• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Longtube vs. Shortie Headers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brodach
  • Start date Start date Mar 1, 2004
B

Brodach

New Member
Feb 29, 2004
19
1
3
Texas
Mar 1, 2004
#1
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #1
What is the real difference between LT and Shortie headers? I mean performance wise what does one do that the other one doesn't? Also, anyone know if most x-pipes are created equal? or are certain ones just crap and other ones really good? Trying to research some more of this stuff but can't seem to get alotta info. Thanks

Brodach
'03 GT Premium 5-speed
No mods, yet...
 
J

just some guy

Founding Member
Sep 23, 2002
723
0
0
FL
Mar 1, 2004
#2
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #2
get longtubes...more worth the money, go with a dr. gas x pipe.
 

WRXracer

New Member
Feb 28, 2003
825
0
0
Mar 1, 2004
#3
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #3
um

I think long tubes give power while shortys do nothing..
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Mar 1, 2004
#4
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #4
on supercharged applications, shorties WILL show gains. on N/A applications, just get LT's unless you live in treehuggerfornia.
 
0

03GTnewbie

New Member
Jul 18, 2003
34
0
0
East Tenn
Mar 1, 2004
#5
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #5
Not to mention the LT's have a wicked sound also. I love the way they sound but I can't use them because I have an auto or so I am told. I wish I could because I have a friend that has Lt's an Dr Gas X and Flows. It just makes me wet my pants when I here it.
 
B

Brodach

New Member
Feb 29, 2004
19
1
3
Texas
Mar 1, 2004
#6
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #6
Good, thats what I was plannin' on doin', but thought I'd check ahead of time -- LTs + Dr Gas o/r X pipe, and either Bassani or Borla cat back.
What are/Where can I get some decent LTs at a good price? I think I saw some Mac LTs somewhere for around like $320 a pair...

Brodach
 

99prmustang

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
141
0
0
Mar 1, 2004
#7
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #7
03GTnewbie said:
Not to mention the LT's have a wicked sound also. I love the way they sound but I can't use them because I have an auto or so I am told. I wish I could because I have a friend that has Lt's an Dr Gas X and Flows. It just makes me wet my pants when I here it.
Click to expand...

you cant use longtubes with auto's??? why not?
 
B

Blue1

New Member
Feb 2, 2004
23
0
0
Mar 1, 2004
#8
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #8
WRXracer said:
I think long tubes give power while shortys do nothing..
Click to expand...

You're kidding, right?

5.0s get more power from shorty aftermarket headers, and they come stock with tube headers.

I understand that a 4.6 may have fairly efficient exhaust manifolds, but they can't touch a well designed set of headers, even shorties.

I figure a good set of shorties and a K&N air filter are worth at least 20 HP on a '99 and up GT.

Blue
 

Atlanta_GTer

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2001
866
0
0
I think the name gives it away
Mar 1, 2004
#9
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #9
I have JBA stainless shorties, Dr. Gas X and Flowmaster "American Thunder" catback. Absolutely an unbeatable combination. The unique thing about the shorties is they actually sound a bit different than the longtubes WITH the same X and catback. 2 other T&J guys are running the Dr. Gas and AT catback with longtubes. Sound great, but for whatever reason I actually enjoy the sound of mine better with the shorties. A bit deeper than the LT setup.
Besides that, I still say LTs for N/A, but shorties will show just as much gain on a S/C application. This has been proven.
 

dkshadow

Banned
May 12, 2003
952
0
0
TEXAS
Mar 1, 2004
#10
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #10
99prmustang said:
you cant use longtubes with auto's??? why not?
Click to expand...
Actually you can. Theres only a few companies that make Long tubes for Automatics though. I believe Mac and Hooker are one of the Companies that make a good set for the automatics.
 
0

03GTnewbie

New Member
Jul 18, 2003
34
0
0
East Tenn
Mar 1, 2004
#11
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #11
dkshadow said:
Actually you can. Theres only a few companies that make Long tubes for Automatics though. I believe Mac and Hooker are one of the Companies that make a good set for the automatics.
Click to expand...

Great to hear that. I will have to check those out. I was looking at some catalogs from Bro's Performace and Dallas Mustang and all the LT's they had said for 5 speed only. Thats why I didn't think I could LT's for an auto.
 
S

SteedaV8

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
127
0
0
Jackson,Nj
Mar 1, 2004
#12
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #12
I think i have decided to get lt also since i dont think i will have the money for a supercharger anytime soon. I was looking at the reviews for the macs and they dont look to good. Does anyone have any other suggestions. I already have the borla/steeda side exhuast so what x pipe do you guys think will go best. To be honest I love the sound of just the side exhuast right now but I know it could get that much better. Thanks alot
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Mar 1, 2004
#13
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #13
For the effort of installing headers, there is no reason other than emissions to install shorties. Get the Long tubes if you dont have to worry about Echeck.
 

hognutz

New Member
Nov 12, 2002
1,940
0
0
albany, oregon
Mar 1, 2004
#14
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #14
it is all about you torque. longtubes make more low end torque. they usually make more power also due to the fact there are really no good shorties out there for 99+. they are however a bigger pain to install.

as far as xpipes the dr. gas is the best power. I got the vrs because I wanted a stainless pipe.

my .02 would be go midlenght. bassani or JBA is releasing some soon. I dont like the fact that hooker is the only longtube that allows tranny removal. they have slip collecters that look like a pain in the ass to me. some people swear by them though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
688
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Intended Headers and Trans, questions about fitment
  • from6to8
  • Aug 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2025
from6to8
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?