• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Massachusetts Inspection Tough on Noise Levels

  • Thread starter Thread starter 93gtmustang
  • Start date Start date Apr 7, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last

skunk21

Active Member
May 22, 2007
1,203
3
36
Taxachusetts
Aug 29, 2008
#61
  • Aug 29, 2008
  • #61
I was just at the inspection station getting my contour done it's the same garage that does all my cars and did teh mustang as well. He was telling me that he just got back from the meeting last week with the state they had for inspectors. They will only be doing safety inspections on OBD 1 cars 1995 and older no more emission testing no dyno & no tail pipe , although they can still do a check for cats and smog what that has to do with safety, but like he said doubt anyone will take the time becuase if the car passes safety no one was clear on if they could fail for no cats LOL freaken state.

next drop in that carbed 347 stroker or a loppy cam and a set of heads boys no more sniffers .
 

monte87

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
876
18
49
56
new york
www.youtube.com
Aug 29, 2008
#62
  • Aug 29, 2008
  • #62
Its all about the benjamins!!!!!!!!! They could give a crap about the noise level, pollution or whatever, Its about raising $$$ for the state Govt.... It seems MA is getting to ba like the Nazi state of Cali with all there laws, rules and reg's about smog, blah, blah....
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Aug 29, 2008
#63
  • Aug 29, 2008
  • #63
I just had my car inspected. It's pretty loud but they didn't care. If anything the mechanics were all asking me questions about the car....how fast i've gone, how many HP, where did i get the wheels (OEM bullitt wheels)


I heard about the no emmissions testing for OBD1 and older cars. It's because the state ended it's contract with the manufacturer of the dynos so they are doing away with it. DOn't hold your breath that this is how it will stay. The state is looking into setting up dyno facilities at specified locations...so if your OBD-II car fails or you have an preOBDII car you'll have to go to one of these facilities instead.

Just for the meantine...dyno testing is done
 

Ozz

I think I have a problem here.
Founding Member
Jul 27, 2001
3,514
66
109
44
Canton, MI
www.soniccherry.com
Aug 29, 2008
#64
  • Aug 29, 2008
  • #64
monte87 said:
Its all about the benjamins!!!!!!!!! They could give a crap about the noise level, pollution or whatever, Its about raising $$$ for the state Govt.... It seems MA is getting to ba like the Nazi state of Cali with all there laws, rules and reg's about smog, blah, blah....
Click to expand...

"getting to be" Years gone by, dude. You should see the safety laws too. If you're out of windshielf washer fluid, you'll FAIL because you can't prove your squirters are operable. No front plate = fail too. I even failed recently w/my G35 because the clear, plastic cover to one tail light bulb was missing. The bulb still lit up and the plate was perfectly visible at night, but that doesn't matter.
 

skunk21

Active Member
May 22, 2007
1,203
3
36
Taxachusetts
Aug 29, 2008
#65
  • Aug 29, 2008
  • #65
Mustang5L5 said:
I just had my car inspected. It's pretty loud but they didn't care. If anything the mechanics were all asking me questions about the car....how fast i've gone, how many HP, where did i get the wheels (OEM bullitt wheels)


I heard about the no emmissions testing for OBD1 and older cars. It's because the state ended it's contract with the manufacturer of the dynos so they are doing away with it. DOn't hold your breath that this is how it will stay. The state is looking into setting up dyno facilities at specified locations...so if your OBD-II car fails or you have an preOBDII car you'll have to go to one of these facilities instead.

Just for the meantine...dyno testing is done
Click to expand...

ahh man I had my hopes up, raining on my parade .
 

Hissing Cobra

Founding Member
Jan 4, 2002
798
0
17
Massachusetts
Aug 30, 2008
#66
  • Aug 30, 2008
  • #66
I'm glad you found an inspection station that was able to pass it.

It's too bad about the "authority figures" in our state government that waste their time with this sh**t. Maybe they should concentrate on more important matters and pass laws that the "people" want?

My car is LOUD for a street car. It has Mac 1-3/4" longtube headers, Mac off-road 2.5" H-Pipe and a Mac 2.5" catback system. Like I said, it's loud! However, I get comments all the time on how good it sounds. I not only like it myself, I love it!

Last year, I drove to the inspection station and I straight out asked the guy, "Is this going to pass or not? I don't want to waste your time or mine." He replied, "Pull it in and don't bring it up past idle. I don't want to hear it." Ten minutes later I was on my way - with my new inspection sticker. I went back this past June and he told me to pull it in before I even got out of it. Again, I got my sticker.

I think it's totally B.S. that the state governement can pass a law or put pressure on the cops to crack down, yet they can't come up with parameters for the law to be met. Only in Massachusetts.........
 

Coast2CoaStang

Member
Aug 11, 2008
254
4
19
Aug 30, 2008
#67
  • Aug 30, 2008
  • #67
As a MA. native I know people who have failed safety for having visible rust on the body of the vehicle. Gotta love the salt back east. My CA. 91 LX is cleaner than my 01 GT from MA.
 

monte87

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
876
18
49
56
new york
www.youtube.com
Sep 9, 2008
#68
  • Sep 9, 2008
  • #68
Wow, and i thought New York was bad, aftre reading this thread, i guess not regarding inspection, everything sucks ass. except conveinence..... I know NJ is a ballbreaker with inspection...

mansonozz said:
"getting to be" Years gone by, dude. You should see the safety laws too. If you're out of windshielf washer fluid, you'll FAIL because you can't prove your squirters are operable. No front plate = fail too. I even failed recently w/my G35 because the clear, plastic cover to one tail light bulb was missing. The bulb still lit up and the plate was perfectly visible at night, but that doesn't matter.
Click to expand...
 

TwoToneHatch

Active Member
Mar 22, 2007
170
2
28
New Jersey
Sep 9, 2008
#69
  • Sep 9, 2008
  • #69
mansonozz said:
"getting to be" Years gone by, dude. You should see the safety laws too. If you're out of windshielf washer fluid, you'll FAIL because you can't prove your squirters are operable. No front plate = fail too. I even failed recently w/my G35 because the clear, plastic cover to one tail light bulb was missing. The bulb still lit up and the plate was perfectly visible at night, but that doesn't matter.
Click to expand...


The "Safety Laws" are ridiculous ! My dad's '04 GT passed all the tests but it got failed because he had a small "Mustang club of America" in the very bottom corner of the windshield on the passenger side where it is completely out of eye-sight and hard to see from the inside but it's still a "Safety Hazard"
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
54
Indiana
Sep 9, 2008
#70
  • Sep 9, 2008
  • #70
Im glad I live in Indiana. We do not have inspections of any kind.
 

skunk21

Active Member
May 22, 2007
1,203
3
36
Taxachusetts
Sep 9, 2008
#71
  • Sep 9, 2008
  • #71
5.0Droptop said:
Im glad I live in Indiana. We do not have inspections of any kind.
Click to expand...

:Zip2:










 

Notchbck93

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
422
1
0
IL
Sep 10, 2008
#72
  • Sep 10, 2008
  • #72
IL is looking better and better.


You have to remember that 99% of those workers are disgruntled and underpaid nerds that got picked on in high school.

Back in 99 I had to take my 91 GT in for emissions and this guy comes over and sits on my front fender. I went you know what on the guy and he almost fell over.

No one has the right to come sit on my Mustang. The guy got out the paper floor mats, plastic seat and steering wheel covers.

Sounds like Mass is ready for another tea party.
 

Coast2CoaStang

Member
Aug 11, 2008
254
4
19
Sep 10, 2008
#73
  • Sep 10, 2008
  • #73
Notchbck93 said:
Sounds like Mass is ready for another tea party.
Click to expand...


At this point the whole country needs a tea party. Hopefully the next president won't be like the last
 

monte87

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
876
18
49
56
new york
www.youtube.com
Sep 11, 2008
#74
  • Sep 11, 2008
  • #74
I do agree and understand that states need to do vehicle inspection for safety, such as brakes, fuel, hoses and improtant stuff. So that your vehicle doesnt cause a safety hazard to other drives and such. But not for the minor petty bull****, like a small sticker on the front windsheild-Its insane!!!
Plus-Inspection should be completely FREE with no fines. Then you would see how fast many, cars would pass because there is no penalty or fine to pay the govt. Another words inspections would truly help the public and people not penalize them. Our Govt has it backwards, One huge messsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss!!!!!!!!
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Sep 11, 2008
#75
  • Sep 11, 2008
  • #75
I love when i see the state troopers on the side of the road pulling people over for inspection stickers. They do it all the time.


I can see pulling over some rust-box clunker with electrical probs bellowing smolke out, but lets be honest here. The majority of cars on the road are pretty new. Once in a while they might have a bulb out here and there, but there is no reason to be pulling people over in 1-2 year old cars and handing out tickets because they are 6 days late getting an inspection.

But i do agree inspections should take place. Most of us here take care of out cars. We are on top of things and never let mechanical probs go too long.

But some people drive until their brakes look like this and I DON't Want this person behind me



Or what about the person driving on tires like this? Do you want them behind you?
 

monte87

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
876
18
49
56
new york
www.youtube.com
Sep 12, 2008
#76
  • Sep 12, 2008
  • #76
Totally agree hahahahah Great pic's. nothing better than a pic for an example. It reminds me of that insurance commercial, with the chick putting make up on while driving to work, These people are out there. Very sad, But true.
 

93gtmustang

10 Year Member
Oct 21, 2006
524
43
49
Oct 14, 2008
#77
  • Oct 14, 2008
  • #77
I wonder if they are going to do a visual inspection for cats.
I looking into a new exhaust system and would hate to fail if I got a off road H or X pipe, and then have to buy one with cats to pass.
That would be about $600.00 in H or X pipes!
 

Beasty306GT

Active Member
Dec 19, 2002
671
4
28
44
Oxford,Mass
Oct 14, 2008
#78
  • Oct 14, 2008
  • #78
There's still gonna be a visual check for cats...If you dont have them ur gettin a big time fine
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Oct 14, 2008
#79
  • Oct 14, 2008
  • #79
You need cats period. There will never be a day where it's legal to remove pollution control equipment from a vehicle so equipped. Even if your state doesn't do the sniffer...you need cats period
 

StadEMS3

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 19, 2003
228
43
49
Mechanicsville, MD
Oct 14, 2008
#80
  • Oct 14, 2008
  • #80
I'm from the Cape but statoned in Maryland. I've brought my stang home once and kinda got dirty looks from the cops. I harldy ever see any muscle type cars on the Cape, my mom said if they are out the cops are always busting thier asses for exhaust noises. Then again it is the Cape, nothing but spoiled rotten kids kids in Lexus's, BMWs and what not
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
J
For Sale [FOR SALE] 1991 Mustang Notchback / 90,000 Miles / ~15,000 mile motor / Lots of Upgrades
  • Johnnie_Casino
  • Apr 2, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 2, 2025
Johnnie_Casino
J
1
For Sale 1995 Mustang GT Convertible FOR SALE
  • #16Stang
  • Jun 21, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
995
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jun 21, 2024
#16Stang
1
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
649
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?