• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Looking for Hedman Header part #

  • Thread starter Thread starter spfd
  • Start date Start date Apr 8, 2013
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

spfd

Member
Mar 2, 2011
33
0
6
Union County, New Jersey.
Apr 8, 2013
#1
  • Apr 8, 2013
  • #1
I have a 1967 Mustang with a 1993 5.0 litter engine and T5, 5-speed trans with a Moderern Driveline cable clutch. Does anyone know a part # for the Hedman long tube headers that will work with this combo?

Thanks, John.
 

Smitten65

Member
Jan 7, 2011
57
4
19
FL
Apr 9, 2013
#2
  • Apr 9, 2013
  • #2
I used an #88306 in a 65, with the same combo. Should work fine for you too.
 

spfd

Member
Mar 2, 2011
33
0
6
Union County, New Jersey.
Apr 9, 2013
#3
  • Apr 9, 2013
  • #3
Thank you so much!
 

Smitten65

Member
Jan 7, 2011
57
4
19
FL
Apr 9, 2013
#4
  • Apr 9, 2013
  • #4
The 88300 is the painted version of the 88306. Same tube design. Sounds nice with an H pipe too.
 

spfd

Member
Mar 2, 2011
33
0
6
Union County, New Jersey.
Apr 9, 2013
#5
  • Apr 9, 2013
  • #5
Ok just tried the 88300 and the front tube from the #5 cyl is right where the cable goes into the bell.
Thinking of going with shorties, anyone have that combo with shorties and an H or X pipe? Oh ya I also have a Borgson power steering box! Name brand and part #s would be great

Thanks, John.
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Apr 9, 2013
#6
  • Apr 9, 2013
  • #6
The 351 swap headers are supposed to work though they'll prob hang lower..I have the 88300 headers and they most certainly don't clear without bending the cable which is a no no..I paid to have that#5 tube cut out and relocated

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
 

Smitten65

Member
Jan 7, 2011
57
4
19
FL
Apr 10, 2013
#7
  • Apr 10, 2013
  • #7
Interesting. I know the 88306 fit perfectly for me. I have the 5.0 bell housing, not an adpated 289 bell and the longer SN95 cable not the shorter earlier version. The cable routes around the oil filter. I thought the 88300 was the same design as the 88306 but that is apparently not so.
 

Smitten65

Member
Jan 7, 2011
57
4
19
FL
Apr 10, 2013
#8
  • Apr 10, 2013
  • #8
They sure look the same...

"Hedman 88300 Painted Exhaust Header Tube Size 1 5/8"" Coll 3"" Ford 289-351W"



"Hedman 88306 HTC Exhaust Header Tube Size 1 5/8"" Coll Size 3"" w/o Smog"

 

spfd

Member
Mar 2, 2011
33
0
6
Union County, New Jersey.
Apr 10, 2013
#9
  • Apr 10, 2013
  • #9
They look the same to me.
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Apr 10, 2013
#10
  • Apr 10, 2013
  • #10
Here is a stock 88300 bottom And My modified one on top...this header needs to be modified if u want the cable to go straight in without bending it



Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
 

Attachments

  • headers%20side%20by%20side%20hedman%2088300.webp
    85.5 KB · Views: 254
  • headers%20side%20by%20side%20hedman%2088300.webp
    85.5 KB · Views: 210

Smitten65

Member
Jan 7, 2011
57
4
19
FL
Apr 10, 2013
#11
  • Apr 10, 2013
  • #11
I think I recall seeing your posts on this before. What cable and bell are you using, v8only? The 88306 fits mine like a glove.
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Apr 10, 2013
#12
  • Apr 10, 2013
  • #12
Fox bell with sn95 these headers at number five tube wind up literally right in front of the bell housing where the cable enters..I don't doubt you but I wonder if you could have gotten different headers because I have had more than one friend with the exact same issue as mine

you can see in this picture with the modified Tube it still barely clears. before I had it modified I almost could make it work but I had to zip tie the cable out of the way which provided a bad arc for the cable and a stiff pedal



Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
 

Attachments

  • header%20installed%202.webp
    45.4 KB · Views: 214
  • header%20installed%202.webp
    45.4 KB · Views: 228

Smitten65

Member
Jan 7, 2011
57
4
19
FL
Apr 10, 2013
#13
  • Apr 10, 2013
  • #13
I'll send a photo and re-check my invoice when I get back to CT in May, I know these cars differ somewhat, but this should be exactly the same car to car. You are using the longer cable thean needs to routre around the oil filter, correct? I know that the shorter cable presents melting issues, but the loneger cable is a straight shot into the bell for me. I don't have the 883000, I do have the 88306 which may be slightly different, even tho' the piuctures look VERY similar.
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Apr 10, 2013
#14
  • Apr 10, 2013
  • #14
Yea I have the longer cable...I have heard the 351 swap headers will work with the 5.0 289 302 and b a straight shot..Yea I'd love to see pics

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
 

spfd

Member
Mar 2, 2011
33
0
6
Union County, New Jersey.
Apr 10, 2013
#15
  • Apr 10, 2013
  • #15
Great picture's, I know what I'm doing tomorrow! I just need to locate some 1 5/8 OD tubing and hope my welds look half as good as yours. Nothing a little header rap wont hide. I hope to post pics by the weekend of my soon to be modified Hedman headers.
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Apr 10, 2013
#16
  • Apr 10, 2013
  • #16
He he...mine were welded by my friend who is the fabricator for a major header co...





Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
 

Attachments

  • header%20welded.webp
    89 KB · Views: 224
  • header%20spark%20plug%20heat%20shielding.webp
    115.3 KB · Views: 227
  • header%20welded.webp
    89 KB · Views: 230
  • header%20spark%20plug%20heat%20shielding.webp
    115.3 KB · Views: 225

spfd

Member
Mar 2, 2011
33
0
6
Union County, New Jersey.
Apr 14, 2013
#17
  • Apr 14, 2013
  • #17
I got it mocked up using Hedman tubing part #12054 and will try welding it together tomorrow...wish me luck!
 

Attachments

  • image.webp
    191.2 KB · Views: 343

spfd

Member
Mar 2, 2011
33
0
6
Union County, New Jersey.
Apr 17, 2013
#18
  • Apr 17, 2013
  • #18
 

spfd

Member
Mar 2, 2011
33
0
6
Union County, New Jersey.
Apr 17, 2013
#19
  • Apr 17, 2013
  • #19
How's it look? I even figured out how to send this pic from my cell phone to this post without the help of my 12 year old.
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Apr 17, 2013
#20
  • Apr 17, 2013
  • #20
That looks good!

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Mustang II V6 conversion to V8 HO and T5 problems and solutions
  • greenflash79
  • Jul 6, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
34
Views
2K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jan 29, 2026
greenflash79
T5 5th gear 89 gt
  • mac_55
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
169
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 20, 2026
Mustang5L5
K
351w engine swap
  • Killer351w
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
201
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 21, 2026
Killer351w
K
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
257
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
Electrical need help with a part number
  • alutwon
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
128
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 27, 2026
alutwon
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?