. The bad part... they dont have any flange on the collector so you have to have a prochamber, H pipe, X pipe.. whatever custom fit.. Which can be a good thing b/c you can have your current prochamber shortened and widened to fit these headers.

Hedman and flowpath i have no personal experience with but friends have told me the tubing is very thin and the coating is gone after 10 minutes of run time and rusting begins immediately there after, so i wouldn't waste the time on these.

of the BBk's i've installed. 2 went one w/o any hitches, the 3rd (which was getting installed on a 98 cobra) was a major PITA b/c the mounting flange to the head was much to large and didn't allow the header to be placed into position w/o grinding 1/8" of the corner of the flange off.
Mac's were ok to install, nothing really to odd, except that the steering shaft was extremely close and under the right conditions rubbed the header.

The kooks fit awesome, both sets w/ just a little PITA (pain in the ass) w/o any rubbing anywhere and no intereference w/ the K member brace.


that being said.. start racking your brain on what you want
 

Stang|ess

seeking cyber partner(s)
Oct 18, 2003
941
0
37
Hawaii
Apr 13, 2007
#25
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #25
invertmast said:
Mac headers do NOT allow you to drop the tranny and even the HTS coated ones started rusting like a Beeatch after a year.
Click to expand...

You can drop the tranny with Macs, Bassanis, Hooker/Flowtech, Kooks, and now apparently BBK.

No argument from me about their crappy coating.
 

Stang|ess

seeking cyber partner(s)
Oct 18, 2003
941
0
37
Hawaii
Apr 13, 2007
#26
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #26
Kilgore Trout said:
Well the last thing I will say on the subject is that there is a "mods you regret" thread on SVTP and headers are the most popular item mentioned in that thread

There are better ways to spend that kind of money... But it IS your money and it IS your car. Good luck I hope the headers work out for you

Here is the "mods you regret" thread: http://www.svtperformance.com/forums/showthread.php?t=141756
Click to expand...


Site is being slow, but at the end of page 4, I counted 4 people who regret it. Mainly because they paid for someone to install it for them (expensive), and not well enough (they leak). I've read that LTs do nothing for 03/04 Cobras, but for GTs the power we see is greatly needed. Not just peak power, but power throughout the ENTIRE powerband.
 
S

SilverBullet00

New Member
Jul 5, 2004
1,150
0
0
Wichita, KS
Apr 13, 2007
#27
  • Apr 13, 2007
  • #27
invertmast said:
Kooks are AWESOME but they are expensive. The slip fit has a very small leak but nothing that can't be overcomed. The bad part... they dont have any flange on the collector so you have to have a prochamber, H pipe, X pipe.. whatever custom fit.. Which can be a good thing b/c you can have your current prochamber shortened and widened to fit these headers.
Click to expand...

The kooks have a flange on the collector. I dont know if the PC will mate up with the headers or not, though.
 

MarcoCapone

Member
Aug 6, 2003
44
0
6
Apr 14, 2007
#28
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #28
I really dont understand people saying that modding a GT is useless...If its so useless why Am I running 14 sec@101 mph on an almost stock GT and people with full-bolt on can run mid to low 12? I always tought that much of the fun was making the car faster not having the fastest car....
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Apr 14, 2007
#29
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #29
MarcoCapone said:
I really dont understand people saying that modding a GT is useless...
Click to expand...
Why would you say that modding a GT is useless? That does not even make sense. Lots of people mod their GT with mods that make sense and get great results in looks and performance. You need to talk to some of the people that do not have stock GTs before you say that modding the GT is useless dood...
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Apr 14, 2007
#30
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #30
Kilgore Trout said:
Headers reduce low end torque.

Not sure where you are getting "you do not enjoy putting aftermarket parts on your car" perhaps you are thinking of GT owning Kilgore... Cobra owning Kilgore does not have that problem See sig for details...
Click to expand...


Where are you getting your info from? That SVTP thread where out of 16 pages 1 person per page didn't like a header because they spent too much and they leak? It is widely known that Longtubes increase low and midrange power. Everytime I come on here, there is always some jibber that is completely wrong and defies what every other site, race shop and well respected and known engine builder says and recommends.

In both 4V's I have owned and installed Longtubes(BBK on my 99 and Flowtech on my 97), there has been a big gain in low and midrange power. I have yet to see a 4V owner say they lost low end power or torque from installing Longtubes and I been involved on these sites since 1999.
 

invertmast

Founding Member
Dec 12, 2001
379
0
16
North Port, FL
Apr 14, 2007
#31
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #31
Stang|ess said:
You can drop the tranny with Macs, Bassanis, Hooker/Flowtech, Kooks, and now apparently BBK.

No argument from me about their crappy coating.
Click to expand...



maybe with a GT... but not on a cobra
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Apr 14, 2007
#32
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #32
I just dropped the trans on my 4 Valve with Hooker LT's
 

invertmast

Founding Member
Dec 12, 2001
379
0
16
North Port, FL
Apr 14, 2007
#33
  • Apr 14, 2007
  • #33
01Steeda said:
I just dropped the trans on my 4 Valve with Hooker LT's
Click to expand...

sorry.. i was referencing to the Mac's
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Apr 15, 2007
#34
  • Apr 15, 2007
  • #34
ahh, ok. I am not sure about those on a cobra. I had them on my 2 valve but never had to drop the trans.
 

Poisoned Pony

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2000
286
0
17
Citrus Heights, CA
Apr 15, 2007
#35
  • Apr 15, 2007
  • #35
well, I just had BBK LT's and X-pipe installed on my GT. I iwsh I could report on good they are, but I know for sure til I get to see them in November. I bought them based on recommendations on here and MD though
 
R

RoadconeTuning

New Member
Apr 4, 2006
458
0
0
Upstate, SC
Apr 15, 2007
#36
  • Apr 15, 2007
  • #36
invertmast said:
Kyle,
you know what i've told ya.. but i'll put in my 2 cents for all these guys.

The trans IS ABLE TO be removed with BOTH headers on in the case of BBK's.. i have done it 3 times now and it is NOT the easiest thing to do, but it IS possible.

Mac headers do NOT allow you to drop the tranny and even the HTS coated ones started rusting like a Beeatch after a year.

Kooks are AWESOME but they are expensive. The slip fit has a very small leak but nothing that can't be overcomed. The bad part... they dont have any flange on the collector so you have to have a prochamber, H pipe, X pipe.. whatever custom fit.. Which can be a good thing b/c you can have your current prochamber shortened and widened to fit these headers.

Hedman and flowpath i have no personal experience with but friends have told me the tubing is very thin and the coating is gone after 10 minutes of run time and rusting begins immediately there after, so i wouldn't waste the time on these.

of the BBk's i've installed. 2 went one w/o any hitches, the 3rd (which was getting installed on a 98 cobra) was a major PITA b/c the mounting flange to the head was much to large and didn't allow the header to be placed into position w/o grinding 1/8" of the corner of the flange off.
Mac's were ok to install, nothing really to odd, except that the steering shaft was extremely close and under the right conditions rubbed the header.

The kooks fit awesome, both sets w/ just a little PITA (pain in the ass) w/o any rubbing anywhere and no intereference w/ the K member brace.


that being said.. start racking your brain on what you want
Click to expand...


yes, your kooks SUCKED for install! but they are a bit diffrent LOL

im thinking im going to go with the BBK Longtubes and H... just so i dont have to worry about rust.
 

invertmast

Founding Member
Dec 12, 2001
379
0
16
North Port, FL
Apr 15, 2007
#37
  • Apr 15, 2007
  • #37
RoadconeTuning said:
yes, your kooks SUCKED for install! but they are a bit diffrent LOL

im thinking im going to go with the BBK Longtubes and H... just so i dont have to worry about rust.
Click to expand...


good choice.. BBK would of been my choice.. now you need to get rid of that H idea and get an X .. ooorrr we can always modify that prochamber you have to fit the longtubes.

so when we installing these things?
 

02LaserRed2V

New Member
Jul 30, 2004
379
1
0
Augusta, GA
Apr 15, 2007
#38
  • Apr 15, 2007
  • #38
I have MAC ceramic coated longtubes on mine for over a year & 1/2 and they still still look new. FWIW I gained 30rwhp with the MAC longtubes and VRS O/R X-pipe.
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Apr 15, 2007
#39
  • Apr 15, 2007
  • #39
Mac gets a bad rap here on stangnet. alot of other forums dont have issues with them. It is the herd mentality, once you hear it said once or twice everyone agrees without even having a clue.

My macs fit (even the steering column) without any rubbing and performed great.
 
R

RoadconeTuning

New Member
Apr 4, 2006
458
0
0
Upstate, SC
Apr 16, 2007
#40
  • Apr 16, 2007
  • #40
im going off of sound, Mac's sound like they flow like a turd moving thru a pipe full of spikes... atleast thats how it sounds on a 5.0 when compared to BBK...

If i do an X-pipe i dont want to keep the flows, that sounds like crap.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
689
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
B
Fox Phenolic spacer on Systemax intake. Are long tube headers worth it?
  • Brent Francis
  • Aug 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 7, 2023
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Progress Thread 88 Notched Fox
  • NotchedGarage
  • Jul 15, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2024
Flyboy60
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?