• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Need your opinion on a decision about SC vs Bolt ons

  • Thread starter Thread starter spederman
  • Start date Start date Jan 12, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

spederman

Member
Apr 13, 2005
732
0
16
Jan 12, 2006
#1
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #1
I have been giving this decision a lot of thought and need your guys opinions to help me out. Tell me if my reasoning is correct here...

I was thinking at first to go with all the bolt ons (headers,plenum,TB,CAI,Xcal2 tune) which would cost me about $1500 or so. I definately want to go SC in the future, how soon would depend on how quick i save up. So i was ready to drop all this cash next month for bolt ons to tie me over.

BUT.. then i started thinking, the max the stock internals can handle safely is around 385-390 rwhp with a good tune. I should easily be able to get that with just a SC, right? Whether or not i do all bolt ons first. So whats the benefit of bolt ons when a SC can be boosted to give me the max power my engine can handle. So now I am thinking that save that $1500 from bolt ons and wait till this summer and just go SC'd. Maybe i can even find a deal on a decent used SC and get it sooner. Whats the point of having bolt ons if i am limiting my self to the boost of the SC since it might blow my engine.

Am i correct with this idea of thinking?

BTW i already have catback, x pipe, under drive pulleys. So at least stuff is flowing somewhat more free than stock which should help the SC be more effecient.
 

'13_ImpactBlue_GT

Angry Little Elf
Mar 30, 2005
872
2
98
Where the men are men and the sheep are nervous
Jan 12, 2006
#2
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #2
You would have to get rid of the underdrive pullies if you get a blower however your mods are a good foundation for a supercharger: have you considered getting different rear end gears? and is your car auto or stick?
 
E

exindust

New Member
May 8, 2004
329
0
0
Moorpark, CA
Jan 12, 2006
#3
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #3
There is no decision to be made...

Blow it and be done with it and dont regret it.... just save for internals from that point on and pray you dont boom.
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Jan 12, 2006
#4
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #4
exindust said:
There is no decision to be made...

Blow it and be done with it and dont regret it.... just save for internals from that point on and pray you dont boom.
Click to expand...
+1. smart guy.

you can easily get 400hp out of a Vortech S or SQ trim, or Paxton Novi 2000. Thats exactly what I'm doing. All those bolt-ons will only compliment the blower set-up. The problem is, once you get closer to 400, the more bolt-ons you have, the more power, so they could put you over that threshold and into the "danger zone" if you will. The only bolt-ons I'd do with a blower would be a 75mm T/B and Plenum and Full exhaust. The Tune is what will be the difference between blowing your engine and running it safely at 380-400hp. To be on the safe side I want to stay right around 380.

Give MPH a call and order a Mongoose kit. He has a few hundred cars running a Mongoose kit with stock bottom and has never lost an engine, and its because of their tune. Its ALL in the TUNE!

of course, Hotmustang331 will chime in and tell you to stay N/A. with his numbers and new times, I can see why he feels that way. very impressive on his part.

but my vote is run a Novi 2000 Mongoose kit @ 8psi, and save for forged internals of a built short block, and maybe even ported heads. Im done with boltons until my bottom end is forged. until then Im going with the Novi.

Forced Induction isnt the end all to making horsepower, but its a lot easier with these engines.
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Jan 12, 2006
#5
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #5
double post. i rule
 
S

spederman

Member
Apr 13, 2005
732
0
16
Jan 12, 2006
#6
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #6
Oh, the car is a 2002 GT 5spd, and i also have 3.55 gears. which should be good if i go S/C.

I understand the point that bolt ons would definately help the S/C work efficiently and deliver more HP, but i wouldnt really need it, since i would be at the max potential of my stock internals. Right?

Also, i am definately going to go with MPH mongoose kit with either the NOVI or vortech Sq, what psi would i have to be running to hit about 385rwhp?
 

98blackmagic

New Member
Jun 2, 2005
386
0
0
wouldnt you like to know
Jan 12, 2006
#7
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #7
Do you know the saying, once you get blown you never go back or how about happyness is being blown?



Get the supercharger and call it a day.
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Jan 12, 2006
#8
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #8
spederman said:
Also, i am definately going to go with MPH mongoose kit with either the NOVI or vortech Sq, what psi would i have to be running to hit about 385rwhp?
Click to expand...
about 8-10psi will be fine on a stock motor, thats what MPH told me when I asked. i'll probably stick to 8psi to play it safe.
 

drew_shipley

New Member
Aug 5, 2004
63
0
0
Stow, OH
Jan 12, 2006
#9
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #9
Supercharger for sure. I'd only do full exhaust, gears, and a short throw before getting one. You might also consider some suspension mods as well such as LCAs and Subframes to help the car handle the new power.
 

lgndracer

New Member
Feb 21, 2004
393
0
0
Sumner, WA
Jan 12, 2006
#10
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #10
Another vote for the S/C, TB, MAF, full exhaust and a good conservitive tune.
 

TacBear

Founding Member
Dec 28, 2001
1,243
0
0
Jasper, AL
Jan 12, 2006
#11
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #11
Go with the SC...........................
I just went 12.90 spinning/pedalling 2nd and spinning in 3rd and letting off at 1100' with STOCK gears on my "Street" tune (about 350 rwhp). When I get my AFR right I should easily be in the 12.5's
 
S

spederman

Member
Apr 13, 2005
732
0
16
Jan 12, 2006
#12
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #12
You've twisted my arm guys.

Supercharger it is. Now only if i can actually stay away from my money, not spend it, and save some more by the summer to get the S/C. Its going to be hard, but man is it going to be sweet.
 

reddrgn01gt

New Member
Jun 8, 2005
161
0
0
Pittsburgh, PA
Jan 12, 2006
#13
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #13
I would open up the exhaust first and then get the blower. That was my original plan .
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jan 12, 2006
#14
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #14
STAY N/A! STAY N/A!!!!!!! LOL J/K just had to hahah. You will love being S/Cd. I just dont want the worry of my engine letting go everytime I nail it. Now I have a car that trappes almost 109 and is completely safe and reliable. 10 passes and no problems at all.
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Jan 12, 2006
#15
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #15
Not to hijack the thread, but I was looking at your times hotmustang331. I just got Patriot heads (stage 2) and patriot stage 2 cams. I have ud pulleys, full exhaust and 3.73's. I am being told I should get around 320 RWHP. Should I expect 12.5's?

I hope so I have a few local LS1's to pick on.
 

reddrgn01gt

New Member
Jun 8, 2005
161
0
0
Pittsburgh, PA
Jan 13, 2006
#16
  • Jan 13, 2006
  • #16
01Steeda said:
Not to hijack the thread, but I was looking at your times hotmustang331. I just got Patriot heads (stage 2) and patriot stage 2 cams. I have ud pulleys, full exhaust and 3.73's. I am being told I should get around 320 RWHP. Should I expect 12.5's?

I hope so I have a few local LS1's to pick on.
Click to expand...

If you have a suspension set up for drag racing, have done some weight reduction, and know how to drive, it is very possible with sticky tires. It is impossible to know without knowing your setup.
 

DocG

5th graders > me. They're not bant
Sep 25, 2005
8,297
1,358
194
Cincinnati area
Jan 13, 2006
#17
  • Jan 13, 2006
  • #17
Blow me...come on...somebody blow me! Please!
 
T

tooblue02

New Member
May 10, 2004
86
0
0
Groton Connecticut
Jan 13, 2006
#18
  • Jan 13, 2006
  • #18
My vote is for the blower, KB is also good to look at.
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Jan 13, 2006
#19
  • Jan 13, 2006
  • #19
helty said:
The problem is, once you get closer to 400, the more bolt-ons you have, the more power, so they could put you over that threshold and into the "danger zone" if you will.
Click to expand...

I dissagree with this at least as far as exhaust bolt-ons. Most boltons only free up power not produce it like a power adder, so by adding say, headers and full exhuast, you have not put any more stress on the internals.
 

BooWFO

New Member
May 10, 2005
991
0
0
Louisville, KY
Jan 13, 2006
#20
  • Jan 13, 2006
  • #20
Blower. OR n2o.
Mod motor's just don't respond as well to the bolton's as the old 5.0's did and cost more to do.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
L
2004 Mustang GT issues after bolt-ons added
  • Leo090
  • Nov 1, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 24, 2025
Leo090
L
X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
134
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
W
Megasquirt base tune for 94 5.0
  • wrx757
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
214
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 6, 2026
wrx757
W
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?