• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Pics of 17X10 on 65 fastback

  • Thread starter Thread starter iskwezm
  • Start date Start date Oct 15, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
54
Rowland Heights,California
Oct 15, 2006
#1
  • Oct 15, 2006
  • #1
I went to a show this past weekend in Bakersfield and saw this light blue fastback that i say a add a year ago and the owner stated he has 17X10' AR TT2's with 275/40's. I didnt think it was possible, but heres the pics. He said he used a axle out of a 71' Mach 1 ( i think) which is a 1/2 wider and with disc brakes adds another 3/8". The wheels are made for a 93' foxbody, but he didnt know the specs. Theres minor rubbing(no worse then mine), but tires had a huge footprint.
View attachment 432674
View attachment 432676
(on a weird angle)
View attachment 432678

and my car and my brothers bug.
View attachment 432680

my new blower tube( i cut too short and need to re make )
View attachment 432682
 

69fastback393

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
48
0
0
ocean isle beach n.c.
Oct 16, 2006
#2
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #2
that looks like a 17 x 9.5 !
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
54
Rowland Heights,California
Oct 16, 2006
#3
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #3
he swears its a 10". It looked wider in person
 

2bav8

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1998
2,511
1
47
59
Mesa, AZ
www.geocities.com
Oct 16, 2006
#4
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #4
American Racing makes the AR TT2's in 17x9.5"
10" wide rims is not an option according to their website.
 
J

justinhip

New Member
Apr 20, 2006
16
0
1
Oct 16, 2006
#5
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #5
Why does it seem as though the tire sticks out on the passenger side and sits right on the driver side?
 

2bav8

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1998
2,511
1
47
59
Mesa, AZ
www.geocities.com
Oct 16, 2006
#6
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #6
Why does it seem as though the tire sticks out on the passenger side and sits right on the driver side?
Click to expand...
Because quality control wasn't the best in 1965.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
53
Queen Creek Arizona
streetfire.net
Oct 16, 2006
#7
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #7
Thats pretty much how mine looks also with 17x9.5's on the rear.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
54
Rowland Heights,California
Oct 16, 2006
#8
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #8
justinhip said:
Why does it seem as though the tire sticks out on the passenger side and sits right on the driver side?
Click to expand...
It has air shocks in the rear but was on a incline. It sat straight when he drove in.

American Racing makes the AR TT2's in 17x9.5"
10" wide rims is not an option according to their website.
Click to expand...
your right .they make a 9.5 or a 10.5. I looked under the car and there was still about 3/8" next to the leafs.Hmmm, he passed it off as 10" wheels all weekend.
 

65notch

New Member
Jun 18, 2005
303
0
0
42
661 Cali
Oct 16, 2006
#9
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #9
i know this guy pretty well. we attend the same fri night show every week... the spot he is parked in dips down about midway down his car. the tire on the driver side is actually suck higher than usual causing the pass. side to drop down. he has to keep the rear shocks aired up to keep the tires from rubbing in dips
 
R

rc4mike

Member
Oct 10, 2006
142
0
16
Oct 16, 2006
#10
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #10
whhels

I have 18x9 on the rear and 17x8 up front on my 65 GT convertible. Used a 1" lowering kit and have no problems with rubbing. Wheels were custom made by American Racing

mike
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
54
Rowland Heights,California
Oct 17, 2006
#11
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #11
rc4mike said:
I have 18x9 on the rear and 17x8 up front on my 65 GT convertible. Used a 1" lowering kit and have no problems with rubbing. Wheels were custom made by American Racing

mike
Click to expand...
any pics
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Oct 17, 2006
#12
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #12
The logic of using the 2" wider rearend, adding an inch to backspace would give this result. I'm assuming the rear fender lips are rolled and the inner wheelhouses are notched. This tire would sit about 1/2" of an inch from the leaf and about 1/4" from the inside of the front inner wheelhouse which is too close without notching! The out will rub a little but it looks like he has it lifted. Panhard is bar highly recommended!
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
54
Rowland Heights,California
Oct 17, 2006
#13
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #13
mdjay said:
The logic of using the 2" wider rearend, adding an inch to backspace would give this result. I'm assuming the rear fender lips are rolled and the inner wheelhouses are notched. This tire would sit about 1/2" of an inch from the leaf and about 1/4" from the inside of the front inner wheelhouse which is too close without notching! The out will rub a little but it looks like he has it lifted. Panhard is bar highly recommended!
Click to expand...
He did no t roll the lips( i checked) and the inner is not touched either(so he says)
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
53
Cecil County, MD
www.dodgestang.com
Oct 17, 2006
#14
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #14
Well....you wouldn't need to roll the lips when using air shocks pumped up like has been reported in this thread thereby preventing the suspension from actually working and keeping the rear artificially elevated adding high stress to a sheet metal mount point.
 
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Oct 17, 2006
#15
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #15
dodgestang said:
Well....you wouldn't need to roll the lips when using air shocks pumped up like has been reported in this thread thereby preventing the suspension from actually working and keeping the rear artificially elevated adding high stress to a sheet metal mount point.
Click to expand...
Hey, ya wanna have a chassis that works and doesn't destroy your unibody, or ya wanna look good?
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
54
Rowland Heights,California
Oct 17, 2006
#16
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #16
i know poeple keep looking at the pic and seeing the way the car sits with the back end all high but if you look at the first pic where the fender lip is just above the tire is the way the car sits,it wasnt as high as it looks.
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Oct 17, 2006
#17
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #17
iskwezm said:
He did no t roll the lips( i checked) and the inner is not touched either(so he says)
Click to expand...

I can see a little rub on the tires from the wheel lips.

I think these are 9" rims because of the way the tire is sitting relational to the rim. I know what fits in there and I can't say the 10 would make it without moving those inner wheelhouses then the leafs are right there too close for comfort!

I'm just now going to move to the 10 wide rim with either a 5.75 or 6" BS since we just did the TCP rear CO. Haven't got under there and measured yet but the 305 NT01 rr slick is going on it at that point Not in a hurry but it's in the near future!
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
53
Cecil County, MD
www.dodgestang.com
Oct 17, 2006
#18
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #18
iskwezm said:
i know poeple keep looking at the pic and seeing the way the car sits with the back end all high but if you look at the first pic where the fender lip is just above the tire is the way the car sits,it wasnt as high as it looks.
Click to expand...

I didn't mean to make it sound like I was implying the rear was 'jacked' up. Just artificially held higher than it should be when the suspension is attempting to go through up and down motions to cushion the ride.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
54
Rowland Heights,California
Oct 17, 2006
#19
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #19
mdjay said:
I can see a little rub on the tires from the wheel lips.

I think these are 9" rims because of the way the tire is sitting relational to the rim. I know what fits in there and I can't say the 10 would make it without moving those inner wheelhouses then the leafs are right there too close for comfort!

I'm just now going to move to the 10 wide rim with either a 5.75 or 6" BS since we just did the TCP rear CO. Haven't got under there and measured yet but the 305 NT01 rr slick is going on it at that point Not in a hurry but it's in the near future!
Click to expand...
thats what i figured, because i remember we talked at Knotts and i was taking mental notes, and yes there was a little rub.

The whole point of this thread was if it possible to stuff a 10" wheel in there WITHOUT any major cutting.
 

RMODEL65

Member
Jul 6, 2005
313
1
18
43
brunswick ga
Oct 17, 2006
#20
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #20
65notch said:
i know this guy pretty well. we attend the same fri night show every week... the spot he is parked in dips down about midway down his car. the tire on the driver side is actually suck higher than usual causing the pass. side to drop down. he has to keep the rear shocks aired up to keep the tires from rubbing in dips
Click to expand...


hes gonna be pissed when his air shocks ruin the rear floor in his fastback! they will eventually punch a hole thru the floor
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
417
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
Tire Fitment, With Pictures. Post your 10.5 wheel/tire combos
  • 89GTRound2
  • Mar 17, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 15, 2024
ThinBlue502
Family owned 1966 C-code Fastback soon to be out for restoration. PICS ADDED!
  • VOORHEES
  • Mar 13, 2019
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2021
65-Fstbk
  • Locked
I need some G78-14s Chuck....Chuck...G78-14s...Chuck???
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Aug 11, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 11, 2019
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?