Ryan02Stang
Active Member
EXACTLY!!! If I believed every advertisement that all my parts came with I'd be around 350rwhp!03trubluGT said:
lost low end torque with LT headers
- Thread starter 01mgvert
- Start date
-
Sponsors (?)
03trubluGT
New Member
That's what u call RICER MATH!03trubluGT said:
The catback exhaust is stock. A Hooker o/r x-pipe replaced the stock catted h-pipe (this is the only mid-pipe that Hooker sells). And the Hooker LT headers replaced the stock exhaust manifolds. I'll try to find the post where someone regained torque by adding cats to their o/r x-pipe after installing LT headers.
Monkie
Active Member
03trubluGT said:
All over the Corvette forums they suggest Tri-Y headers if you want more torque.
Ryan02Stang
Active Member
Monkie said:
So let me get this straight...the CORVETTE tech forums say that on the MUSTANG that...
Y headers = more TQ
Longtubes = more HP
That makes no sense at all. Don't post bad tech, don't go to corvette forums for Mustang tech. People are here for help...not bad advice. Stick to talk.
"Jeg's says" "Corvette forum says" - show us dynograph's to prove a point
984.6gt
Founding Member
According to Jegs, my Pullies, X-Pipe, Intake and Mufflers gave my 98GT 60HP, but they can't be wrong, right? Is that where you got your dyno numbers, by adding up what Jegs advertized for power gains.Monkie said:Hmmmm...well I'm looking at Jegs and I see a header that in the information it says "Delivers the torque of a Tri-Y and the horsepower of a big tube header..." I guess Jegs is "WAY off!
scion4LIFE said:
The dyno charts from Hitech Motorsports can be seen on my other posting, "Gained 23 rwhp with LT Headers." The dynos are somewhat confusing. The pre-mod dyno is STD Horsepower vs. Speed (mph), while the post-mod dyno is SAE Horsepower vs. RPM (x1000). Nonetheless, the pre-mod dyno shows that the torque climbs more quickly prior to the installation of the LT headers and o/r x-pipe. It is true that the torque eventually goes higher (an additional 28 ft/lbs), but it appears to take longer to get there. Nonetheless, I was talking about a change in SOTP performance and 0-60 mph times. My car does not seem as quick off the line and my G-Tech shows that I went from 5.3 seconds to 5.7 seconds in 0-60 mph. Once the engine gets over about 3000 rpms, the car is definitely much faster. Why is this so hard to believe? I am simply reporting the phenomenon; you can come up with any interpretation you want. Better yet, help me to find a way to regain my low end torque.
Some people dont really understand that there is no "perfect" exhaust. If you think of the pipes in length and diameter as almost a kinda like a "cam" for your exhaust gasses it a little bit easier to understand. The more high flow you go the more tune the exhaust to work better at higher rpm's (kinda like a cam). The perfect exhaust would change diameter and length for every change of the rpm, but this is not feasable so you have to pick what rpm range you want to tune the exhaust to. The same goes for intake runner length consequently.
Some may gain top end horsepower and loose low end tork and I have seen it. But its really just loosing exhaust gas evacuation efficiency at whatever rpm as the scavenging effect is all about gas speed going out and creating a vacuum behind it and helping to pull in the new fresh air charge. To those who say you cant loose bottom I say try running 5 inch exhaust tubes and see what happens.
Also sometimes you may not loose but the mid and upper rpm's are much stronger than they where and it makes the bottom feel weaker in comparison when it is actually not.
PS this is my first mustang and I dont know much about them but thats why im here. But it is not my first car by any means. Also the disclaimer "anything I say can and may be total bs and cannot be held against me especially in a court of law."
Some may gain top end horsepower and loose low end tork and I have seen it. But its really just loosing exhaust gas evacuation efficiency at whatever rpm as the scavenging effect is all about gas speed going out and creating a vacuum behind it and helping to pull in the new fresh air charge. To those who say you cant loose bottom I say try running 5 inch exhaust tubes and see what happens.
Also sometimes you may not loose but the mid and upper rpm's are much stronger than they where and it makes the bottom feel weaker in comparison when it is actually not.
PS this is my first mustang and I dont know much about them but thats why im here. But it is not my first car by any means. Also the disclaimer "anything I say can and may be total bs and cannot be held against me especially in a court of law."
Monkie
Active Member
Ryan02Stang said:So let me get this straight...the CORVETTE tech forums say that on the MUSTANG that...
Y headers = more TQ
Longtubes = more HP
That makes no sense at all. Don't post bad tech, don't go to corvette forums for Mustang tech. People are here for help...not bad advice. Stick to talk.
"Jeg's says" "Corvette forum says" - show us dynograph's to prove a point
Dude shut the **** up! No one makes Tri-Y headers for the Mustang that I know of and I was stating that the Corvette guys say it gives more torque than anyother header, also Jegs says the same thing. So more than likely it is true.
Ryan02Stang
Active Member
Monkie
Active Member
984.6gt said:
No dumbass, what you are thinking of is when Jegs or w/e says "Up to 5hp gain" and you think "Oh boy, I will see 5rwhp!" then a week later when you get it dynoed you see no gain. What I am talking about is Jegs says "Gives the torque of a Tri-Y header" there is no numbers in there so it is not the same thing. Also as I have stated Corvette guys have installed Tri-Y headers and have gotten alot of torque with that setup. I wish you and that other homo would stop trying to start **** in the TECH AREA.
Monkie
Active Member
Ryan02Stang said:THANK YOU!!!
I think you meant blue = after and red = before though.
Maybe you should learn how to read so you don't have to edit your posts.
Monkie
Active Member
CottonBurnerz said:
He read and thought you meant blue was after and red was before then he read it again so he had to edit his post because he doesn't agree with you.
Ryan02Stang
Active Member
You're dates are on the dyno sheet...blue came AFTER red.CottonBurnerz said:
And "LT = lose tq "AND" HP!" is the DUMBEST thing I've ever heard.
Similar threads
