• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

methonol or intercooler??? can you guys explain?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ADRENLN
  • Start date Start date Jun 21, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Jun 21, 2006
#1
  • Jun 21, 2006
  • #1
guys today i was talking to my tuner about my future boosted application. which will consist of:

built block
novi 2000 around 14psi
p-51 intake.
and all the mods i have now...heads, cams, l/t...

this setup should make hopefully around 500 rwhp we both agree on that.

so he says that i wont need the intercooler, that i should just get the SNOW methonol kit or somthing. he said he hardly uses intercoolers on his cars and with my mods i will make around the 500 mark with the methonol. he said he dont like intercoolers.

so i always wanted to get ythe intercooled set up and never thought of anything else.

how does the methonol work? is it harmful to the car in any way? which is better and what is the difference?

thanks guys.
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Jun 21, 2006
#2
  • Jun 21, 2006
  • #2
ADRENLN said:
guys today i was talking to my tuner about my future boosted application. which will consist of:

built block
novi 2000 around 14psi
p-51 intake.
and all the mods i have now...heads, cams, l/t...

this setup should make hopefully around 500 rwhp we both agree on that.

so he says that i wont need the intercooler, that i should just get the SNOW methonol kit or somthing. he said he hardly uses intercoolers on his cars and with my mods i will make around the 500 mark with the methonol. he said he dont like intercoolers.

so i always wanted to get ythe intercooled set up and never thought of anything else.

how does the methonol work? is it harmful to the car in any way? which is better and what is the difference?

thanks guys.
Click to expand...

It isn't harmful unless it sticks open and hydrolocks your engine. You need to keep the tank filled, and you need to seperate tune to run it vs. not running. Those are the downfalls. The upside is that it is much cheaper than the intercooler setup.
 

DTNODYA

Member
Dec 15, 2005
831
1
16
Jun 21, 2006
#3
  • Jun 21, 2006
  • #3
jstreet0204 said:
It isn't harmful unless it sticks open and hydrolocks your engine. You need to keep the tank filled, and you need to seperate tune to run it vs. not running. Those are the downfalls. The upside is that it is much cheaper than the intercooler setup.
Click to expand...

Why do you have to keep the tank filled? I don't know about methanol either...
 

DBMSTNG

I fantasize about it being BIG!
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
2,120
0
56
not quite here
Jun 21, 2006
#4
  • Jun 21, 2006
  • #4
DTNODYA said:
Why do you have to keep the tank filled? I don't know about methanol either...
Click to expand...


you get more power with a boost cooler because it cools the air, which allows you to run more timing. you need the constant flow of methonal/water to keep the aircharge cool while racing. if the tank goes empty, you aren't cooling the air anymore. the aircharge temp will increase and your engine will start knocking because it's running too much timing for the air temp.

an intercooler is the best and safest way to go. it's always there working. unfortunatley, it's more expensive.
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Jun 21, 2006
#5
  • Jun 21, 2006
  • #5
You always have to be filling the methanol resevior. Go with the conventional technology, an intercooler.
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Jun 21, 2006
#6
  • Jun 21, 2006
  • #6
well with some injection kits you can use windshield washer fluid, which is cheap. and you can always use a larger tank then the ones supplied in the kits.


i think it depends on what your looking for, a setup that is pretty much only good during races or spend more and have it 100% of the time
 

PULMEOVR

I need a bigger E-Penis.
Sep 29, 2003
560
0
27
Ottawa, Ontario Canada
Jun 21, 2006
#7
  • Jun 21, 2006
  • #7
There is an excellent write-up and explanation of methanol injection, Snow Performance etc. in the latest issue of 'Modified Mustangs' magazine. Lots of pics as well. Hope that helps!

Matt
 

damacman

Member
Aug 12, 2003
529
0
16
Phoenix, AZ
Jun 21, 2006
#8
  • Jun 21, 2006
  • #8
14 pounds of boost, huh? Let us know how that works out . . . should make some sick power.
 

DTNODYA

Member
Dec 15, 2005
831
1
16
Jun 21, 2006
#9
  • Jun 21, 2006
  • #9
I would use an intercooler then. Seems like methanol would be a hassle.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Jun 21, 2006
#10
  • Jun 21, 2006
  • #10
urban96 said:
well with some injection kits you can use windshield washer fluid, which is cheap. and you can always use a larger tank then the ones supplied in the kits.


i think it depends on what your looking for, a setup that is pretty much only good during races or spend more and have it 100% of the time
Click to expand...
I agree...depends on what your looking for. I may install a Snow kit for when i am at the track and running a 12psi pulley. I would have a dedicated tune also. And they make bigger tanks, i've seen them up to 7 gallons. Most of the guys i spoke to who run it on the street go through 1/2 gallon of washer fluid per gas tank fill up. Thats not too bad at all.
 
P

Pennywise2

Banned
May 16, 2006
1,379
1
0
Jun 21, 2006
#11
  • Jun 21, 2006
  • #11
In that case you mite as well get the Paxton intercooler
for your Novi 2K.
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Jun 22, 2006
#12
  • Jun 22, 2006
  • #12
thanks for your guys insight and opinions. i dont know why exactly he dont like intercoolers. i will have to ask him again. i really felt like that was the was i wanted to go because it seems like the methonol is just a short cut. then he sprung that on me today and it made me think.

the intercooler is alot more expensive but i want whats best for the car. the methonol seems like too much trouble for me...i rather shell out the extra cash.

i think my tuner dont like the intercoolers because he is not big on timeing.
he keeps it low on everyones cars because it is more safe. he still gets good power out of the cars without it. isnt the intercooler just so you can run the timing way up and get more power?

i still dont know why he would favor that over the intercooler. also maybe because i dont drive the car everyday. i dont know.

i think i still like the intercooler. paxton air to air.. also what is the difference between paxton air to air and the other intercoolers?

thanks guys.
 
P

Pennywise2

Banned
May 16, 2006
1,379
1
0
Jun 22, 2006
#13
  • Jun 22, 2006
  • #13
ADRENLN said:
thanks for your guys insight and opinions. i dont know why exactly he dont like intercoolers. i will have to ask him again. i really felt like that was the was i wanted to go because it seems like the methonol is just a short cut. then he sprung that on me today and it made me think.

the intercooler is alot more expensive but i want whats best for the car. the methonol seems like too much trouble for me...i rather shell out the extra cash.

i think my tuner dont like the intercoolers because he is not big on timeing.
he keeps it low on everyones cars because it is more safe. he still gets good power out of the cars without it. isnt the intercooler just so you can run the timing way up and get more power?

i still dont know why he would favor that over the intercooler. also maybe because i dont drive the car everyday. i dont know.

i think i still like the intercooler. paxton air to air.. also what is the difference between paxton air to air and the other intercoolers?

thanks guys.
Click to expand...
The Paxton air to air intercooler will fit the best with your Novi 2K
compaired to the other.If you do get a Novi 2K make sure you get
the matching Paxton intercooler to go with it.I personaly don't like
the methonol injection and would rather have a intercooler.Pushing
that much boost you will need a intercooler and a built block or you
will be running on barrowed time.
 

jivepepper

Founding Member
Jun 19, 2002
776
5
18
Under a Sombrero. in WV.
Jun 22, 2006
#14
  • Jun 22, 2006
  • #14
You can make more power with the injection on the same size pulley because it has no restriction.
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Jun 22, 2006
#15
  • Jun 22, 2006
  • #15
sounds like the intercooler is the better option, except for loosing boost throught the intercooler. then i have to turn the blower harder to get the same power and boost....that is what you are saying right?

well i guess thats why i am going with the 2000 anyway. i will be loosing boost through the heads and cams and now the inter cooler.....i am going to have to run a tiny pully just to see 14psi.
 

SamMan

New Member
Aug 20, 2005
121
0
0
Denton, TX
Jun 22, 2006
#16
  • Jun 22, 2006
  • #16
Seems like from what I read you can run more timing with methanol even if you have an intercooler. Would that make methanol more effective when it is on?

Either way it seems like methanol would be more effective.

However as already stated you dont have it on all the time.
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Jun 23, 2006
#17
  • Jun 23, 2006
  • #17
anyone else have an opinion or ideas? what are all you blower guys useing?
 

damacman

Member
Aug 12, 2003
529
0
16
Phoenix, AZ
Jun 23, 2006
#18
  • Jun 23, 2006
  • #18
Personally, I don't think a single person in this thread has given you a good (accurate) reason for not using water / methanol injection. Properly installed and calibrated, these kits work excellent and are much better bang for the buck than an intercooler.

The Snow stage II kit I use on my car works flawlessly. If your tuner prefers water / meth over intercoolers, I can only guess he feels more comfortable with the security that offers over an intercooler in his tune. My tuner also preferred water / meth over an intercooler and was glad that I had the kit.
 

jivepepper

Founding Member
Jun 19, 2002
776
5
18
Under a Sombrero. in WV.
Jun 23, 2006
#19
  • Jun 23, 2006
  • #19
damacman said:
Personally, I don't think a single person in this thread has given you a good (accurate) reason for not using water / methanol injection. Properly installed and calibrated, these kits work excellent and are much better bang for the buck than an intercooler.

The Snow stage II kit I use on my car works flawlessly. If your tuner prefers water / meth over intercoolers, I can only guess he feels more comfortable with the security that offers over an intercooler in his tune. My tuner also preferred water / meth over an intercooler and was glad that I had the kit.
Click to expand...


Nothing to fail on on a fmic and nothing to fill. I hope yours continues to work flawlessly. I know my intercooler will. Because for the poor people that have had a water alchy fail it's resulted in blown engines.
 
R

RoadconeTuning

New Member
Apr 4, 2006
458
0
0
Upstate, SC
Jun 23, 2006
#20
  • Jun 23, 2006
  • #20
run both of them... methanol just injects a water/methanol mix into your intake and acts like a chemicle intercooler... if you run both then you can run some INSANE amounts of boost and timing
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
514
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
618
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
279
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?