• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

ORIGINAL FORD TOOLING SHEET METAL

  • Thread starter Thread starter danny clemens
  • Start date Start date Apr 3, 2007
D

danny clemens

Member
May 4, 2005
728
0
16
Apr 3, 2007
#1
  • Apr 3, 2007
  • #1
I purchased two fenders and a hood made with the original Ford tooling for my 66 FB. I feel fairly confident that they will fit better than the other fenders and hoods that can be bought. I checked the finish and found one fairly large outboard and several other ripples and flaws. I know I can fix the defects but was wondering what everybody else thought about the Ford tooling panels. I work at a place that stamps and assembles body parts for Ford, Mercedes, Chrysler and BMW. If we sent parts out that had the quality of these Ford tooling panels they would be sent back and the customer would be very upset. I saw a front end clip made of these parts at the 40th Anniversary show outside of Nashville. My parts would take quite a bit of work to look as good as those did. These parts aren't cheap and I just thought that they should be better than they are.
 

CraigMBA

New Member
Mar 24, 2007
783
1
0
Orange, CA
Apr 3, 2007
#2
  • Apr 3, 2007
  • #2
You're not wrong. You have to rework the Ford restamps too.

They are WAY BETTER than the import options.
 
H

Helmantel

New Member
Aug 9, 2006
206
1
0
Apr 4, 2007
#3
  • Apr 4, 2007
  • #3
If your company would produce sheet metal similar in quality of what Ford produced back in the sixties, customers would probably complain too. Since tooling tends to wear out, the quality of the new "Original Tooling" parts may be worse compared to what they made in the sixties.

I like quality as much as anybody else, but on the other hand, we're really quite spoiled with all the Mustang parts available for very reasonable prices, even if the quality may not always be perfect.
 

NasaGT

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
1,993
2
49
Virginia
Apr 4, 2007
#4
  • Apr 4, 2007
  • #4
I just straightened some ripples and minor tooling flaws on a stock 69 fender. I always thought the Ford tooling parts would have some of the same flaws.
 
L

lauras70mach1

Member
Aug 1, 2004
202
0
17
minnesota
Apr 4, 2007
#5
  • Apr 4, 2007
  • #5
Try fitting one of those repop door shells onto your car.
 

65FBE2

Member
Mar 8, 2007
283
0
17
Minnasnowta
Apr 4, 2007
#6
  • Apr 4, 2007
  • #6
I can only speak for the front fenders, but I called Tony Branda Inc. and asked if it was worth the extra money for the Ford tooling fenders and they said only if you are doing a concourse resto. I bought the import fenders from them and was very happy! I do not know how many different import manufacturer there are so all the imports may not be the same. I spent 10's of thousands (code just to keep the wife at bay) on the body on my car and would not have gone cheap on the fenders with out a reliable reference. Even the restration shop that did the body work was amazed at the fit as they see alot of poor quaility panels in thier business
 
D

danny clemens

Member
May 4, 2005
728
0
16
Apr 4, 2007
#7
  • Apr 4, 2007
  • #7
Helmantel said:
Since tooling tends to wear out, the quality of the new "Original Tooling" parts may be worse compared to what they made in the sixties.
Click to expand...

The dies do wear because you can sometimes tell the difference from one press run to another. The company that I work for has tooling people that work on the dies whenever necessary. They can fix a flaw and make a part better. The people that own the Mustang tooling could do the same. A low production process like the Mustang parts shouldn't wear a die very quickly. Maybe I expected too much. The reason that I ordered these panels is because about 10 or 12 years ago I bought some of the Tawain sheetmetal for my son's car and it wasn't very good. Especially the fenders. It sounds as though the other panels have improved in quality.
 
S

stang66myway2

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
22
0
0
Apr 4, 2007
#8
  • Apr 4, 2007
  • #8
i just purchased a pair of the orig ford tooling fenders from laural mountain mustang and i am very pleased with them i do have to tweak the upper corner near the windshield post but other then that i am very pleased with them . i also have purchased the cheap aftermarkets and the fit and thickness was terrible.
 

BIG-MAC

New Member
Jan 22, 2006
82
0
0
Dallas
Apr 4, 2007
#9
  • Apr 4, 2007
  • #9
I bought NOS right front fender and trunk lid when I painted my car and they required some work for an acceptable fit.
 
6

68RCodeConv

New Member
Oct 2, 2003
345
0
0
Houston, TX
Apr 5, 2007
#10
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #10
The original Ford tooling fender I bought for my 68 was just as good as the NOS fender on the other side.
 
D

danny clemens

Member
May 4, 2005
728
0
16
Apr 5, 2007
#11
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #11
Maybe I'm just spoiled from looking at the quality of work that we put out where I work and it's far from perfect.
 
R

Red5oh

Member
Jul 8, 2005
377
0
17
DFW, Texas
Apr 6, 2007
#12
  • Apr 6, 2007
  • #12
I bought a set for my 67 and they fit like a glove. NO rework, NO issues, NO anything.... worth every penny. I caused the only ding by dropping something on them.
 
J

James Kirk

New Member
Jun 3, 2005
44
0
0
Apr 6, 2007
#13
  • Apr 6, 2007
  • #13
Just keep in mind that quality was on the back burner in the 60's,70's and 80's.
A NOS brand new Ford ford fender stamped back in the day still won' t have the fit and finish of todays parts. That attitude combined with high fuel consumption is what opened the doors for imports.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
G
1983 GLX Convertible 5.0 5-Speed 4BBL 'Barn Find' - 82,000 original miles - Restoration Motivation Needed
  • Grande Luxe X-Factor
  • Oct 7, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 31, 2024
Mac131
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
Avoid --> BLUEOVALINDUSTRIES.com and this Ford part# VJR3Z-16C630-D. Read Below.........
  • monte87
  • Feb 1, 2022
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
17
Views
4K
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk May 6, 2022
cdog301
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?