• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Official Yay or Nay thread, with 2 awesome chops!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95Vert
  • Start date Start date Dec 5, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Dec 5, 2005
#1
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #1
RED


or BLACK
 

stprorolla49

Active Member
Oct 9, 2004
1,455
15
39
Fairfield, CT/North Jersey
Dec 5, 2005
#2
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #2
red for sure man....but im partial
 

stanglvrsgrl

New Member
Apr 12, 2005
16
0
0
Connelly Springs NC
Dec 5, 2005
#3
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #3
red
 

BlueOvalStangGT

Active Member
Oct 27, 2003
2,849
0
46
Tampa Florida....USF!!!
Dec 5, 2005
#4
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #4
Ummmm this isnt worthy of a thread, the obvious answer is black.
 

stanglvrsgrl

New Member
Apr 12, 2005
16
0
0
Connelly Springs NC
Dec 5, 2005
#5
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #5
actually the more I look at them its catch 22 i like them both black looks better when its shined up and clean but red is more catchy
 

1994Vib.RedGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
585
0
16
Denver, CO
Dec 5, 2005
#6
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #6
I dunno, despite loving my red stang, a good shiny black one always makes me drool
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Dec 5, 2005
#7
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #7
red
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Dec 5, 2005
#8
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #8
black looks awesome when it is clean, and terrible when it is dirty.

mine is dirty much more than it is clean, so it doesn't look good very often.

if you have the time and energy to keep it clean, then black, otherwise red.

not pic-whoring but your combo looks similar to mine, with a different hood and black instead of silver fr-500s

here's mine clean:


and dirty:
 

Attachments

  • DSCF0486.webp
    77.4 KB · Views: 120
  • dirt_0003.webp
    250.8 KB · Views: 133

87_GT

Member
Sep 14, 2004
179
2
18
tinley park, illinois
Dec 5, 2005
#9
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #9
i vote red
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Dec 5, 2005
#10
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #10
black--but i'm biased
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Dec 5, 2005
#11
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #11
Black

And no car looks good when its dirty...so why not go with the one that looks BEST when clean?
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Dec 5, 2005
#12
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #12
nmcgrawj said:
Black

And no car looks good when its dirty
Click to expand...
:Word:
 

sade04

Member
Sep 13, 2004
97
0
6
Lansdale, PA
Dec 5, 2005
#13
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #13
black
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
Dec 5, 2005
#14
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #14
black
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Dec 5, 2005
#15
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #15
Orange




Seriously tho, Im kinda partial to red, but black is sexy.....I don't know, I might have to with black here...either way it'll look badass
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Dec 5, 2005
#16
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #16
nmcgrawj said:
And no car looks good when its dirty...
Click to expand...
yeah, but some look much worse than others when they are dirty. a dirty silver car doesn't look nearly as bad as a dirty black one.
 

WhiteStallionGT

Member
Aug 19, 2004
465
0
17
Northern VA / VT
Dec 5, 2005
#17
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #17
I'm going to have to say RED on this one. Red verts look hotter.
 

WHITE94COBRA

New Member
Nov 14, 2003
816
0
0
HUNTINGTON BEACH
Dec 5, 2005
#18
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #18
Ummmmmm.............. White!!!!!!!!!!





Ok not one of the options..........hmmmmmm..............
Half and half Bottom black and top red.........
Otherwise BLACK only.......
 

ES Stangin

New Member
Apr 6, 2005
132
0
0
Erie, Pa
Dec 5, 2005
#19
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #19
I think black stangs are sexy.. but with the pics the red one looks better
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Dec 5, 2005
#20
  • Dec 5, 2005
  • #20

 

Attachments

  • MWSEMA456_JPG.webp
    34.1 KB · Views: 118
  • MWSEMA454_JPG.webp
    28.4 KB · Views: 113
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Build thread. Project Problem child. 1967 Coupe.
  • billison
  • Sep 16, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
970
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 31, 2025
billison
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
Progress Thread Nicholase "lights out" build-
  • nicholase
  • Aug 10, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 26 27 28
Replies
548
Views
39K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 10, 2026
nicholase
G
1965 Mustang Fastback for future project & sand blasting discussion. Anyone welcome to input
  • GOvert
  • Feb 28, 2024
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
4K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Mar 24, 2024
horse sence
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?