• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum

New size tires for my '01 Cobra? Need opinions.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ganton
  • Start date Start date Apr 4, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Bobbys97R

New Member
Sep 6, 2004
224
0
0
Lakewood
Apr 6, 2005
#21
  • Apr 6, 2005
  • #21
I have 275 40 17 on the back and Im running sportline springs
 

Bobbys97R

New Member
Sep 6, 2004
224
0
0
Lakewood
Apr 6, 2005
#22
  • Apr 6, 2005
  • #22
these were 12" wide and way to tall LOL
 

TXSnakeCharmer

Founding Member
Jul 16, 2001
1,582
0
36
DFW Texas
Apr 7, 2005
#23
  • Apr 7, 2005
  • #23
There are alot of tires out there at 255x40. I wasnt aware of any major diameter differences between tires of varying widths. The overall diameter difference between Kumho 245 and 255 is .3" which isnt much and would have little affect on the speedo. Now regarding profile of the tire, the over all difference between Kumho 245x40 and 245x45 is 1.1" which would affect the speedo. Either way I program my own EEC using SCT according to the exact tire sizes I am running so it doesnt affect me at all.

hersheyman said:
I didn't think that anyone made a 255/40, only a 255/45. Either way changing to a 255 will throw off your speedo a little, so just be aware. I just purchased new wheels and rear tires for my 97 a couple weeks ago. I kept the 245s up front cause I think they fill the well fine and don't mess up the speedo. But I put real meat out back on 10.5" wheels. Check it out.
Click to expand...
 

Ganton

Founding Member
Jul 4, 2000
150
0
17
Olympia, Wash. USA
Apr 8, 2005
#24
  • Apr 8, 2005
  • #24
Got em on there.

Okay, I went and did it. 255/40s up front and 275/40s out back on the stock 17 inch rims. Like one of you said, above, there is more sidewall bulge with the 275s on the stock 17" rims, but it doesn't look that bad to me at all---maybe it's the sidewall design of these tires that minimizes it? They're Falken ziex ZE 326s, probably not up to a lot of the tires seen on this forum, but the price was right and they got a high speed rating, VR or maybe ZR, dunno for sure, will have to look. They are a good looking performance tire, and look a lot like the ones on SnakeCharmer's convert. in profile and design. I'm a little disappointed in that the 255/40s up front increased the wheel well gap somewhat from the 245/45s, but the big 275s in the rear fill it up good. Seems like the car has a bit more quickness on initial acceleration, maybe due to the the wider rubber in the back, or is that just my imagination and wishful thinking?? Overall, I'm real happy with the ride and improved handling.
 

TXSnakeCharmer

Founding Member
Jul 16, 2001
1,582
0
36
DFW Texas
Apr 8, 2005
#25
  • Apr 8, 2005
  • #25
Ganton, congrats. an FYI, as I noted above about the .7" difference in diameter between 255 and 275, if you use a chip or other to compensate for the speedo base the chip settings off the rear 275's. That is where the EEC reads from regarding the speedo calculations.
 

jmk97GT

Member
Oct 29, 2004
178
0
16
Apr 8, 2005
#26
  • Apr 8, 2005
  • #26
Cant really help you with pics of the car, since mines a 97, but heres a little comparasin between a 245 and a 275:

View attachment 517879
Yokohamas on the left (245) and NT555s on the right (275)
 

Ganton

Founding Member
Jul 4, 2000
150
0
17
Olympia, Wash. USA
Apr 10, 2005
#27
  • Apr 10, 2005
  • #27
They're ZR rated, and I got a pretty durned good buy, methinks...

Ganton said:
Okay, I went and did it. 255/40s up front and 275/40s out back on the stock 17 inch rims. Like one of you said, above, there is more sidewall bulge with the 275s on the stock 17" rims, but it doesn't look that bad to me at all---maybe it's the sidewall design of these tires that minimizes it? They're Falken ziex ZE 326s, probably not up to a lot of the tires seen on this forum, but the price was right and they got a high speed rating, VR or maybe ZR, dunno for sure, will have to look. They are a good looking performance tire, and look a lot like the ones on SnakeCharmer's convert. in profile and design. I'm a little disappointed in that the 255/40s up front increased the wheel well gap somewhat from the 245/45s, but the big 275s in the rear fill it up good. Seems like the car has a bit more quickness on initial acceleration, maybe due to the the wider rubber in the back, or is that just my imagination and wishful thinking?? Overall, I'm real happy with the ride and improved handling.
Click to expand...

Just thought I'd add as a closing post in this thread that these new Falken ZIEX's are ZR speed rated. Also, the 255/40s were $127.13 a piece and the 275/40s were $158.98 for a total "out-the-door" mounted, stems, spin balanced, and state sales tax of 8% of $663.65 (they happened to be "on sale"), which I thought was a pretty durned good buy from a "brick 'n mortar" tire, brakes, suspension chain store rather than a magazine or online "tire rack outlet."
 

cobrahissss

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
37
0
0
Seneca, SC
Oct 10, 2005
#28
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #28
I put 275/40 on the stock 8 inch rims on the front and 255/50R17 on the rear which are 1.4 inches taller than the 275's with 1 inch spacers and lowered 1.5 inches. This puts gives the car that ol muscle car rake and fills the wheel wells.
 

tfritz

Founding Member
Sep 27, 2001
886
1
0
SoCal
Oct 11, 2005
#29
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #29
I'm 245X17 in front and 275X17 in back. Sits pretty good IMO.

 
J

Judson_99Cobra

New Member
Feb 3, 2003
18
0
0
Warner Robins, GA
Oct 15, 2005
#30
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #30
tt
 

COBRA90GT

Mustang Master
Sep 22, 2001
6,654
0
87
HOCKEYTOWN ® , MI
Oct 15, 2005
#31
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #31
Holy old thread resurrection Batman.
 

tfritz

Founding Member
Sep 27, 2001
886
1
0
SoCal
Oct 18, 2005
#32
  • Oct 18, 2005
  • #32
lol. I just replied to the post as they pop up on my recent views. Never took the time to look at the beginning date of the thread. lol 6 months later.
 
C

coreseller

New Member
Feb 1, 2004
18
0
0
Oct 19, 2005
#33
  • Oct 19, 2005
  • #33
18" X 9" front wheels, 265/35
18" X 10" rear wheels, 285/35
What I would do next time:
17" X 8" front wheels, 255/40
17" X 10.5 rear wheels, 285/40
Why? too harsh of a ride and tracking from the front, it sure looks bitchin though.
BTW Eibach ProKit also on mine
 

cobrahissss

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
37
0
0
Seneca, SC
Jan 6, 2006
#34
  • Jan 6, 2006
  • #34
I have pictures on SVT Talk with 255/50R17 tires on the rear (27.1 inches diam) with 275/40R17 fronts that are 25.7 diam. Car has H&R springs lowered 1.5". See item relating to Stance with rear tall tire.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

What's it Worth? 2000 GT
  • Mustang5L5
  • May 8, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
6
Views
327
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 13, 2026
KRUISR
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
527
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 6, 2026
85GT4V
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
D
Need help with suspension, wheel + tire size, 91 Fox SN95 5 Lug
  • DHatton
  • Jun 9, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2022
nickyb
  • Locked
How much lower does the convertible sit? Debating lowering my car but.....
  • 5ltr7up
  • Mar 29, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 30, 2022
mikestang63
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?