It's unfortunate that the supposed "good" version of the 87-93 Mustang -- the GT -- actually got the bad/fugly pieces. The "aero" skirt GT lower body pieces? Fugly. No actual aerodynamic purpose at all, and make the car look bottom heavy. Any idiot can glue on some Xenon brand plastic bits like them, but the truth is that the stock LX looks cleaner and lighter. Sorry but true. (Also, don't the GT aero skirt pieces also weigh 50 or 100 lbs. more?) LX stainless tailpipes? Way cool. The GT front end? Let's see -- no grille/no air flow to radiator. Dumb. Louvered GT tail lights? Need I say anything? The shortage of LX tailights in the junkyards answers that question. Fog lights? Just annoy everyone coming towards you and by the way, when you see your way through all that fog how much are those replacement bulbs/lenses? The truth is that the LX looks leaner and therefore meaner. Oh and here's the kicker: If the LX version was even partly intended to fool the insurance companies into cheaper rates because it was not a GT, it worked. I have had two 5.0's listed on my policy for many years now, and get the lowest rate offered (even lower than my two Corvettes) since they are both listed as 1990 Ford Mustang LX's. Hahahahahahahahahahah...................