• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

LT's or shorty headers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustanggt108
  • Start date Start date Oct 9, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
M

Mustanggt108

New Member
Sep 23, 2005
221
0
0
Oct 9, 2005
#1
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #1
Whats the difference between them ? will i see more gains with LT's ?? and how much more??
I know the instalation of LT's is a major PITA, unlike the shorty headers whith wont recuire any slight engine lift or too much unbolting underneath the car just to instal them like the LT's will .

but my question really is , how much of a gain difference will i see between LT's and shorty's?
 

White Stang

Member
Feb 11, 2004
467
0
16
Ft Lauderdale
Oct 9, 2005
#2
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #2
LT its good for a few more horses and mid lengh headers are just as hard to install.
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Oct 9, 2005
#3
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #3
depending on where you are and who you know, LT's aren't ideal for inspection checks
 

Enter Username

Member
Oct 7, 2003
65
0
6
Oct 9, 2005
#4
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #4
Mustanggt108 said:
Whats the difference between them ? will i see more gains with LT's ?? and how much more??
I know the instalation of LT's is a major PITA, unlike the shorty headers whith wont recuire any slight engine lift or too much unbolting underneath the car just to instal them like the LT's will .

but my question really is , how much of a gain difference will i see between LT's and shorty's?
Click to expand...

From what other people have said:

8-10 from shortys.

20-30 from lts.
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Oct 9, 2005
#5
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #5
i have heard the only shorties that get decent power are the jba's. never knew where this info came from or if it is true. also that i believe is with a power adder.

long tubes will still make more. they are a pain in the a$$ not only to install but to changs tranny or clutch.
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
Oct 9, 2005
#6
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #6
i have LT. happy with it...


Until i had to pull tranny our...


Twice in 1.5 week....


I have no idea how am i gonna get her to pass inspection this comming year....

Shoty has has some good. just non are power related. Shorty is inspection friendly, little(not buy much) easier to install, and you'll love them if you ever need to pull transmission out ..
 
V

vld

New Member
Nov 5, 2004
132
0
0
Oct 9, 2005
#7
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #7
20 to 30 hp from long tubes? is that right? if i remember correctly in the 5.0 i used to drive wisdom was shorties for low end and Lt's for top end. but i am discovering that the 4.6 is a whole new beast.
 

jasonh_86

I
May 20, 2005
1,156
2
48
Arkansas
Oct 9, 2005
#8
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #8
+1 for long tubes
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 9, 2005
#9
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #9
Why not split the difference between the two and get yourself a set of mid-length headers like I did.

All the benefits of a long tube and still plenty of room to access the transmission if need be.
 
W

WOT

Founding Member
Nov 26, 2000
2,817
0
46
Regina, Canada
Oct 9, 2005
#10
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #10
If you are staying NA go LT's.

Forced induction deosn't matter. Maybe 10 HP between the two.
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Oct 9, 2005
#11
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #11
if where you live has strict emissions laws like here in california then shorties would be a good choice to stay legal but LT are the best choice due to the power increase they give
 

streetstang03

unModerator
Dec 27, 2003
0
1
0
the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,
Oct 9, 2005
#12
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #12
LTs and then bribe the inspector!
 
F

Fubar02GT

New Member
Jul 30, 2005
73
0
0
Bradford
Oct 9, 2005
#13
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #13
streetstang03 said:
LTs and then bribe the inspector!
Click to expand...

 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Oct 9, 2005
#14
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #14
its getting harder to do bribing the inspectors
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Oct 9, 2005
#15
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #15
Midlenghts are not the same as LTs. The LTs gain power due to keeping the exhaust gasses seperate longer and preventing any turblence between each cylinders exhaust gasses for as long as possable. So thats the basic reason why LTs make the most power. Shortys really wont do much because their runners are a tad longer than stock and allow the exhaust gasses to stay seperate a little longer..equal length shortys are better than regular shortys as they help keep the exhaust gass pulses from interfering (sp) with eachother when the exhaust merges....again, even they dont match the HP of LTs. SO go LTs.
 
M

Mustanggt108

New Member
Sep 23, 2005
221
0
0
Oct 9, 2005
#16
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #16
streetstang03 said:
LTs and then bribe the inspector!
Click to expand...

loooooooooool man u seriously read my mind.I think thats exactly what i'm going to do.See you can do that here STILL . bribe the inspectors that is
but can anyone seriously tell me how much HP i will see with LT's
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Oct 9, 2005
#17
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #17
One guy here installed LTs and UD pully and got 16RWHP. BTW he already had a catted midpipe...then added LTs with a new catted midpipe....so the gains were ONLY from LTs and pullys and not from a midpipe too.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 9, 2005
#18
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #18
hotmustang331 said:
Midlenghts are not the same as LTs. The LTs gain power due to keeping the exhaust gasses seperate longer and preventing any turblence between each cylinders exhaust gasses for as long as possable. So thats the basic reason why LTs make the most power. Shortys really wont do much because their runners are a tad longer than stock and allow the exhaust gasses to stay seperate a little longer..equal length shortys are better than regular shortys as they help keep the exhaust gass pulses from interfering (sp) with eachother when the exhaust merges....again, even they dont match the HP of LTs. SO go LTs.
Click to expand...
Actually, I remember reading an old Super Ford exhaust issue a while while back that showed testing that documented as long as the header had at least 27" primary tubes, going any longer with them before they merged didn't make an difference for scavenging purposes.

Most mid-length headers still cover this length and that's why they're now starting to gain so much popularity. The reason that a lot of the companies still go with the full length header design is because it's easier to complete the rest of the exhaust system after it's cleared the engine bay and is running horizontal along the bottom of the car and it's not costing any power in doing so. A lot of mid-length designs still leave the collector up near the bottom of the firewall beyond the access of the engine bay and make it a real bear to route the rest of the exhaust. It's a b**ch to get to it from the to and a b**ch to get to it from the bottom.
 
R

Robuilt

Founding Member
Sep 7, 2001
306
0
16
McAllen, TX
Oct 9, 2005
#19
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #19
how about torque numbers? any difference there
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 9, 2005
#20
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #20
That I know of, between the mid-length and full length, there are none. Between the shorties and the mid/full length, the shorties tend to fall slightly short and are also moved a couple notches higher in the power band.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
LT headers/ CEL misfire
  • Starxk
  • Jul 28, 2025
  • 2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
6
Views
285
2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk Jul 28, 2025
Noobz347
R
bbk shorty header to mid pipe gasket
  • randyyy
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
316
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 29, 2025
randyyy
R
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Engine (EGR Deleted) Solution the hotter combustion chambers?
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
97
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 2, 2026
PonyGTrider
R
94’ SN95 - Intermittent lope & bogging at moderate rpm
  • Red5.0ho
  • Nov 2, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
388
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 3, 2025
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?