• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

lost low end torque with LT headers

  • Thread starter Thread starter 01mgvert
  • Start date Start date Jun 21, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jun 22, 2004
#21
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #21
03trubluGT said:
Keep in mind that's what you call "advertising".... Remember people will say what they think you want to hear to sell you something.

Matt
Click to expand...
EXACTLY!!! If I believed every advertisement that all my parts came with I'd be around 350rwhp!
 

03trubluGT

New Member
Nov 19, 2002
1,067
0
0
Mansfield, TX
Jun 22, 2004
#22
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #22
Ryan02Stang said:
EXACTLY!!! If I believed every advertisement that all my parts came with I'd be around 350rwhp!
Click to expand...


That's what u call RICER MATH!

Matt
 
0

01mgvert

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
302
0
0
Jun 22, 2004
#23
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #23
03trubluGT said:
Well, simply put, LTs didn't make you LOSE anything, it sounds like the combination of midpipe/catback/mufflers were to blame.

Matt
Click to expand...

The catback exhaust is stock. A Hooker o/r x-pipe replaced the stock catted h-pipe (this is the only mid-pipe that Hooker sells). And the Hooker LT headers replaced the stock exhaust manifolds. I'll try to find the post where someone regained torque by adding cats to their o/r x-pipe after installing LT headers.
 

Monkie

Active Member
Jan 27, 2002
1,678
0
37
Under the arch
Jun 22, 2004
#24
  • Jun 22, 2004
  • #24
03trubluGT said:
Keep in mind that's what you call "advertising".... Remember people will say what they think you want to hear to sell you something.

Matt
Click to expand...

All over the Corvette forums they suggest Tri-Y headers if you want more torque.
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jun 23, 2004
#25
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #25
Monkie said:
All over the Corvette forums they suggest Tri-Y headers if you want more torque.
Click to expand...

So let me get this straight...the CORVETTE tech forums say that on the MUSTANG that...

Y headers = more TQ
Longtubes = more HP

That makes no sense at all. Don't post bad tech, don't go to corvette forums for Mustang tech. People are here for help...not bad advice. Stick to talk.

"Jeg's says" "Corvette forum says" - show us dynograph's to prove a point
 

984.6gt

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
2,806
0
46
Sugar Land
Jun 23, 2004
#26
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #26
Monkie said:
Hmmmm...well I'm looking at Jegs and I see a header that in the information it says "Delivers the torque of a Tri-Y and the horsepower of a big tube header..." I guess Jegs is "WAY off! " too huh?
Click to expand...
According to Jegs, my Pullies, X-Pipe, Intake and Mufflers gave my 98GT 60HP, but they can't be wrong, right? Is that where you got your dyno numbers, by adding up what Jegs advertized for power gains.
 
S

scion4LIFE

New Member
Jun 2, 2004
49
0
0
Jun 23, 2004
#27
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #27
WHERE Is dyno proof of tq loss??
 

DJsZincGT

Founding Member
Aug 29, 2002
1,141
0
36
WV
Jun 23, 2004
#28
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #28
This thread went to **** quick!
 
0

01mgvert

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
302
0
0
Jun 23, 2004
#29
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #29
scion4LIFE said:
WHERE Is dyno proof of tq loss??
Click to expand...

The dyno charts from Hitech Motorsports can be seen on my other posting, "Gained 23 rwhp with LT Headers." The dynos are somewhat confusing. The pre-mod dyno is STD Horsepower vs. Speed (mph), while the post-mod dyno is SAE Horsepower vs. RPM (x1000). Nonetheless, the pre-mod dyno shows that the torque climbs more quickly prior to the installation of the LT headers and o/r x-pipe. It is true that the torque eventually goes higher (an additional 28 ft/lbs), but it appears to take longer to get there. Nonetheless, I was talking about a change in SOTP performance and 0-60 mph times. My car does not seem as quick off the line and my G-Tech shows that I went from 5.3 seconds to 5.7 seconds in 0-60 mph. Once the engine gets over about 3000 rpms, the car is definitely much faster. Why is this so hard to believe? I am simply reporting the phenomenon; you can come up with any interpretation you want. Better yet, help me to find a way to regain my low end torque.
 
C

CottonBurnerz

Banned
May 10, 2003
1,554
0
0
Drink and Drive = Teh Lose
Jun 23, 2004
#30
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #30
scion4LIFE said:
WHERE Is dyno proof of tq loss??
Click to expand...

look no more... here is it..

blue = before LT
red = after LT



the myth has been proven.. let's move on now shall we?
 
T

tstik

New Member
Jun 22, 2004
8
0
0
Oklahoma City
Jun 23, 2004
#31
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #31
Some people dont really understand that there is no "perfect" exhaust. If you think of the pipes in length and diameter as almost a kinda like a "cam" for your exhaust gasses it a little bit easier to understand. The more high flow you go the more tune the exhaust to work better at higher rpm's (kinda like a cam). The perfect exhaust would change diameter and length for every change of the rpm, but this is not feasable so you have to pick what rpm range you want to tune the exhaust to. The same goes for intake runner length consequently.

Some may gain top end horsepower and loose low end tork and I have seen it. But its really just loosing exhaust gas evacuation efficiency at whatever rpm as the scavenging effect is all about gas speed going out and creating a vacuum behind it and helping to pull in the new fresh air charge. To those who say you cant loose bottom I say try running 5 inch exhaust tubes and see what happens.

Also sometimes you may not loose but the mid and upper rpm's are much stronger than they where and it makes the bottom feel weaker in comparison when it is actually not.

PS this is my first mustang and I dont know much about them but thats why im here. But it is not my first car by any means. Also the disclaimer "anything I say can and may be total bs and cannot be held against me especially in a court of law."
 
T

tstik

New Member
Jun 22, 2004
8
0
0
Oklahoma City
Jun 23, 2004
#32
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #32
Also I have noticed that there are headers out there that use 1 5/8 tube and headers that use 1 3/4 tube and that makes a big difference. So know what you got.
 

Monkie

Active Member
Jan 27, 2002
1,678
0
37
Under the arch
Jun 23, 2004
#33
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #33
Ryan02Stang said:
So let me get this straight...the CORVETTE tech forums say that on the MUSTANG that...

Y headers = more TQ
Longtubes = more HP

That makes no sense at all. Don't post bad tech, don't go to corvette forums for Mustang tech. People are here for help...not bad advice. Stick to talk.

"Jeg's says" "Corvette forum says" - show us dynograph's to prove a point
Click to expand...

Dude shut the **** up! No one makes Tri-Y headers for the Mustang that I know of and I was stating that the Corvette guys say it gives more torque than anyother header, also Jegs says the same thing. So more than likely it is true.
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jun 23, 2004
#34
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #34
CottonBurnerz said:
look no more... here is it..

blue = before LT
red = after LT

the myth has been proven.. let's move on now shall we?
Click to expand...
THANK YOU!!!

I think you meant blue = after and red = before though.
 

Monkie

Active Member
Jan 27, 2002
1,678
0
37
Under the arch
Jun 23, 2004
#35
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #35
984.6gt said:
According to Jegs, my Pullies, X-Pipe, Intake and Mufflers gave my 98GT 60HP, but they can't be wrong, right? Is that where you got your dyno numbers, by adding up what Jegs advertized for power gains.
Click to expand...

No dumbass, what you are thinking of is when Jegs or w/e says "Up to 5hp gain" and you think "Oh boy, I will see 5rwhp!" then a week later when you get it dynoed you see no gain. What I am talking about is Jegs says "Gives the torque of a Tri-Y header" there is no numbers in there so it is not the same thing. Also as I have stated Corvette guys have installed Tri-Y headers and have gotten alot of torque with that setup. I wish you and that other homo would stop trying to start **** in the TECH AREA.
 

Monkie

Active Member
Jan 27, 2002
1,678
0
37
Under the arch
Jun 23, 2004
#36
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #36
Ryan02Stang said:
THANK YOU!!!

I think you meant blue = after and red = before though.
Click to expand...

Maybe you should learn how to read so you don't have to edit your posts.
 
C

CottonBurnerz

Banned
May 10, 2003
1,554
0
0
Drink and Drive = Teh Lose
Jun 23, 2004
#37
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #37
Ryan02Stang said:
THANK YOU!!!

I think you meant blue = after and red = before though.
Click to expand...

no dudelll blue is BEFORE and red is AFTER... NO MORE ARGUEMENT!!

LT = lose TQ "AND" HP!
 

Monkie

Active Member
Jan 27, 2002
1,678
0
37
Under the arch
Jun 23, 2004
#38
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #38
CottonBurnerz said:
no dudelll blue is BEFORE and red is AFTER... NO MORE ARGUEMENT!!

LT = lose TQ "AND" HP!
Click to expand...

He read and thought you meant blue was after and red was before then he read it again so he had to edit his post because he doesn't agree with you.
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jun 23, 2004
#39
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #39
CottonBurnerz said:
no dudelll blue is BEFORE and red is AFTER... NO MORE ARGUEMENT!!

LT = lose TQ "AND" HP!
Click to expand...
You're dates are on the dyno sheet...blue came AFTER red.

And "LT = lose tq "AND" HP!" is the DUMBEST thing I've ever heard.
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Jun 23, 2004
#40
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #40
why do most of these people even argue? buy some supertraps
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Lost low end torque
  • JJ's90fox
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
732
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2025
Methodical
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Intended Headers and Trans, questions about fitment
  • from6to8
  • Aug 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2025
from6to8
V
pushrod 5.0 (MILD/ Torque) turbo build for an old scout II help
  • vz58
  • Apr 21, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
11
Views
2K
Other Auto Tech Jan 21, 2026
Flyboy60
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?