• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Lowering Springs for a 4 cyl.

  • Thread starter Thread starter StangGrrLy
  • Start date Start date Nov 1, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

StangGrrLy

Miss StangNet 2003
Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
1,330
0
0
Regina, Saskachewan
Nov 1, 2004
#1
  • Nov 1, 2004
  • #1
Hey guys, I know it's been awhile since I've posted. School has been so crazy I haven't had much time to do anything to my car. But now I have some extra cash kickin around, and i decided I'm gonna get some springs.

So here's the deal lol. I need some opinions on which to go with, cuz I'm pretty clueless about them. I am leaning towards the Eibach kit, because I can get them for a pretty decent price, but I would like to know what the other options are. Also, if in the event that a 2.3T or possibly a 5.0 goes in there eventually, should I avoid any of them because they will drop too low?

Pics would be very helpful too!
Thanks guys!
 

JamesBaumann

Member
Nov 26, 2003
624
0
16
Vancouver Island
Nov 1, 2004
#2
  • Nov 1, 2004
  • #2
One of my buddies just put the eibach kit on his stang. It seems to work pretty well. It doesn't sit too too low, but it sits a little lower.
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Nov 1, 2004
#3
  • Nov 1, 2004
  • #3
Well, eibach is the only company that has 2.3-specific springs...any other kit you'd have to cut the fronts to get the car to the right ride height. So you might be ahead to just go ahead and get the Eibach kit.
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Nov 1, 2004
#4
  • Nov 1, 2004
  • #4
Motorsport C springs would work well also...

I'd suggest the sportlines if you go with eibach...
 

89Stang

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
4,178
0
66
Savannah GA
Nov 1, 2004
#5
  • Nov 1, 2004
  • #5
Eibach Sportlines lower the car a bit more but the ride is more compliant.
Eibach Pro Kits lowers the car less but is more focused on handling. I had these on my 89 RS camaro. Very rough ride but man it was a lot of fun to drive with those springs on that car.
 

T3AL

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
215
0
0
Nov 1, 2004
#6
  • Nov 1, 2004
  • #6
What about the trickone suspention kits how are they?
 

Asha'man

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2002
1,909
0
0
Denver
Nov 1, 2004
#7
  • Nov 1, 2004
  • #7
89Stang said:
Eibach Sportlines lower the car a bit more but the ride is more compliant.
Eibach Pro Kits lowers the car less but is more focused on handling. I had these on my 89 RS camaro. Very rough ride but man it was a lot of fun to drive with those springs on that car.
Click to expand...

Switch that. Pro-Kit is less of a lowering effect and decent ride, Sportlines are slammed and ride rough. Stinger will disagree, but I think I'm right.

Ash
 

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
Nov 1, 2004
#8
  • Nov 1, 2004
  • #8
Cool I am thinking of lowering my 93 but dont want to be killed by a speed bump either. So I think that the Pro-kit may be the way that I go.

For the longest time I have raised the rear with air and while it looks good it slides like a waterbed and baby oil.
 

89Stang

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
4,178
0
66
Savannah GA
Nov 2, 2004
#9
  • Nov 2, 2004
  • #9
I rode in a Formula Fbody with sportlines. Rode better than My RS with the pro kit. Both still had stock shocks....

So I will stick with the pro kit handles better but with a rougher ride.
 
N

NY Eric

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
67
0
0
Carmel NY
Nov 2, 2004
#10
  • Nov 2, 2004
  • #10
Motorsport C

I have had cut stock springs and the Eibach pro springs and hated both compared to the C springs. Just my opinion though
 

MrKwik

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,008
0
0
Kansas City, Kansas
Nov 2, 2004
#11
  • Nov 2, 2004
  • #11
89Stang said:
I rode in a Formula Fbody with sportlines. Rode better than My RS with the pro kit. Both still had stock shocks....

So I will stick with the pro kit handles better but with a rougher ride.
Click to expand...
The sportline springs are a higher fixed rate spring. The pro-kit is a progressive lower rate spring. I have seen 5.0 cars with the sportline springs and they are pretty damn low and ride pretty harsh. I have the pro-kit springs on my 90 and the hight is perfect and they ride pretty nice. I would personally would not hesitate to reccomend the pro-kit but the sportlines would probably handle a bit better during aggressive driving if you can deal with the rough ride.
 

StangGrrLy

Miss StangNet 2003
Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
1,330
0
0
Regina, Saskachewan
Nov 2, 2004
#12
  • Nov 2, 2004
  • #12
Awesome, thanks guys! Can anyone post up some pics for comparison?

Also, has anyone had any rubbing problems with any of these kits?
 

MrKwik

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,008
0
0
Kansas City, Kansas
Nov 2, 2004
#13
  • Nov 2, 2004
  • #13
StangGrrLy said:
Awesome, thanks guys! Can anyone post up some pics for comparison?

Also, has anyone had any rubbing problems with any of these kits?
Click to expand...
I dont really have a good side shot of my car that has the pro-kit springs but I will try and shap one when I get home this evening and post it. As far as rubbing issues, I havnt had any and I am running cobra r's with 255/40-17's all around one 17x8 fronts and 17x9 rear. I havnt rolled the lips or flipped the quad shocks either.
 

89Stang

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
4,178
0
66
Savannah GA
Nov 2, 2004
#14
  • Nov 2, 2004
  • #14
Fbody spring lineup might be different. But here is a pic of my camaro with Eibach Pro's

ride was stiffer but handled better than the sportline springs in my buddys fbody.
I dont have a pic of his car but one of the guys in our club has them on his GTA with KYB shocks and struts.
The cars end up sitting about the same height due to his car weighing a fair amount more from stereo and stuff. But it kind of gives you an idea.... Though in the pics it looks like I am lower... but a lot of that has to do with his car sitting on the grass and the fact I have tall profile 15 inch tires on when hehas low pro 17s. Side by side he sits slightly lower.

here is a pic of my Z28 you can see the difference!
 
M

mightypoof

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
523
0
0
Glendale, AZ
Nov 2, 2004
#15
  • Nov 2, 2004
  • #15
I have Maxspeed springs. I love them. I think they are a ricer company, but I got them for cheap on ebay. I had to cut somewhere between 3/4 and 1 1/4 coils off the front, I dont remember exactly. Here is a pic.
 

Attachments

  • stang.webp
    31.4 KB · Views: 279

MrKwik

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,008
0
0
Kansas City, Kansas
Nov 3, 2004
#16
  • Nov 3, 2004
  • #16
I tried to take some pictures yesterday but it was too dark when I got home so they didnt come out. This is the only picture I have taken since I installed the springs. Its a bad pic but you can see how the car sits. I think the picture makes the back look a little bit higher than it really is though. Probably cause the driveway is uneven or something.



 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Nov 3, 2004
#17
  • Nov 3, 2004
  • #17
My car has the eibach pro-kit (black springs) and it's too low and rides like a brick **** house...NEVER will I buy another set of them. I don't care what their site says about them...they are stiffer than the sportlines (just think of the names for a second...doesn't PRO seem like a more serious spring than SPORT?).
 

StangGrrLy

Miss StangNet 2003
Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
1,330
0
0
Regina, Saskachewan
Nov 3, 2004
#18
  • Nov 3, 2004
  • #18
Oh man now I'm getting confused lol. Basically what I'm going for is to go as low as possible without rubbing issues. I can get CC plates if necessary, but I will also have new rims and tires by then (17" with probably 245/45 tires all around). I could care less if it rides rough, lol that just makes it more fun to drive. So I think my mind has changed more towards the Sportlines, as they are a little bigger drop from what I understand?
 
M

mightypoof

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
523
0
0
Glendale, AZ
Nov 3, 2004
#19
  • Nov 3, 2004
  • #19
My rear used to rub on the fenders really bad. I was running 245-60r-14's at the time. I switched to some 225-60r-14's and they still rubbed. I ended up hammering the the fender "lip" (look at it and you will see what I'm talking about) flat against the fender. The rubbing issue is basically solved. If I have a couple people in the backseat and hit a bump pretty good then it still hits. I dont think my rear wheel wells are different since mine is a vert.

-Josh

P.S.-When the photo was taken I had 5/8" spacers in the rear, so it actually sits lower than in the pic. Any lower in the front and I would hit on EVERY speed bump and steep drive, not just big ones like I do now.
 

T3AL

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
215
0
0
Nov 3, 2004
#20
  • Nov 3, 2004
  • #20
I just want a 2 in drop all around....whats a cheaper company than eibach for lowering springs?
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
552
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
458
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
J
Car Diagnosis
  • j.2016
  • Aug 31, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
3
Views
327
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Aug 31, 2025
Noobz347
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
568
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?