MM Road and track lowering springs not lowering?

Hey everyone, I'm doing a crap ton of suspension work and an engine swap to my 82 4cyl so the car isn't street worthy right now, but I just put in my rear maximum motorsports road and track lowering springs with J&M height adjustable lower control arms and it definitely doesn't look like it really dropped the car the amount it should have which is .75"-1.25" on the rear...I just mocked up the wheel with the rotor to see how it looked, so no caliper or anything.

Now, this weekend I installed a newly built 8.8 rear diff, J&M adjustable upper (adjusted to stock length) and J&M Weight Jacker lower control arms and the MM road and track lowering springs. The wheel/tire combo is SVE r350 18X9 and nitto nt555 g2 265/35/r18 in one pic, and the stock setup in the other pic. The differential is jacked up with a floor jack so the weight of the car should be on the springs and nothing is torqued yet, and the pig tail on the springs are at 9 o'clock per install instructions. The upper and lower control arms SEEMED to articulate just fine when I was jacking the differential up and down, however I did have a pretty hard time getting the lower passenger side into the differential and was running low on grease, but it was still lightly coated. The weight jacker control arms are also supposed to give additional height adjustment from 1" drop to 2" lift but they are bottomed out...

If anyone could give me some ideas as to what might be going on I would be very appreciative! Thanks

 

Attachments

  • IMG_20160422_135928.jpg
    IMG_20160422_135928.jpg
    924.5 KB · Views: 123
  • 240409995_173210134897780_2154646238446148211_n.jpg
    240409995_173210134897780_2154646238446148211_n.jpg
    518.5 KB · Views: 111
  • Sponsors (?)


Hey everyone, I'm doing a crap ton of suspension work and an engine swap to my 82 4cyl so the car isn't street worthy right now, but I just put in my rear maximum motorsports road and track lowering springs with J&M height adjustable lower control arms and it definitely doesn't look like it really dropped the car the amount it should have which is .75"-1.25" on the rear...I just mocked up the wheel with the rotor to see how it looked, so no caliper or anything.

Now, this weekend I installed a newly built 8.8 rear diff, J&M adjustable upper (adjusted to stock length) and J&M Weight Jacker lower control arms and the MM road and track lowering springs. The wheel/tire combo is SVE r350 18X9 and nitto nt555 g2 265/35/r18 in one pic, and the stock setup in the other pic. The differential is jacked up with a floor jack so the weight of the car should be on the springs and nothing is torqued yet, and the pig tail on the springs are at 9 o'clock per install instructions. The upper and lower control arms SEEMED to articulate just fine when I was jacking the differential up and down, however I did have a pretty hard time getting the lower passenger side into the differential and was running low on grease, but it was still lightly coated. The weight jacker control arms are also supposed to give additional height adjustment from 1" drop to 2" lift but they are bottomed out...

If anyone could give me some ideas as to what might be going on I would be very appreciative! Thanks

Can't figure out where to edit, but I meant to say the spring pig tails were at 6 o'clock per MM install instructions, NOT 9
 
The jack stands don't appear to be free under the car. That would mean all the weight is not on the rear and the springs. If the interior is out or back seat and spare removed it'll make a slight difference.
 
Can you get a pick from this angle...

IMG_0599.JPG

My set up at the time was reinforced stock arms with rear mount relocated down 1.75" and stock rear springs. Here was the car's stance with no interior, gas tank or side glass (doors had glass and hatch with no glass).

IMG_0603.JPG
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Kruisr, how's this? I got several pics of similar and different angles. What are you looking for in the pics?
 

Attachments

  • 240016011_2634694843507127_7082711090134838142_n.jpg
    240016011_2634694843507127_7082711090134838142_n.jpg
    535.1 KB · Views: 87
  • 239263069_1185696441938227_3733892332546044685_n.jpg
    239263069_1185696441938227_3733892332546044685_n.jpg
    384.4 KB · Views: 85
  • 238043616_1059698654770288_8888438514216700680_n.jpg
    238043616_1059698654770288_8888438514216700680_n.jpg
    482.2 KB · Views: 84
  • 240545521_922754361667743_4208788072375461423_n.jpg
    240545521_922754361667743_4208788072375461423_n.jpg
    534.9 KB · Views: 79
  • 240471652_563605908021856_2584856760923546336_n.jpg
    240471652_563605908021856_2584856760923546336_n.jpg
    435.3 KB · Views: 83
Thanks for the pics. The main reason is it helps to identify if something seems off, which to me it doesn't.

Have you tried undoing one of the upper control arms to see if you are experiencing any suspension bind?

The line through the lower control arm mounts relative to the bottom of the spring looks like you have the base of the spring lower than stock, which should be helping you. Makes me think suspension bind. What rear upper bushings are you using (on the axle housing)?
 
Thanks for the response, I'll have to check the control arms for binding this weekend when I can tear everything apart again lol. But I was thinking that because the upper control arms were flattening out and seeming to move along with the the jack that it wouldn't be binding. Would they still move? or would they MOVE, just with requiring more force? And what would confuse me more is that none of the bolts are torqued haha. Also, The axle housing has just stock replacement rubber bushings
 
The reason I asked about bushings is because when I installed poly upper bushings in my axle I had to adjust the metal sleeve in the housing so the upper arm didn't need side loading to get installed. Poly bushings are usually flanged on one side, so sleeve needed to move the thickness of the flange.

When you disconnect one upper arm, it should stay in line with where you just pulled it off. If it shifts to one side or another you will have some amount of bind.

Usually bind is just more force to move the required distance and if that's what you have the lighter weight you have would get the results you are seeing. It is definitely a possibility.
 
I see adjustable lower control arms there, just like I have with the bottom spring perch that you can adjust the height on by turning the bottom threaded portion in and out correct? I see it threaded nearly all the way OUT. It needs to be turned IN so the bottom spring perch goes up. I have my threaded portion nearly flush with the bottom on mine.
 
One check to do would be to remove the rear springs and cycle the suspension with your jack through it's full range of travel observing smooth operation with no binding.

Side note: If those are SN95 rear shocks,as instructed by MM be sure to remove the factory rubber bump stops located on the frame rail above the axle,the SN95 shocks are equipped with internal bump stops.
 
Last edited:
You are not going to get a true vision of the height until it is on the ground. All 4 tires on the ground. Jacking, on jack stands or whatever is just not the same as sitting on the tires. Put the car on the ground. Adjust the rear control arms either screw them in, or out (it can easily be done with the car on the ground) and see what is what.
 
I put it on the ground and nothing changed, the only thing i noticed was that one side was actually higher than the other, so that led me to believe there was some binding. So I took the diff completely out and noticed that the upper left control arm was super tight and it didn't line up with the bushings on the axle housing. I took them out, re did the 3 piece bushings on both sides of the UCA's since it looked like I put them in slightly crooked, and re-measured/adjusted the adjustable upper control arms to correct length. Put it all back together and now I have a decent drop!
 

Attachments

  • 240633086_255932919725302_2517238919559496986_n.jpg
    240633086_255932919725302_2517238919559496986_n.jpg
    550.5 KB · Views: 63
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users