• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

More Power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gregg Wohlman
  • Start date Start date Apr 25, 2013
G

Gregg Wohlman

New Member
Apr 25, 2013
4
0
1
Apr 25, 2013
#1
  • Apr 25, 2013
  • #1
I have an 88' 5.0, e303 cams, GT40 heads (not sure if p or x), bbk headers, cold air intake (upgraded to MAF), cobra intake manifold, 19# injectors, and it's bored .030 over. Brakes upgraded to disc, 3.73 gears I believe, subframe connectors, back end lowered for better traction, cobra "R"s, flow master dump exhaust, and I think that's about it. I'm not sure what I'm pushing to the wheels right now but I would like to know what I can put in it or replace to give me more power. Long term, no budget. Ideas? Thank you!
 

foxbodymike87

Active Member
Jul 12, 2011
739
35
39
Apr 25, 2013
#2
  • Apr 25, 2013
  • #2
Forced induction.
 
G

Gregg Wohlman

New Member
Apr 25, 2013
4
0
1
Apr 25, 2013
#3
  • Apr 25, 2013
  • #3
I'm not sure what that means. Could you explain?
 
C

clemsonf250

Member
Nov 29, 1999
47
6
19
Upstate SC
Apr 25, 2013
#4
  • Apr 25, 2013
  • #4
supercharger, nitrous, turbo...
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Apr 25, 2013
#5
  • Apr 25, 2013
  • #5
Do a complete tune up of what you have - spark plugs, cap, rotor, spark plug wires, fuel and air filter. Dump the codes and fix any that come up.

Avoid cold air kits - they work good on the 2005 and later Mustangs but don't do much for the Fox body cars. Above all, stay away from setups that put the uncovered air filter in the engine compartment: they suck up hot, turbulent engine air and cost HP rather than improve it.
The stock airbox minus the silencer horn in the fenderwell is one of the best you can have. A K&N flat panel filter is a good choice as long as you don't use too much oil to coat it with.

Look at a 65 MM throttle body as a possible next step. Don't get foolish and try a 70 MM throttle body, since it is overkill for what you have. The V8 Explorers 1995-2000 have one that can be modified to fit if you are on a tight budget and have some fabricating or machinist skills.

If you want to stay with the 19 LB injectors, consider a larger MAF. The OEM Ford MAFs are not calibrated to injector size. The injector sizing is done in the computer’s internal programming. Aftermarket MAF’s “lie” to the computer in an attempt to fool the computer into changing the injector pulse on timing to match the increased airflow.

The only other MAF that is a one for one swap for a 93 and earlier 5.0 Mustang is the 94-95 Mustang 70 MM MAF.

94-95 Mustang GT MAF - $40-$100. It is 70 MM instead of the stock 55 MM on regular stangs built prior to 94. It uses a slip on duct on the side that goes to the throttle body and a 4 bolt flange on the other. You need a flange adapter to fit the stock slip on air ducting that goes to the air box. Wiring plugs right in with no changes. *1 *2

Once your replacement 70MM MAF is in place, disconnect the battery for about 10 minutes. When you reconnect the battery and start the engine, the computer will relearn the settings for the new MAF.

*1.) Metal flange adapter http://www.kustomz.com/cat3.html Buy the TR70 for $44.95. Or spend some time on eBay looking for one that may fit.

*2.) MAF & sensor interchange
The 94-95 Mustang 5.0 MAF & sensor is also found on:
1995-94 Mustang 3.8L F2VF-12B579-A2A,
1994-92 Crown Victoria 4.6L F2VF-12B579-A2A,
1995-94 Mustang, Mustang Cobra 5.0L F2VF-12B579-A2A,
1994-92 Town Car 4.6L F2VF-12B579-A2A,
1994-92 Grand Marquis 4.6L F2VF-12B579-A2A,
Evidently the –A1A, -A2A, AA, etc. on the end of the part number is a minor variant that did not change the operating specs. You should be able to ignore it and have everything work good.

A 155 LPH fuel pump, 24 lb injectors and a custom dyno tune & chip would be the next step after doing the tuneup addtional items listed above and fixing any codes you find. You may have to replace the MAF as part of the process.
 

ThatBear

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
143
30
38
Apr 25, 2013
#6
  • Apr 25, 2013
  • #6
Suspension upgrades are important too, they won't make more power, but will allow you to better use the power you do have. Also a simple thing to consider is under drive pulleys. Other than that, aftermarket heads and upgrade the rest of the valvetrain and look into a dyno tune. Also forced induction and stroker kits are always fun
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Apr 25, 2013
#7
  • Apr 25, 2013
  • #7
jrichker said:
Do a complete tune up of what you have - spark plugs, cap, rotor, spark plug wires, fuel and air filter. Dump the codes and fix any that come up.

Avoid cold air kits - they work good on the 2005 and later Mustangs but don't do much for the Fox body cars. Above all, stay away from setups that put the uncovered air filter in the engine compartment: they suck up hot, turbulent engine air and cost HP rather than improve it.
The stock airbox minus the silencer horn in the fenderwell is one of the best you can have. A K&N flat panel filter is a good choice as long as you don't use too much oil to coat it with.

Look at a 65 MM throttle body as a possible next step. Don't get foolish and try a 70 MM throttle body, since it is overkill for what you have. The V8 Explorers 1995-2000 have one that can be modified to fit if you are on a tight budget and have some fabricating or machinist skills.

If you want to stay with the 19 LB injectors, consider a larger MAF. The OEM Ford MAFs are not calibrated to injector size. The injector sizing is done in the computer’s internal programming. Aftermarket MAF’s “lie” to the computer in an attempt to fool the computer into changing the injector pulse on timing to match the increased airflow.

The only other MAF that is a one for one swap for a 93 and earlier 5.0 Mustang is the 94-95 Mustang 70 MM MAF.

94-95 Mustang GT MAF - $40-$100. It is 70 MM instead of the stock 55 MM on regular stangs built prior to 94. It uses a slip on duct on the side that goes to the throttle body and a 4 bolt flange on the other. You need a flange adapter to fit the stock slip on air ducting that goes to the air box. Wiring plugs right in with no changes. *1 *2

Once your replacement 70MM MAF is in place, disconnect the battery for about 10 minutes. When you reconnect the battery and start the engine, the computer will relearn the settings for the new MAF.

*1.) Metal flange adapter http://www.kustomz.com/cat3.html Buy the TR70 for $44.95. Or spend some time on eBay looking for one that may fit.

*2.) MAF & sensor interchange
The 94-95 Mustang 5.0 MAF & sensor is also found on:
1995-94 Mustang 3.8L F2VF-12B579-A2A,
1994-92 Crown Victoria 4.6L F2VF-12B579-A2A,
1995-94 Mustang, Mustang Cobra 5.0L F2VF-12B579-A2A,
1994-92 Town Car 4.6L F2VF-12B579-A2A,
1994-92 Grand Marquis 4.6L F2VF-12B579-A2A,
Evidently the –A1A, -A2A, AA, etc. on the end of the part number is a minor variant that did not change the operating specs. You should be able to ignore it and have everything work good.

A 155 LPH fuel pump, 24 lb injectors and a custom dyno tune & chip would be the next step after doing the tuneup addtional items listed above and fixing any codes you find. You may have to replace the MAF as part of the process.
Click to expand...

Disagree on the throttle body thing, the GT-40 family of intakes have an opening that's right around 68-69mm, with a few minutes and a Dremel they fit 70mm TBs perfectly. I ran a 70mm TB on an Explorer intake and a much more stockish setup than his for several years with no problems whatsoever.

Also, I'm all for budget-minded upgrades, but the 94-95 Mustang MAF meter is hard to find these days and is only marginally better than the stock 55mm unit. You could certainly go that route, but MY suggestion would be a nice aftermarket MAF, 75mm or bigger. A GOOD "calibrated" MAF will offer reasonable drivability with a 19/24/30lb injector. A real computer tune is always going to be better, but a bajillion 5.0 owners have run "calibrated" meters successfully for many years.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Apr 25, 2013
#8
  • Apr 25, 2013
  • #8
NIKwoaC said:
Disagree on the throttle body thing, the GT-40 family of intakes have an opening that's right around 68-69mm, with a few minutes and a Dremel they fit 70mm TBs perfectly. I ran a 70mm TB on an Explorer intake and a much more stockish setup than his for several years with no problems whatsoever.

Also, I'm all for budget-minded upgrades, but the 94-95 Mustang MAF meter is hard to find these days and is only marginally better than the stock 55mm unit. You could certainly go that route, but MY suggestion would be a nice aftermarket MAF, 75mm or bigger. A GOOD "calibrated" MAF will offer reasonable drivability with a 19/24/30lb injector. A real computer tune is always going to be better, but a bajillion 5.0 owners have run "calibrated" meters successfully for many years.
Click to expand...
The 65 MM TB was a recommendation based on the fact that with a 70 MM throttle body, a very small change in the throttle butterfly position causes a much larger change in airflow than it would with a 65 MM throttle body. This can be annoying in stop and go driving, trying to get a smooth start without jumping onto the car in front of you.

The MAF recommendation was based on cost and ease of adaptation. The 55 MM stock unit is roughly 2 5/32", while the 70 MM unit is 2 3/4". There is a significant difference in the amount of airflow that the 70 MM unit allows.
 
9

98gtvert

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2002
140
4
18
south carolina
Apr 25, 2013
#9
  • Apr 25, 2013
  • #9
How much you wanna spend? You could supercharge it, spray it, aluminum heads, stroker kit, throw a windsor in it. You can go as fast as you want to spend. I see you have headers, if they aren't long tubes that would be a cheaper spot to start. Some underdrive pullies will give you a couple horsepower. Have the heads worked
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Apr 25, 2013
#10
  • Apr 25, 2013
  • #10
jrichker said:
The 65 MM TB was a recommendation based on the fact that with a 70 MM throttle body, a very small change in the throttle butterfly position causes a much larger change in airflow than it would with a 65 MM throttle body. This can be annoying in stop and go driving, trying to get a smooth start without jumping onto the car in front of you.

The MAF recommendation was based on cost and ease of adaptation. The 55 MM stock unit is roughly 2 5/32", while the 70 MM unit is 2 3/4". There is a significant difference in the amount of airflow that the 70 MM unit allows.
Click to expand...

Like I said, I've driven a 70 mm TB for many years, in city traffic, without issue. The throttle angle/airflow argument is used a lot on the internet, but I have yet to see any real evidence or data that it actually causes drivability issues. In fact, I know of a couple guys who have managed to get 90mm TBs to work on street driven 302s (something I plan to experiment with this summer).
 
Reactions: toolow91

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Apr 26, 2013
#11
  • Apr 26, 2013
  • #11
Gregg Wohlman said:
I have an 88' 5.0, e303 cams, GT40 heads (not sure if p or x), bbk headers, cold air intake (upgraded to MAF), cobra intake manifold, 19# injectors, and it's bored .030 over. Brakes upgraded to disc, 3.73 gears I believe, subframe connectors, back end lowered for better traction, cobra "R"s, flow master dump exhaust, and I think that's about it. I'm not sure what I'm pushing to the wheels right now but I would like to know what I can put in it or replace to give me more power. Long term, no budget. Ideas? Thank you!
Click to expand...

Is this one of those rare twin cam 302's? I never thought of lowering the back end for better traction.....Brilliant!
 
Reactions: toolow91 and 88LX5.Oh
G

Gregg Wohlman

New Member
Apr 25, 2013
4
0
1
May 1, 2013
#12
  • May 1, 2013
  • #12
84Ttop said:
Is this one of those rare twin cam 302's? I never thought of lowering the back end for better traction.....Brilliant!
Click to expand...
I'm assuming this is sarcasm. I'm not much of a mechanic, I just bought the car about 3 months ago and haven't done any real work to it. You can mock me all you want but I posted on this forum to get help, not to get worthless comments from people like you.
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
May 1, 2013
#13
  • May 1, 2013
  • #13
Gregg Wohlman said:
I'm assuming this is sarcasm. I'm not much of a mechanic, I just bought the car about 3 months ago and haven't done any real work to it. You can mock me all you want but I posted on this forum to get help, not to get worthless comments from people like you.
Click to expand...
Roll with the punches buddy, there is a considerable amount of ball breaking that goes on here! I can appreciate how that came off and certainly mean no harm from that.
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,481
8,677
234
S.I.NY
May 2, 2013
#14
  • May 2, 2013
  • #14
Gregg Wohlman said:
I'm assuming this is sarcasm. I'm not much of a mechanic, I just bought the car about 3 months ago and haven't done any real work to it. You can mock me all you want but I posted on this forum to get help, not to get worthless comments from people like you.
Click to expand...
He is cool man it's all in good fun and has a real slick ride and knows his stuff


Sent from my iPhone using my fingers
 
Reactions: 84Ttop

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
May 2, 2013
#15
  • May 2, 2013
  • #15
84Ttop said:
Roll with the punches buddy, there is a considerable amount of ball breaking that goes on here! I can appreciate how that came off and certainly mean no harm from that.
Click to expand...

if that got his panties in a wad im just going to keep my comments to myself...
 
Reactions: 88LX5.Oh, toolow91 and 84Ttop
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
268
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
644
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
K
Digital Tuning Going heads/cam/intake. Do I need a tune?
  • karhoot
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
392
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 14, 2026
karhoot
K
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
212
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
E
1986 Convertable 5.0 GT
  • eneerg
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
215
The Welcome Wagon Sep 24, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?