• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

New Car, New Project

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rjaaaaaa
  • Start date Start date Jul 16, 2016
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Oct 6, 2016
#41
  • Oct 6, 2016
  • #41
Moosee1955 said:
One thing I learned years back is make sure all your paint products are same brand and compatible with each other. I'm a little confused though, why would putting a urethane paint make lacquer primer lift? The other way around, putting lacquer on top of urethane might make it lift. Again I'm no expert, and have only sprayed 4 cars, 3 motorcycles. I used to use dupont lacquer primer, I think it was called 131, it's been a lot of years back. I sprayed single stage centari enamel or 2 stage base coat/ clear on top, never had a problem. Maybe your brand primer needs lacquer top coat! My two cents worth, Moose.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
 

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,738
3,187
203
Taylorsville ky
Oct 6, 2016
#42
  • Oct 6, 2016
  • #42
Rjaaaaaa said:
Started putting it back together today. Headlights, taillights, spoiler, installed door handles, door and hatch locks and rubber seals around door and hatch.
A little trim makes a big difference.
Click to expand...

The blue looks good man, congratulations on all your hard work paying off,looking forward to seeing it finished
 

Rjaaaaaa

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2016
217
159
63
Oct 6, 2016
#43
  • Oct 6, 2016
  • #43
madmike1157 said:
Click to expand...
Hey, I don't know anything about this paint stuff, only took the advice of the local paint shop. They said the lacquer primer might still be evaporating through the base coat, the body guy who has been painting and selling paint for years said that it could possibly cause small holes (vents) in the paint??? I didn't want to take a chance, I need as much as possible in the plus column since I have no experience or education on this stuff.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Oct 6, 2016
#44
  • Oct 6, 2016
  • #44
Rjaaaaaa said:
Hey, I don't know anything about this paint stuff, only took the advice of the local paint shop. They said the lacquer primer might still be evaporating through the base coat, the body guy who has been painting and selling paint for years said that it could possibly cause small holes (vents) in the paint??? I didn't want to take a chance, I need as much as possible in the plus column since I have no experience or education on this stuff.
Click to expand...
You've quoted the wrong guy. I was questioning the previous guy (who was giving you advice after the fact).
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

Rjaaaaaa

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2016
217
159
63
Oct 6, 2016
#45
  • Oct 6, 2016
  • #45
madmike1157 said:
You've quoted the wrong guy. I was questioning the previous guy (who was giving you advice after the fact).
Click to expand...
sorry about that
 

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
Discordia
Oct 7, 2016
#46
  • Oct 7, 2016
  • #46
Moosee1955 said:
One thing I learned years back is make sure all your paint products are same brand and compatible with each other. I'm a little confused though, why would putting a urethane paint make lacquer primer lift? The other way around, putting lacquer on top of urethane might make it lift. Again I'm no expert, and have only sprayed 4 cars, 3 motorcycles. I used to use dupont lacquer primer, I think it was called 131, it's been a lot of years back. I sprayed single stage centari enamel or 2 stage base coat/ clear on top, never had a problem. Maybe your brand primer needs lacquer top coat! My two cents worth, Moose.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Lacquer primer (and topcoats) can lift because they can be returned to a wet solution by applying a heavy topcoat of most any solvent based system. The solvents in the new product essentially rewet the primer. Modern solvents can't be used to reduce a lacquer based product because of incompatibility, but can cause the lacquer system to become a wet solution.

If this doesn't happen to you fairly quick, from the first few seconds to about five minutes, then it probably won't happen. Mind you, if consecutive layers are laid on too wet, or too quickly, the solvents still can soak down to the primer layer and cause lifting.

They don't always lift, but can relatively easy.

Lacquer on top of a eurethane can cause lifting because of the caustic nature of what it is reduced with (lacquer thinner).

Once you sand a eurethane surface, you open the paint up to allow adhesion for what you are topping it with. If it is lacquer, it gets soaked with the thinner and will usually cause the underlying base to return to solution, breaking the bond of it from the surface and swell because of the additional solvents present. This causes the clear coat to float and "wrinkle" giving you that lifted look.

When we used to shoot lacquer systems back in the late seventies and into the early eighties, lifting was a general issue that you had to learn to work with when repairing a previous paint job. It didn't seem difficult at the time, but that was just part of painting then.

So, if you use a lacquer product now, such as rattle can primer, it's best to start coverage with a couple fairly light coats prior to heavier coverage coats. Allow those first coats a little extra time to dry prior to the heavier coats as well. That provides kind of a "barrier" coat.

I hope this makes sense. I could probably explain this to you in about one minute talking to you, but typing it out seems to take forever. If you want a more detailed explanation, pm me.

BTW, lifting can occur with eurethane products as well. Somewhat the same principal as listed above. It's just less likely since modern reducers aren't as aggressive in causing the underlying layers to return to solution.
 
Last edited by a moderator: Oct 7, 2016
Reactions: A5literMan, skyline247 and RaggedGT

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Oct 7, 2016
#47
  • Oct 7, 2016
  • #47
Davedacarpainter said:
Lacquer primer (and topcoats) can lift because they can be returned to a wet solution by applying a heavy topcoat of most any solvent based system. The solvents in the new product essentially rewet the primer. Modern solvents can't be used to reduce a lacquer based product because of incompatibility, but can cause the lacquer system to become a wet solution.

If this doesn't happen to you fairly quick, from the first few seconds to about five minutes, then it probably won't happen. Mind you, if consecutive layers are laid on too wet, or too quickly, the solvents still can soak down to the primer layer and cause lifting.

They don't always lift, but can relatively easy.

Lacquer on top of a eurethane can cause lifting because of the caustic nature of what it is reduced with (lacquer thinner).

Once you sand a eurethane surface, you open the paint up to allow adhesion for what you are topping it with. If it is lacquer, it gets soaked with the thinner and will usually cause the underlying base to return to solution, breaking the bond of it from the surface and swell because of the additional solvents present. This causes the clear coat to float and "wrinkle" giving you that lifted look.

When we used to shoot lacquer systems back in the late seventies and into the early eighties, lifting was a general issue that you had to learn to work with when repairing a previous paint job. It didn't seem difficult at the time, but that was just part of painting then.

So, if you use a lacquer product now, such as rattle can primer, it's best to start coverage with a couple fairly light coats prior to heavier coverage coats. Allow those first coats a little extra time to dry prior to the heavier coats as well. That provides kind of a "barrier" coat.

I hope this makes sense. I could probably explain this to you in about one minute talking to you, but typing it out seems to take forever. If you want a more detailed explanation, pm me.

BTW, lifting can occur with eurethane products as well. Somewhat the same principal as listed above. It's just less likely since modern reducers aren't as aggressive in causing the underlying layers to return to solution.
Click to expand...

***Sigh **

Aren't you a painter by trade? How many times over the years do you spose you've looked at the can that says urethane on it and subconsciously added an "e" to the front?

3:35 AM? Clearly that was where the error in spelling occurred....you were still asleep?
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter, skyline247 and Kman92

Davedacarpainter

Chicks can make things hard if they’re inspired...
SN Certified Technician
Nov 28, 2015
11,833
11,633
203
Discordia
Oct 7, 2016
#48
  • Oct 7, 2016
  • #48
madmike1157 said:
***Sigh **

Aren't you a painter by trade? How many times over the years do you spose you've looked at the can that says urethane on it and subconsciously added an "e" to the front?

3:35 AM? Clearly that was where the error in spelling occurred....you were still asleep?
Click to expand...
Thank you Mr. Fix It.

I was supporting Britain by getting out of the eu.
 

Mstng93SSP

You have a nice rear end there Dave.
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
2,993
3,500
184
Mililani, Hawaii
Oct 7, 2016
#49
  • Oct 7, 2016
  • #49
The only proper way to avoid lifting paint, and mismatched products is to fly Dave in. Has paint gun, will travel......sometimes.
 
Reactions: billison, a91what, 90sickfox and 3 others

Rjaaaaaa

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2016
217
159
63
Oct 9, 2016
#50
  • Oct 9, 2016
  • #50
ok been putting it back together, put on the window trim, mirrors, new window runner and quarter windows. Makes a big difference. I'll wait on the windshield and rear window till I sand and buff. 10 days should be long enough.
While I had a few minutes I thought I'd do the wheels in the correct color.
Hey madmike, since you didn't like my horses what do you think of my hood?
 

Attachments

  • 102_0429.webp
    491.3 KB · Views: 257
  • 102_0435.webp
    442.7 KB · Views: 242
  • 102_0436.webp
    362.6 KB · Views: 252

Rjaaaaaa

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2016
217
159
63
Oct 9, 2016
#51
  • Oct 9, 2016
  • #51
A little off topic but how many remember these tear drop bubble hoods?
 

Attachments

  • 102_0250.webp
    181.7 KB · Views: 247
  • 102_0251.webp
    207.2 KB · Views: 264

RaggedGT

Been here over a DECADE and still no CT
Mod Dude
Jul 20, 2014
4,738
3,187
203
Taylorsville ky
Oct 9, 2016
#52
  • Oct 9, 2016
  • #52
Rjaaaaaa said:
ok been putting it back together, put on the window trim, mirrors, new window runner and quarter windows. Makes a big difference. I'll wait on the windshield and rear window till I sand and buff. 10 days should be long enough.
While I had a few minutes I thought I'd do the wheels in the correct color.
Hey madmike, since you didn't like my horses what do you think of my hood?
Click to expand...
I'm guessing you are putting a 306 in it? lol
I dig that color man-looks like it layed out really nicely
 

Rjaaaaaa

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2016
217
159
63
Oct 9, 2016
#53
  • Oct 9, 2016
  • #53
RaggedGT said:
I'm guessing you are putting a 306 in it? lol
I dig that color man-looks like it layed out really nicely
Click to expand...
Thanks, yea the motor was recently done I was told by PO ?, just pulled it out too freshen the engine bay and engine outside, it ran strong before I took it out.
 
Reactions: 1990slow50H and RaggedGT

Rjaaaaaa

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2016
217
159
63
Oct 27, 2016
#54
  • Oct 27, 2016
  • #54
Yahooooooo! The engine is back in it's home, sat it in today and started hooking things back up. It went in like it had eyeballs, dropped right on the motor mounts first shot. Not bad for doing it all with one person.
Took some photos of the install but now I can't find them on the sd card ????? I should have it running tomorrow. I'll get some more pic's.
 
Reactions: RaggedGT and 1990slow50H

Rjaaaaaa

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2016
217
159
63
Oct 28, 2016
#55
  • Oct 28, 2016
  • #55
Here are the pic's, mo st wiring and hoses are done. Hopefully it won't be long before I hear that rumble in the garage again.
 
Reactions: Black1987 and Davedacarpainter

1990slow50H

Active Member
Jul 16, 2009
66
27
38
Spring Lake MI
Oct 29, 2016
#56
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #56
Looking good!
 

Rjaaaaaa

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2016
217
159
63
Oct 29, 2016
#57
  • Oct 29, 2016
  • #57
Well it didn't work out today just didn't have the time but I did run down an awesome deal on a Mishimoto heavy duty aluminum 3 core radiator.
For $80
 

Attachments

  • rad1.webp
    345 KB · Views: 276
  • rad2.webp
    695.1 KB · Views: 269

Rjaaaaaa

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2016
217
159
63
Oct 30, 2016
#58
  • Oct 30, 2016
  • #58
Had a few minutes today and took a break from the car and fabbed up a bracket to hold "THE BOTTLE". Oh yea !! Lookin good !!
 

Rjaaaaaa

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2016
217
159
63
Nov 1, 2016
#59
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #59
IT'S ALIVE !!!!!!!!!!
Well it's finally running again and it sure feels good to hear it again.
Installed that 3 core aluminum radiator with shroud and 16" fan.
Replaced the speedo cable (again) and it's no fun.
running a little rough at idle, might have a vacuum line open somewhere.
All in all it was a good day at the office.
 
Reactions: skyline247, Davedacarpainter and 1990slow50H

1990slow50H

Active Member
Jul 16, 2009
66
27
38
Spring Lake MI
Nov 1, 2016
#60
  • Nov 1, 2016
  • #60
Congratulations, you sure are making quick work with this project
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

What's Your New Year Project Plans?
  • Habu135
  • Jan 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
740
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Habu135
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
943
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
496
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
C
C4 trans help needed
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
189
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2026
CPH89LX
C
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
707
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?