• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Nothing positive about the GT-40 Intake?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sodaking663rd
  • Start date Start date Jul 27, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

sodaking663rd

New Member
Oct 11, 2004
47
0
0
annapolis, md
Jul 27, 2006
#1
  • Jul 27, 2006
  • #1
I have been reading many threads on intake manifolds and it is rare to see the GT-40 intake even mentioned. Some have said the cobra and GT-40 run out of breath early and this has me concerned that my intake (GT-40) is not going to be able to handle a lightly supercharged application. All the rage seems to be for the Trick Flow intake recently. Can someone confirm what I've been reading? Is the GT-40 intake just not up to snuff with some of the newer ones? It'd be hard to get rid of because I just love the way it looks. Thanks!
 
1

1SLO306

My 97 GTP owns you ALL!
Mar 31, 2005
904
1
17
Muhlenberg, ky
Jul 27, 2006
#2
  • Jul 27, 2006
  • #2
i dont think a lil boost will do that maybe 5psi. u can always have the think port if u still want to keep the gt40
 

Mavrick

Founding Member
Aug 29, 2002
2,264
0
46
Collingwood, ON
Jul 27, 2006
#3
  • Jul 27, 2006
  • #3
It's old technology, but it still works great for what it is. It'll work awesome with a blower.
 
S

snoboardcore

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
276
0
0
New Hampshire
Jul 27, 2006
#4
  • Jul 27, 2006
  • #4
Im running 12lbs of boost through mine unported and im able to make 473rwhp with it so i would keep it.
 

sodaking663rd

New Member
Oct 11, 2004
47
0
0
annapolis, md
Jul 27, 2006
#5
  • Jul 27, 2006
  • #5
snoboardcore said:
Im running 12lbs of boost through mine unported and im able to make 473rwhp with it so i would keep it.
Click to expand...
excellent. thanks!
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Jul 27, 2006
#6
  • Jul 27, 2006
  • #6
gt-40 is a great intake!
 

Ozz

I think I have a problem here.
Founding Member
Jul 27, 2001
3,514
66
109
Canton, MI
Jul 27, 2006
#7
  • Jul 27, 2006
  • #7
snoboardcore said:
Im running 12lbs of boost through mine unported and im able to make 473rwhp with it so i would keep it.
Click to expand...

:OT: What size blower pulleys are you running?
 

Tonys96Cobra

professional deer "mounter"
Oct 28, 2005
19
9
29
Syracuse
Jul 27, 2006
#8
  • Jul 27, 2006
  • #8
Its a piece of crap. I will buy it for $100 and you will like it!
 

bubba-dough

Active Member
Dec 28, 2004
1,044
2
38
Indiana
Jul 28, 2006
#9
  • Jul 28, 2006
  • #9
My pal is running one with a boosted 302 and hitting 368 rwhp and 392 ft/lbs. I am running an explorer and running low 12's with a 2.36 60'.....keep it unless you have the $$ to toss around.
 

stang8urimport

Autozone Junkie
Founding Member
Jun 21, 2002
1,499
12
59
Daytona Beach, FL
Jul 28, 2006
#10
  • Jul 28, 2006
  • #10
I love my GT-40 intake. Old school and arguable the best looking intake made. My lower is ported... it made a little difference then stock... Looks so pretty too
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Jul 28, 2006
#11
  • Jul 28, 2006
  • #11
Its a decent inatke, then again anything is better then our stock lowers, it will be a nice jump from stock, will work great for low end torque on mostly stock motor because of the long runners, Its a good intake for a budget build but not the best choice for a good hci setup.
 
S

snoboardcore

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
276
0
0
New Hampshire
Jul 28, 2006
#12
  • Jul 28, 2006
  • #12
mansonozz said:
:OT: What size blower pulleys are you running?
Click to expand...

Im Running the 3.33 on the blower and 7 on the crank
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Jul 28, 2006
#13
  • Jul 28, 2006
  • #13
GT40 is a great intake. Its great for a stock engine and porting shows really good gains when more goodies can use it. I think a lot of people don't opt for it because its expensive to begin with and to be optimal you would have to port it which is another added expense. The holley seems to be a popular option for the supercharged croud.
Kevin
 

1bad89lx

Member
Feb 24, 2003
134
0
17
Angola, IN
Aug 22, 2006
#14
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #14
How much hp can you expect when adding a gt40 intake to an otherwise stock (basic bolt on) mustang?
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Aug 22, 2006
#15
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #15
not a ton, the heads can't handle much more flow. The $500 is better spent on gears or control arms until you're ready to head up.

Find an explorer intake for under $200 if you're still running e7's, that will make the bang for buck a little more reasonable.
 

1bad89lx

Member
Feb 24, 2003
134
0
17
Angola, IN
Aug 22, 2006
#16
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #16
What's the difference between an Explorer and a GT40 intake?
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Aug 22, 2006
#17
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #17
lowers are the same (gt40), uppers are different. A little more restrictive, but not by enough to really make much of a difference at all.

mid to late 97-2001 don't have egr provisions, if you have to run egr, grab a 96/early 97 piece.
 

just4bob50

Active Member
Apr 2, 2005
504
5
28
Pa.
Aug 22, 2006
#18
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #18
I love the way my GT-40 looks and at 5000 rpms with 10psi and the stock heads Im making 368 hp, and 421 tq at 4000 rpms. My problem is the stock heads bottle necking. I know that when I get better heads the intake may become the weak link, but nothing looks cooler in my opinion. Like a header for your intake.
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Aug 22, 2006
#19
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #19
I have always loved the Tubular Look of the GT40 Intake!
 

RBRANDX

New Member
Mar 10, 2006
110
0
0
Myrtle Beach, SC
Aug 22, 2006
#20
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #20
I too am running a gt-40 on a supercharged engine, It was one of the first upgrades I did to the car and because it has worked so well for me on so many different combos I have kept it all of these years ( the good looks are a plus as well!). However with my current setup it is definatley holding me back...My point is that the gt-40 is a great all around intake and will work WELL in most situations, but it is not a standout performer especally once you hit about the 400hp mark.

BTW...I will trade my gt-40 for any interesting offers ( holley systemax, Trick flow R , or any other race parts)
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Resolved 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
664
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Friday at 12:37 PM
fasterthangas
F
P
New member with 98
  • Poster
  • Apr 28, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
430
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 8, 2025
Poster
P
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
455
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
888
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
727
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?