• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Progress Thread Nasty Ninety Notch

  • Thread starter Thread starter joetrainer31
  • Start date Start date Mar 13, 2015
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • …
  • 35
Next
First Prev 7 of 35 Next Last

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Jul 12, 2015
#121
  • Jul 12, 2015
  • #121
mikestang63 said:
joe, not a big fan of those print o seal intake gaskets. They leak like a strainer. I would get some 1250s or 1262s gaskets. but that is just me.
Click to expand...
Mike,

I usually use the 1250s, but Ford called for this particular gasket set with these heads. Also, the 1250s look the same material wise as these -just smaller. Am I missing what you are saying about these gaskets?
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Jul 12, 2015
#122
  • Jul 12, 2015
  • #122
joetrainer31 said:
Mike,

I usually use the 1250s, but Ford called for this particular gasket set with these heads. Also, the 1250s look the same material wise as these -just smaller. Am I missing what you are saying about these gaskets?
Click to expand...

yeah. those gaskets leak. The S gaskets have steel reinforcement around the ports to keep them from deforming.
 

Chuckman

GTFO you fat, heavy bastard
15 Year Member
Oct 21, 2005
1,604
1,002
173
st. louis, mo
Jul 12, 2015
#123
  • Jul 12, 2015
  • #123
to be clear, the 1250s3 and 1262s3 is the steel-cored version that is friggin awesome (still not as good as the stock-replacement fel-pro's, but those are sized for the tiny e7's).

also keep the arp's, toss the frpp bolts. the arp's are reusable, the frpp are probably the torque-to-yield crap they started putting on the later 5.0's (most parts like that from frpp come from the o.e. source)
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Jul 12, 2015
#124
  • Jul 12, 2015
  • #124
Chuckman said:
to be clear, the 1250s3 and 1262s3 is the steel-cored version that is friggin awesome (still not as good as the stock-replacement fel-pro's, but those are sized for the tiny e7's).

also keep the arp's, toss the frpp bolts. the arp's are reusable, the frpp are probably the torque-to-yield crap they started putting on the later 5.0's (most parts like that from frpp come from the o.e. source)
Click to expand...
Yes, the X307s are high port heads thus the gaskets. So you prefer the ARP? I do too, but read the instructions for the other bolts. I'm a bit gun shy because of all the set backs. I was wanting to follow the directions exactly. I guess we will see what I end up with. Thanks gents!
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Jul 16, 2015
#125
  • Jul 16, 2015
  • #125
UPDATE: The new heads are going on!

I't won't be long before we have a fully operational Death Star.

(recap: GT40 X307 heads, Crane 1.7RRs, FRPP hardened push rods)
 

needstlc

Member
Jul 8, 2014
25
5
13
Jul 18, 2015
#126
  • Jul 18, 2015
  • #126
Can't wait to see this done. It reminds me how much I wish I could build my 89.
Good luck
 
Reactions: joetrainer31

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Jul 18, 2015
#127
  • Jul 18, 2015
  • #127
needstlc said:
Can't wait to see this done. It reminds me how much I wish I could build my 89.
Good luck
Click to expand...
Why wish? Do it!!!!
 

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Jul 18, 2015
#128
  • Jul 18, 2015
  • #128
joetrainer31 said:
UPDATE: The new heads are going on!

I't won't be long before we have a fully operational Death Star.

(recap: GT40 X307 heads, Crane 1.7RRs, FRPP hardened push rods)
Click to expand...
Good job Bro!! Remember to put RTV where the block meets the heads in all 4 corners!! What cam you got again??
 

needstlc

Member
Jul 8, 2014
25
5
13
Jul 18, 2015
#129
  • Jul 18, 2015
  • #129
FoxMustangLvr said:
Why wish? Do it!!!!
Click to expand...
Cause I'm 20 with a car payment and a bike that needs work.
I have big dreams for my mustang and I don't wanna do it tell I can do it right.
 

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Jul 18, 2015
#130
  • Jul 18, 2015
  • #130
needstlc said:
I have big dreams for my mustang and I don't wanna do it tell I can do it right.
Click to expand...

With this knowledge you are already ahead of the game. It takes time, money and patience for everyone to get the end result. I'm not even half way there and I make decent $ but have 3 kids.

What do you have? Maybe start your own progress thread with a couple pics of your Fox.
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Jul 19, 2015
#131
  • Jul 19, 2015
  • #131
FoxMustangLvr said:
Good job Bro!! Remember to put RTV where the block meets the heads in all 4 corners!! What cam you got again??
Click to expand...
Yep, we are using RTV for sure. I'm running a stock cam with 1.7RRs. The smog techs gave me a hard time with the last build that had an E cam -even though it is 50 state LEGAL. I'd come rollin up and they would just shake their heads. Didn't even care to see the CARB #.
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Jul 24, 2015
#132
  • Jul 24, 2015
  • #132
UPDATE: A Mystery for the Masses.

This car (i.e., Old Blue) has defied completion once again. This time it gave us a mystery problem. After much research and testing we figured out the problem, but for fun maybe you all would like to take a stab at it. It wouldn't cost y'all any valuable time or money like it did me. So, here goes:

For those of you keeping track this is the 4th time this car is going back together...

Took a little extra time to reroute the ACT Sensor where it belongs since I don't drive on the surface of Mars (i.e., intake runner #5).

Our tech Mike has seen this stage before...3Xs before. He now hates Mustangs.


Just about ready for start up...AGAIN.


It was just after this point we tried starting the car, but it would not have it. Not even a little. The thing just cranked and cranked, but nadda.

Here are the facts we had to work with in solving this mystery. Maybe you can piece it together.

1) Eng fired w/last set of heads, but wouldn't run due to valves not seated correctly.
2) Installed new GT40X307 heads to repl old heads.
3) Has new Ford/Crane 1.72 RRs.
4) New FRPP lifters (pre-soaked for 6 days).
5) New FRPP hardened, stock length pushrods.
6) All gskts & bolts rec for X307 heads incld.
7) Freshly rebuild 308cid short blk.
8) Stock camshaft installed (timed) correctly.
9) All vac lines & sensors installed correctly.
10) Firing order correct.
11) Valve train set up correctly (at cntrline of cam)
12) Air, fuel, and spark present, but NO GO!

What is wrong? What would you do next? Go!
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Jul 24, 2015
#133
  • Jul 24, 2015
  • #133
I'm not up to speed on your project, but did you check for codes? May be something simple..
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Jul 24, 2015
#134
  • Jul 24, 2015
  • #134
Also, you say air, fuel, and spark are present, are you calling compression air? Do you have compression?
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Jul 24, 2015
#135
  • Jul 24, 2015
  • #135
Boosted92LX said:
I'm not up to speed on your project, but did you check for codes? May be something simple..
Click to expand...
Its always a good idea to go to the basics. Good guess. There were no codes. The car previously started up with the old heads, but wouldn't run properly due to poor bowl work & valves not closing all the way. Codes were not the issue.

Guess again?
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Jul 24, 2015
#136
  • Jul 24, 2015
  • #136
Boosted92LX said:
Also, you say air, fuel, and spark are present, are you calling compression air? Do you have compression?
Click to expand...
I'm calling "air" air available to the engine (i.e., no clogs or obstructions in the intake tract.

You are getting much warmer with the "compression" idea though.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,975
2,957
194
Middle of Maine
Jul 24, 2015
#137
  • Jul 24, 2015
  • #137
The lifters are holding the valves open a tiny bit so it can't build enough compression to start. This is either caused by the valve lifter pre-load being to much (tight) or the lifters are pumped up and have not collapsed. This is not usually the issue with new lifters.
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Jul 24, 2015
#138
  • Jul 24, 2015
  • #138
Bullitt347 said:
The lifters are holding the valves open a tiny bit so it can't build enough compression to start. This is either caused by the valve lifter pre-load being to much (tight) or the lifters are pumped up and have not collapsed. This is not usually the issue with new lifters.
Click to expand...

Bullitt347, this is exactly what we thought. We used a leak down tester to verify that the valves were indeed failing to close. However, our lifter preload at the rocker are was no more than a couple of turns by hand. We couldn't even get to the minimum torque setting without loosing all compression. We were a bit stumped.

You are right that the lifters are involved with the lack of compression, as are the valves. However, the cause is another thing. The lifters and valves are only symptoms of a root cause.

Here's a hint: this is not normally a problem when purchasing a rebuilt short block.

Side question: what would cause a hydraulic lifter to stay pumped up? If I remember correctly, their design is to fail by collapsing. They would become a solid lifter if one took them apart and flipped the little internals upside down.
 

joetrainer31

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2013
869
364
114
SC
Jul 24, 2015
#139
  • Jul 24, 2015
  • #139
HINT: we wanted to experiment on cyl #1 for a resolution. We used 2 washers to solve the problem. Although, they cannot stay for good. They will need to be replaced by something else.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,975
2,957
194
Middle of Maine
Jul 24, 2015
#140
  • Jul 24, 2015
  • #140
Hyd. roller lifters in a non-roller block?
To your side question: I have performed several head gasket jobs on various engines over the years. If you are real good, you can have the heads off while the engine is still hot. What happens is during the dis-assembly process, one of the first things to happen is taking rocker arms off and then pushrods out. If the engine is still hot, the lifters may stay pumped up due to residual oil pressure so to speak. When you go back together, the lifter is "up" and when you set the rockers on (side note: this happens more often on pedestal mount rockers where there is no lash/pre-load adjustment, just a torque spec for the rocker arm bolt) the lifter does not bleed down, it just opens the valve instead. Even rolling the engine over will not collapse the lifter initially. It usually has to set for a while against spring pressure to eventually bleed down and close the valve and allow the engine to start.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • …
  • 35
Next
First Prev 7 of 35 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
304
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
947
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
new :poo: box, may need to hit you guys up for 79-82 info when i fix thIs turd.
  • rednotch
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
Noobz347
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
579
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?