• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

lost low end torque with LT headers

  • Thread starter Thread starter 01mgvert
  • Start date Start date Jun 21, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jun 23, 2004
#41
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #41
Jackie Chan said:
why do most of these people even argue? buy some supertraps
Click to expand...
Because people should not come on here and say longtubes make you lose horsepower and torque. Longtubes are a VERY beneficial mod and stupid threads like these scare people away from doing them.
 
0

01mgvert

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
302
0
0
Jun 23, 2004
#42
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #42
Ryan02Stang said:
Because people should not come on here and say longtubes make you lose horsepower and torque. Longtubes are a VERY beneficial mod and stupid threads like these scare people away from doing them.
Click to expand...

Without a doubt, LT headers are the best performance part that I have purchased for my 4.6. I gained 23 rwhp and 28 ft/lbs of torque. After 3000 rpms, the car pulls like crazy. I plan to have my car dynoed again, and this time I will have them take the same measurements: STD Horsepower vs. Speed (mph).
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jun 23, 2004
#43
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #43
01mgvert said:
Without a doubt, LT headers are the best performance part that I have purchased for my 4.6. I gained 23 rwhp and 28 ft/lbs of torque. After 3000 rpms, the car pulls like crazy. I plan to have my car dynoed again, and this time I will have them take the same measurements: STD Horsepower vs. Speed (mph).
Click to expand...
Nice gains!! Be sure to post up the dynographs after you get it dynoed.
 

Carl

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
613
0
0
Johnson City, TN
Jun 23, 2004
#44
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #44
Keep in mind most of these mods really shine in the upper rpms, so even if you don't lose anything down low, the top end is so much more powerful that it makes the low end seem less powerful when it isn't. It's just that there is so much more up top.
 
C

CottonBurnerz

Banned
May 10, 2003
1,554
0
0
Drink and Drive = Teh Lose
Jun 23, 2004
#45
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #45
Ryan02Stang said:
Because people should not come on here and say longtubes make you lose horsepower and torque. Longtubes are a VERY beneficial mod and stupid threads like these scare people away from doing them.
Click to expand...



 

SonicB

Founding Member
Apr 29, 2002
239
0
0
Jun 23, 2004
#46
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #46
hmmm, i would expect bbk 1 5/8" long tubes to increase torque as part of where the 2.25" h-pipe was is now 1 5/8".

i also would expect an other wise stock 4.6 gt getting a swap from the 2.25" h-pipe to a 2.5" h or x-pipe to lose some low end torque until additional mods raise the hp at the flywheel to over 300hp at least according to flowmaster, dynomax and magnaflow.
 

984.6gt

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
2,806
0
46
Sugar Land
Jun 23, 2004
#47
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #47
Headers increase HP and TQ on 4.6L 2V Mustangs, why Monkie brought up the 5.7L PushRod LS1 god only knows, not to menton why he brought up Tri-Y headers which don't exist on the 4.6L mustang is beyond me as well, it had nothing to do with this thread and the question being asked. But to answer your question, your car will be faster in all aspects with the addition of long tube headers, I suggest getting the type designed so that you do not have to pull them off to get the tranny down, makes clutch changes much easier.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Lost low end torque
  • JJ's90fox
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
732
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2025
Methodical
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Intended Headers and Trans, questions about fitment
  • from6to8
  • Aug 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2025
from6to8
V
pushrod 5.0 (MILD/ Torque) turbo build for an old scout II help
  • vz58
  • Apr 21, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
11
Views
2K
Other Auto Tech Jan 21, 2026
Flyboy60
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?