• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

New intake?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jared Hess
  • Start date Start date Dec 20, 2012
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

DuDNoTcH

Member
Dec 22, 2009
82
2
9
Dec 23, 2012
#41
  • Dec 23, 2012
  • #41
NIKwoaC said:
My old GT40 next to my TFS-R. Like a knife at a gun fight lol.



Not saying the right answer for everyone is the TFS-R and that GT40s should be melted down and turned into beer cans... The '40 has its place, and that's usually on mild 302s. But if you're serious about making power, aftermarket intakes are a leg up on the '40 no matter how you slice it.
Click to expand...
lol size dont mean .. u aint moving the cfm then why have the biger intake??? bigger intake = bigger $$$$.... a BIG waste for combo that this thread is about..... hey Jared. you do what u want..but listening to these clowns will get you no where. but an empty wallet.
 

Attachments

  • DSCN0430.webp
    78.3 KB · Views: 67

DuDNoTcH

Member
Dec 22, 2009
82
2
9
Dec 23, 2012
#42
  • Dec 23, 2012
  • #42
Jared Hess said:
Nothing against DuDnotch but reading one of his threads and those two comments I'm assuming he isn't liked much round here
Click to expand...
not liked much cause i speak the truth. listen man.. you decide what u wanna do.. but half these clowns posting this crap brag about having 12sec cars. with 10sec parts.....

you wanna run 12s thats fine.. u can run high 10's with the intake you have. jus sayin.


im just trying to help you see the light. i tell you honestly..your combo is not the greatest.. you're intake is fine for what you have..no reason for spending money to buy something else... it's tough love. but seems honesty is something frowned upon now a days.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 23, 2012
#43
  • Dec 23, 2012
  • #43
This is getting a little heavy fellas, lets keep it light. No need to start rolling up your shirt sleeves here.

DuDNoTcH.....your advice is appreciated, but you need to work on your tact. The name calling, the stand offish attitude, the sarcasm....gotta get a handle on it bro!

Consider this fair warning.
 
Reactions: gearheadboy

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Dec 23, 2012
#44
  • Dec 23, 2012
  • #44
DuDNoTcH said:
lol size dont mean ****.. u aint moving the cfm then why have the biger intake??? bigger intake = bigger $$$$.... a BIG waste for combo that this thread is about..... hey Jared. you do what u want..but listening to these clowns will get you no where. but an empty wallet.
Click to expand...

I've got nothing to prove to you and I don't care to get involved in one of your dick-swinging pi ssing matches. My post was simply made to illustrate the significant difference between a GT40 lower and an aftermarket one.
 

DuDNoTcH

Member
Dec 22, 2009
82
2
9
Dec 23, 2012
#45
  • Dec 23, 2012
  • #45
this debate was about flow numbers. i already provided the info that all three intakes were in the same playing field. thanks for your chart. i was asking for ''FLOW #'' not dyno numbers.. i understand it got alittle out of hand. but seems sometimes u need someone to act like a dickhead to get a point across. no need for this guy jared hess to go out spend 500 bucks on a intake and pick up nothing over all.. not fair to him or anyone who doesn't know the difference and listens to this BS and goes out and spends the money..for what??...cause some EXPERT on the internet told him he would pick up hp?? 90% of everyone tellng this guy this BS all have EFI killers that run low 12's with 10 and 9sec parts in them... im sorry but i read some of these ppls profiles and its a joke. the truth hurts.. i am sorry if some of you cant handle it..seems the truth is an issue with society today... anyway like i said.. this debate comes down to.. no reason for a intake change. and there's no reason to listen to the guys making no HP.
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Dec 23, 2012
#46
  • Dec 23, 2012
  • #46
lets debate this, just had a car on the dyno 306 tfs heads. had a gt40 and swapped to a professional products. with no other changes the car picked up 18 rwhp.
BTW, DuDNoTch your sure your a grudge racer and not some keyboard jockey? Everyone else on this board doesn't have a problem laying there combo out there, except YOU.
 
Reactions: ratio411

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Dec 23, 2012
#47
  • Dec 23, 2012
  • #47
Jared, Nothing wrong with those heads either, just because they are a good deal doesn't mean they are not good. In testing with a tired stock 302 bottom end, procomp 190s and an x cam and a small nitrous hit, we made 445 rwhp, not to shabby if you ask me. We are putting those heads on a 351w in the next few weeks and are expecting to put a car in the 9's with them.
Back to your original question, in my opinion, even a professional products intake would be a step up, im not not crazy about that cobra intake.
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,482
8,678
234
S.I.NY
Dec 23, 2012
#48
  • Dec 23, 2012
  • #48
NIKwoaC said:
Here's a classic:

Click to expand...
That's the sheet I was referring to before .
 

Attachments

  • intake5.webp
    107 KB · Views: 84

MikeH686

Mine is only two inches though.
10 Year Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,843
1,753
184
Waldorf, MD
Dec 23, 2012
#49
  • Dec 23, 2012
  • #49
Oh dudnotch is looking for a race but if you go after him he says how his HONDA friends will love to wash you up oh and the green car he SOLD so the white one is his new car blah blah blah blah blah
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Dec 23, 2012
#50
  • Dec 23, 2012
  • #50
Tell him to bring it on. Something tells me my street car will hold its own.
 
Reactions: MikeH686

MikeH686

Mine is only two inches though.
10 Year Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,843
1,753
184
Waldorf, MD
Dec 23, 2012
#51
  • Dec 23, 2012
  • #51
Pretty mine will also and i am about half your car lmao
 

Jared Hess

Member
Dec 18, 2012
76
9
18
Six Mile Run, PA
Dec 24, 2012
#52
  • Dec 24, 2012
  • #52
84 ttop how much is a little hit and were they as cast or cnc i was praying for 400 at the wheels but figured id be disapointed when i actually got it to a dyno
 

Jared Hess

Member
Dec 18, 2012
76
9
18
Six Mile Run, PA
Dec 24, 2012
#53
  • Dec 24, 2012
  • #53
84Ttop said:
Jared, Nothing wrong with those heads either, just because they are a good deal doesn't mean they are not good. In testing with a tired stock 302 bottom end, procomp 190s and an x cam and a small nitrous hit, we made 445 rwhp, not to shabby if you ask me. We are putting those heads on a 351w in the next few weeks and are expecting to put a car in the 9's with them.
Back to your original question, in my opinion, even a professional products intake would be a step up, im not not crazy about that cobra intake.
Click to expand...
how much is a little hit and were they as cast or cnc i was praying for 400 at the wheels but figured id be disapointed when i actually got it to a dyno
 

Jared Hess

Member
Dec 18, 2012
76
9
18
Six Mile Run, PA
Dec 24, 2012
#54
  • Dec 24, 2012
  • #54
srry for the double post i'm just figuring this out
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Dec 24, 2012
#55
  • Dec 24, 2012
  • #55
I'm pretty sure it was a 67 nitrous jet, like a 175 shot. They are the as cast heads by the way. We are going to put those same heads on a 351 and hit it with a 250 or so and see what they can do. The flow numbers out of the box are good. You should make 400 rwhp with a 150 easy. Let me know if you need help with the setup I can walk you through it.
 

blackfive-o

Member
Apr 23, 2012
29
2
14
Dec 25, 2012
#56
  • Dec 25, 2012
  • #56
I run the GT40 tubular and wouldn't have anything else simply because it looks so bad ass!
 

Jared Hess

Member
Dec 18, 2012
76
9
18
Six Mile Run, PA
Dec 25, 2012
#57
  • Dec 25, 2012
  • #57
lol i agree it does look good
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Digital Tuning Going heads/cam/intake. Do I need a tune?
  • karhoot
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
476
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 14, 2026
karhoot
K
H
turbo advice
  • hawkinsdrag
  • May 5, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
440
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2025
hoopty5.0
S
Holley High-ram tuning settings
  • spencergt66
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
525
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jun 19, 2026
spencergt66
S
D
Tune erased/wont start/91 fox body
  • drew123
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
1
Views
77
Digital Self-tuning Forum Sunday at 1:11 PM
CAMTWO1070
C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
369
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?