• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Need some suspension help

  • Thread starter Thread starter NewToFord
  • Start date Start date Mar 27, 2013
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
N

NewToFord

Member
Oct 7, 2008
318
1
19
CT
Mar 27, 2013
#1
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #1
Now that I finally got my 93 408 running, its time to work on the suspension. The car has alot of low end torque and basically 1st, 2nd, and 3rd gear are useless. The car spins like crazy even at rolling starts. I have the 94 95 spindles on the car, so I am going to run a 17 nitto drag radial. Any idea how big I can go? I need some suggestions. I'm thinking torque box upgrades, upper and lower control arms, and weld in subframes. Can anybody suggest a good brand to upgrade. The car is mostly a street car. I really do not want to get into a full MM upgrade unless I have too.
__________________
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,174
21,341
234
Box behind Walmart
Mar 27, 2013
#2
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #2
MM or Kenny Brown full length sub-frame connectors
Torque box reinforcement kit
I would not skimp on the control arms. Let your conscience be your guide.
275 series tire on a 9 inch rim should clear with no modifications. You may have to roll fender wells with the same tire and a 10 inch rim.
Differential cover with pre-load bolts.
Hardened axle lugs for the rears.
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Mar 27, 2013
#3
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #3
Big block torque and no subframe connectors or torque box reinforcements?? I can hear your chassis crying from here! It's a good thing that you can't get traction right now, because when you do, everything is going to turn to spaghetti. I highly suggest the MM full length subframe connectors. They are very beefy and extend all the way from the firewall to the torque boxes. $150 is not a lot considering the huge benefits. Don't bother with the powder coated ones. Just paint them yourself. I always purchase my MM stuff from vendors on Corral. They have cheaper pricing than the MM website. Wild Rides is well known for their torque box reinforcements.

What wheels are you running out back?
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Mar 27, 2013
#4
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #4
I agree with the others on the subframe connectors. Hit up Sharad for some nice control arms and spherical bushings from UPR. And on a final note, ditch the nittos for a real tire from Mickey Thompson!!!
 
Reactions: Sharad

marks89

Member
Sep 26, 2012
32
4
19
oklahoma panhandle.
Mar 27, 2013
#5
  • Mar 27, 2013
  • #5
What 84ttop said! i have upr front and rear suspension. They are very helpful if you have any questions on set up.
 
Reactions: Sharad
N

NewToFord

Member
Oct 7, 2008
318
1
19
CT
Mar 28, 2013
#6
  • Mar 28, 2013
  • #6
ok thanks guys. Should I go with adjustable lca's or the standard lca's? right now I'm thinking mm full length subframes, torque box renforcements, mm lca's and mm uca's simular to the old ford racing ones.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,174
21,341
234
Box behind Walmart
Mar 28, 2013
#7
  • Mar 28, 2013
  • #7
NewToFord said:
ok thanks guys. Should I go with adjustable lca's or the standard lca's? right now I'm thinking mm full length subframes, torque box renforcements, mm lca's and mm uca's simular to the old ford racing ones.
Click to expand...

You should only need weight jackers if you plan on changing tires back and forth for like street/track or something like that where the outside diameter changes.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Mar 28, 2013
#8
  • Mar 28, 2013
  • #8
I like how saleen RCA's have the 3 piece bushings. The middle is hard poly for straight line wheel hop prevention and softer outers are for cornering if I heard right.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Mar 28, 2013
#9
  • Mar 28, 2013
  • #9
Do it right the first time and don't look back.

MM rear LCA
FRPP rear UCA
MM full length SBF
Wild Ride Torque box plates
If you don't have one a driveshaft safety loop
T/A or similar diff cover
min 31 spline carrier and axles
 

Sharad

ALWAYS choose the V over the P!!! Wait... what?
Jan 5, 2011
1,562
480
94
Fort Myers, Florida
Mar 28, 2013
#10
  • Mar 28, 2013
  • #10
84Ttop said:
I agree with the others on the subframe connectors. Hit up Sharad for some nice control arms and spherical bushings from UPR. And on a final note, ditch the nittos for a real tire from Mickey Thompson!!!
Click to expand...
marks89 said:
What 84ttop said! i have upr front and rear suspension. They are very helpful if you have any questions on set up.
Click to expand...

Thanks guys. Yes, I would recommend UPR full length subframe connectors, UPR torque box reinforcements, UPR Pro Street adjustable upper and lower control arms, and either M/T ET Streets or ET Street Radials. That setup would dead hook on the track. Setting the car up to hook on the street is a little different, but totally feasible.
 
N

NewToFord

Member
Oct 7, 2008
318
1
19
CT
Mar 29, 2013
#11
  • Mar 29, 2013
  • #11
mikestang63 said:
Do it right the first time and don't look back.

MM rear LCA
FRPP rear UCA
MM full length SBF
Wild Ride Torque box plates
If you don't have one a driveshaft safety loop
T/A or similar diff cover
min 31 spline carrier and axles
Click to expand...

Heres what I did.
I ordered MM full length SBF and MM LCA. I ordered from a dealer. I called MM today to order more parts, and get tech support. They recomended their panhard setup. And thier adjustable LCA's. Heres my thing. The car spins 1st through 3rd gear. It is mostly a weekend warrior. I just want the car to hook up. I have no problem spending the money on the panhard setup. If I do new UCA's and bushings its about the same price. They also told me with the panhard I do not need torque plate renforcements. So I'm not sure what to do. My other issue is the clearance. Their site says that I may have issues with 2.5 flowmaster systems. I have a Mac 3 inch cat back on the car. I am really unsure what to do at this point.
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Mar 29, 2013
#12
  • Mar 29, 2013
  • #12
I had the MM pandard bar on my car. It did a great job of locating the rear end and completely eliminated lateral movement. A big plus if you are trying to squeeze big tires in the rear. You won't have to worry about that dreaded tire rub during cornering.

I had 2.5" flowmaster tails and did not have any clearance issues. It was VERY tight though. I don't see 3" pipes clearing at all. Honestly, there is no reason to have 3" tailpipes on any car, IMO. Even at 1000hp, 2.5" tails do not create a noticeable amount of backpressure compared to 3" tails. I can see how you wouldn't need upper torque box reinforcements with a PHB, but lower reinforcements still seem like they would be necessary.

I would still probably weld in some lower reinforcements, but leave the uppers alone. The ultimate setup to increase launch ability would be a Torque Arm with that PHB. They are not cheap, but definitely worth considering down the road though.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,977
2,959
194
Middle of Maine
Mar 30, 2013
#13
  • Mar 30, 2013
  • #13
RacEoHolic330 said:
Honestly, there is no reason to have 3" tailpipes on any car, IMO. Even at 1000hp, 2.5" tails do not create a noticeable amount of backpressure compared to 3" tails. .
Click to expand...


Really?..........1000 HP and 2.5" tail pipes are not a restriction? I find that hard to believe, unless of course the rest of the exhaust upstream of the tails is the restriction. IDK, maybe I am wrong, but 1000 HP is a lot of ponies to push thru 2.5" exhaust.
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Mar 30, 2013
#14
  • Mar 30, 2013
  • #14
Bullitt347 said:
Really?..........1000 HP and 2.5" tail pipes are not a restriction? I find that hard to believe, unless of course the rest of the exhaust upstream of the tails is the restriction. IDK, maybe I am wrong, but 1000 HP is a lot of pones to push thru 2.5" exhaust.
Click to expand...
I will have to agree. I was told that I would pick up by switching to larger exhaust on mine. I currently have 3.5" and was told I should switch to 4" I probably will switch at some point but going to run it like it is for a while though. I have seen on a friends car the header blow out of the collector from too much back pressure in the exhaust, it wasn't a pretty sight.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,036
1,625
194
NJ
Mar 30, 2013
#15
  • Mar 30, 2013
  • #15
Panhard bar only clears a couple exhausts, a 3 inch mac is probably not one of them.
It does not clear my flowmaster 2.5 3 chamber kit, i know that for sure.

Dynomax ultraflo supposidly fits best.

Regardless of whether or not a 2.5 inch kit handles 1000hp, i would NOT give up tailpipes for a few hp on a street car. On a driver, there really isn't any difference in 900 or 800 hp.

I also agree you must do the lower torque boxes, all the stress from your new found traction has to go somewhere.
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Mar 30, 2013
#16
  • Mar 30, 2013
  • #16
I must be hanging around the turbo boys too much these days. A lot of rules change when you put a turbo on a car, and I probably should have put that disclaimer in my post. There was a thread on turbomustangs.com where a guy tested the back pressure differences between an open 3.5" downpipe, straight through exhaust with no mufflers, full exhaust with mufflers and tails, and then dumps after the mufflers. There was almost no difference between all the different tests. The difference between open DP and full exhaust was only a couple psi of backpressure at the turbo. On a street car, nobody will ever notice.

I would love to see somebody do a backpressure test comparing exhaust sizes on a supercharged car. Dyno tests have been done comparing different mufflers, ect., but there are too many variables during dyno testing so I would have better faith in just measuring the backpressure at the collectors.
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Mar 30, 2013
#17
  • Mar 30, 2013
  • #17
You are excused, lmao. I agree, a turbo car is a totally different ball game and exhaust size at a certain point is trivial at best.
 

Sharad

ALWAYS choose the V over the P!!! Wait... what?
Jan 5, 2011
1,562
480
94
Fort Myers, Florida
Apr 1, 2013
#18
  • Apr 1, 2013
  • #18
RacEoHolic330 said:
Honestly, there is no reason to have 3" tailpipes on any car, IMO. Even at 1000hp, 2.5" tails do not create a noticeable amount of backpressure compared to 3" tails
Click to expand...

RacEoHolic330 said:
I must be hanging around the turbo boys too much these days. A lot of rules change when you put a turbo on a car, and I probably should have put that disclaimer in my post. There was a thread on turbomustangs.com where a guy tested the back pressure differences between an open 3.5" downpipe, straight through exhaust with no mufflers, full exhaust with mufflers and tails, and then dumps after the mufflers. There was almost no difference between all the different tests. The difference between open DP and full exhaust was only a couple psi of backpressure at the turbo. On a street car, nobody will ever notice.

I would love to see somebody do a backpressure test comparing exhaust sizes on a supercharged car. Dyno tests have been done comparing different mufflers, ect., but there are too many variables during dyno testing so I would have better faith in just measuring the backpressure at the collectors.
Click to expand...

My supercharged 351W literally blew the 3.5" mufflers apart.

 

Attachments

  • mufflers_zpsf0f9793d.webp
    40.2 KB · Views: 158
  • mufflers_zpsf0f9793d.webp
    40.2 KB · Views: 148

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Apr 1, 2013
#19
  • Apr 1, 2013
  • #19
Yikes. That's a problem right there.
 
Reactions: Sharad

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,174
21,341
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 1, 2013
#20
  • Apr 1, 2013
  • #20
Definition of exhaust restriction.
 
Reactions: Sharad
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
616
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
514
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Thursday at 5:49 PM
85GT4V
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
221
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?