• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Pics of BBK chrome shortys

  • Thread starter Thread starter 007
  • Start date Start date Apr 30, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
Apr 30, 2005
#1
  • Apr 30, 2005
  • #1
Here are a few pics of the chrome BBK tuned length shortys for anyone that cares. I paid 270 for them - not bad for a cheap mod IMO. I might get before and after dynos - I havent seen a convincing test yet.



 

1low03gt

20+ Year Stangneter
May 24, 2004
708
11
38
Cold Hell,Ontario,Canada!!
Apr 30, 2005
#2
  • Apr 30, 2005
  • #2
They look niceeeee!
Keep an up date on dyno #'s.
 
M

mto gt2000

New Member
Apr 8, 2005
69
0
0
Apr 30, 2005
#3
  • Apr 30, 2005
  • #3
In the the current issue of mmff they put ford racing shortys on and gained 4-5 hp.
 
T

tomabram

Banned
Apr 1, 2005
66
0
0
Apr 30, 2005
#4
  • Apr 30, 2005
  • #4
They are nice but the drawback on chrome is that they will rust. Price was ok, not great. I can get BBK ceramic coated equal length shorties for $250 delivered.
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Apr 30, 2005
#5
  • Apr 30, 2005
  • #5
Congrats on your new headers they look awesome in chrome.
Enjoy them!
 
W

WOT

Founding Member
Nov 26, 2000
2,817
0
46
Regina, Canada
May 1, 2005
#6
  • May 1, 2005
  • #6
tomabram said:
They are nice but the drawback on chrome is that they will rust. Price was ok, not great. I can get BBK ceramic coated equal length shorties for $250 delivered.
Click to expand...


Where from?
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
May 1, 2005
#7
  • May 1, 2005
  • #7
i can't tell from those pics, but it loks like you got a better set of those. my buddy & i had to clean up the welds on his alot before we put them on. our other buddy spent about 1 1/2 - 2 hours cleaning them up as we were taking a break from after taking the car apart
 
T

tomabram

Banned
Apr 1, 2005
66
0
0
May 1, 2005
#8
  • May 1, 2005
  • #8
stangman said:
i can't tell from those pics, but it loks like you got a better set of those. my buddy & i had to clean up the welds on his alot before we put them on. our other buddy spent about 1 1/2 - 2 hours cleaning them up as we were taking a break from after taking the car apart
Click to expand...
what was wrong with the welds? Mine were just bolted on with no problems. Was there excess weld?
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
May 1, 2005
#9
  • May 1, 2005
  • #9
tomabram said:
what was wrong with the welds? Mine were just bolted on with no problems. Was there excess weld?
Click to expand...


yeah there was alot of excess weld on his on the inside where the flange meets the tubes. we weren't doing anything better so we put a nice port job on them before we bolted them up
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
May 1, 2005
#10
  • May 1, 2005
  • #10
mto gt2000 said:
In the the current issue of mmff they put ford racing shortys on and gained 4-5 hp.
Click to expand...
and lost about same if notlittle more in mid-range.
Its cheap to buy, but expensive to install too...
 

BaconBits

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
84
0
0
May 8, 2005
#11
  • May 8, 2005
  • #11
But if you look at the MMFF artice those are Ford Racing shortys. They are NOT equal lenght by any means, even the design looks restrictive and are most likely the worst performing shorty out there. I would love to see some dyno numbers for the new BBK equal or "tuned" shorty headers. I've done searches but found nothing. Sure they won't come close to a long tube, but if it narrows the margin between the two, is easier to install, and I could keep my mid-pipe I would really consider it. I've seen ads by BBK that say 11-14, but I would like to see some real world numbers. 10whp would be enough for me the get them.
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
May 8, 2005
#12
  • May 8, 2005
  • #12
BaconBits said:
But if you look at the MMFF artice those are Ford Racing shortys. They are NOT equal lenght by any means, even the design looks restrictive and are most likely the worst performing shorty out there. I would love to see some dyno numbers for the new BBK equal or "tuned" shorty headers. I've done searches but found nothing. Sure they won't come close to a long tube, but if it narrows the margin between the two, is easier to install, and I could keep my mid-pipe I would really consider it. I've seen ads by BBK that say 11-14, but I would like to see some real world numbers. 10whp would be enough for me the get them.
Click to expand...




install is the EXACT same
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
May 8, 2005
#13
  • May 8, 2005
  • #13
Make sure to tell us how the install go's and how they preform.
 

BaconBits

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
84
0
0
May 8, 2005
#14
  • May 8, 2005
  • #14
stangman said:
install is the EXACT same
Click to expand...

Really? You have to drop your k-member to install shorty's?
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
May 8, 2005
#15
  • May 8, 2005
  • #15
BaconBits said:
Really? You have to drop your k-member to install shorty's?
Click to expand...
I belive so.
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
May 8, 2005
#16
  • May 8, 2005
  • #16
BaconBits said:
Really? You have to drop your k-member to install shorty's?
Click to expand...




some people just raise the engine a little bit, others drop the k-member. but installing them is the exact same for shorties or LT's. you don't have to do one or the other with the lt's or shorties. for me dropping the k-member is easier & thats the way i prefer to do it
 

BaconBits

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
84
0
0
May 8, 2005
#17
  • May 8, 2005
  • #17
That settles it for me. If you have to do the same basic install for shortys than for long tubes, it amazes me they sell any shortys at all. I'd still like to see a dyno of an equal length shorty to see the difference. Thanks for the info.
 

snkchmr

Active Member
Apr 18, 1999
2,671
3
49
Gretna Va
May 8, 2005
#18
  • May 8, 2005
  • #18
I put them on my Roush & Im happy with them
 
T

tomabram

Banned
Apr 1, 2005
66
0
0
May 8, 2005
#19
  • May 8, 2005
  • #19
BaconBits said:
That settles it for me. If you have to do the same basic install for shortys than for long tubes, it amazes me they sell any shortys at all. I'd still like to see a dyno of an equal length shorty to see the difference. Thanks for the info.
Click to expand...

Well money is always the factor. Shorties will be cheaper because you still use the stock mid pipes.
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
May 8, 2005
#20
  • May 8, 2005
  • #20
tomabram said:
Well money is always the factor. Shorties will be cheaper because you still use the stock mid pipes.
Click to expand...



true. but if someone doesn't want to buy a new mid-pipe they can have them cut to fit LT's. all you have to do is buy some ball & socket joints, have proper measurements taken, & then weld them on. viola, new mid pipe i did that on my last stang & it worked perfect
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
bbk shorty header to mid pipe gasket
  • randyyy
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
353
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 29, 2025
randyyy
R
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
725
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
576
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
F
Trouble Shooting Sudden Shift of AFR at low RPM
  • Farva_84
  • Jun 6, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
497
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 8, 2025
Farva_84
F
Fox 89’ GT 331 stroker, Trickflow upper/lower, TF#3 Cam, stuffed with forged goodies.
  • 08GT500
  • Nov 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
817
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 6, 2025
08GT500
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?