• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Panhandle Performance

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95Vert383AOD
  • Start date Start date Jun 20, 2009

95Vert383AOD

15 Year Member
Jun 10, 2008
1,133
34
69
New Bedford, MA
Jun 20, 2009
#1
  • Jun 20, 2009
  • #1
They're out of Florida. Anyone here use them? Looking at the site and i like their prices and flow numbers. For the $2000ish mark it almost makes me contemplate getting a set of Victors.

Panhandle Performance - Cylinder Heads
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jun 21, 2009
#2
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #2
A local guy had a panhandle 331 combo that ran very well for years, but I don't remember what parts he had in it.

As for victors... they are old school and without a lot of port work they aren't worth looking at IMO. Although when ported the flow numbers look good, the design of their port and the size at which it must be opened up to in order to get those high numbers makes for one lazy airflow port. There are better offerings out there. Don't get hung up only on flow numbers as there is more to making a powerful and efficient NA setup than strictly looking at them. Velocity, chamber design, port volume and shape, etc all play a huge roll in making one head/one combo outperform another.
 

95Vert383AOD

15 Year Member
Jun 10, 2008
1,133
34
69
New Bedford, MA
Jun 21, 2009
#3
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #3
I wonder if they can port my Pro comps.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jun 21, 2009
#4
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #4
95Vert383AOD said:
I wonder if they can port my Pro comps.
Click to expand...

Let me ask you this... are they really worth porting? I don't mean that as a crude statement but I've seen those heads and although they were an attempt at a cast copy of an AFR 185 they were a poor execution of it. Some of the pics I've seen on the net of their ports and machining would have me running from them... not wanting to sink more cash into them. Can they be made better with porting? I'm sure they can but to what point I don't know. I only know that you are not starting off with much of an advantage to start with so I'd assume a lot of work and money would go into making them perform to a point that would make your combo, and ultimately you happy.

I truely believe that when it comes to heads, you get what you pay for. In a combo such as yours a killer set of heads would make all of the difference in the world if they were choosen for the right reasons, price not being one of them.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Jun 21, 2009
#5
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #5
I think Paul is spot on here. Don't get excited about the flow numbers. Don't waste any more money on those Pro Comps.

Kurt
 

nunly94gt

Founding Member
Feb 3, 2002
1,595
3
38
Mobile, Al
Jun 21, 2009
#6
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #6
Ive seen guys running around locally with there sticker on the car. They all seem to be decent setups.

I agree with killer on the victors, ported they are very good, stock not so much. There are to many good heads out there that flow way better than Edelbrocks.
 

95Vert383AOD

15 Year Member
Jun 10, 2008
1,133
34
69
New Bedford, MA
Jun 21, 2009
#7
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #7
Yeah oddly the Casting of the Procomps i have aren't that bad. The ports and finish looked like the Twisted wedge heads i had.
Pro Comp 210cc Flow numbers off their site.
.200 101.5 -91.1
.300 146.7 -131.0
.400 194.1 -160.0
.500 233.4 -170.3
.600 255.8 -173.8
.700 262.0 -177.0

I would need 75 cfm more on the intake port to make it AFR comparable. Same with the Exhaust. They're O-Ringed too.... Wonder who would buy em. Bet they would make a good 331 head with some boost.
 

Black Stampede

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,811
2
39
Grand Rapids, MI
Jun 21, 2009
#8
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #8
I am sure you know this all too well at this point, but this a perfect example of why people gotta do lots of research before sinking money into a setup. I am not trying to slam you at all man, but for others in the future its just very helpful.
 

95Vert383AOD

15 Year Member
Jun 10, 2008
1,133
34
69
New Bedford, MA
Jun 21, 2009
#9
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #9
Black Stampede said:
I am sure you know this all too well at this point, but this a perfect example of why people gotta do lots of research before sinking money into a setup. I am not trying to slam you at all man, but for others in the future its just very helpful.
Click to expand...

Yeah i know...well after building the bottom end and buying Trickflow R parts the budget was strained. I figured all heads that were 200cc where close. Unfortunately i built the engine before joining a mustang forum. If i would have had stangnet i would be buying boost parts now instead of buying go fast parts 2wice.

But i have :SNSign:

Thanks to you guys i'm back on the right path.

Chris
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jun 21, 2009
#10
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #10
Yea Paul, you mean like these pro-comps?



vs AFR...



I would agree with you.

Pro-comps suck. I dont care what flow #'s they claim. My car was 100rwhp DOWN with them on vs the 205's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
643
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
366
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
S
Suspension Spring I.D. help?
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
170
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 21, 2025
Scott_S
S
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
189
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
S
Timing chain, guides and tensioner installation (Possible orientation in Intake Stroke)
  • StallionMax
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
352
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2025
StallionMax
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?