• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Ported heads or Cams?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kuestone
  • Start date Start date May 27, 2006
K

Kuestone

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
93
0
0
California
May 27, 2006
#1
  • May 27, 2006
  • #1
I am having my longblock built and I can only afford stage2 ported heads or stage2 cams. Car is going to be a blower application, so what do you guys think I should go with?

p.s. stage2 cams idle would be awesome, but if ported heads have better gains, then those. Also Iam in california so emissions friendly sniffer test. I think I can get my car detuned to pass the sniffer.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 28, 2006
#2
  • May 28, 2006
  • #2
Go with the ported heads. Blower cars love to breath. A lumpy idle is nice, but maximum airflow for the time being is what you want. Not to mention if later on down the road, you still want the cams, you don't have to pull the heads off of the engine to install them. The same can't be said if you do things the other way around.

That being said....if a blower is in the future, you might want to consider waiting until you're able to build the short block up while you're doing the heads. Tearing the engine down on three separate occasions (once for heads, once for cams and once for a built long block) just seems counterproductive and a real waste of time and money to me. Be patient and wait until you're able to afford to do them all at once!
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
May 28, 2006
#3
  • May 28, 2006
  • #3
+1 on the heads..

do the heads first then the cams, plus you may want to go with blower cams if your going blown, vt sells a couple of different blower cams.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
May 28, 2006
#4
  • May 28, 2006
  • #4
Both at the same time would be ideal...Rob a Bank, thats what i did....no really i did. It was my piggy bank but i still robbed it.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
May 28, 2006
#5
  • May 28, 2006
  • #5
Go with the ported heads like these guys said. Its far more effecient to just pull the valve covers, or the front cover (if wanting to degree them) when you do cams later, then pulling the cams out of the old heads, installing them in the new ones, then istalling the heads. LOTS of work.

But on a side note....contrary to what most think, some nice blower cams from VT SHOULD actually yield quite abit more power than ported heads alone. Reason being is that the stock cams dont provide enough lift/durration to take advantage of the extra flow. P&Pd heads seem to really shine near .550-.600 lift. I think the stockers are .500, and the ported heads arent ALOT better at that point.

Stock 2V heads with nice cams will darn near match stock MUCH MUCH better flowing 4V heads in blower applications. In testing with 2.2KBs, a ported head/blower cams 2V (225ish CFM head flow) will actually make more power (25+) than the 03-04 cobra DOHC engine (head flow of around 266 CFM). The head flow difference between the above is 41 CFM....about the difference between a stock 2V head and a ported one. (just an exaple of "head flow doesnt mean much without the proper cams to take advantage of it")

I have seen JUST cams gain over 100RWHP in higherend blower apps.
 
P

Pennywise2

Banned
May 16, 2006
1,379
1
0
May 28, 2006
#6
  • May 28, 2006
  • #6
+2 I would definitly do the ported heads first.Sometime in the future if you plan to do cams install the stage 2 cams that's the best way to go in my opnion.I would also look into the heads and cams at www.vtengines.com .
 
G

GT04Mustang

New Member
Apr 24, 2005
55
0
0
Savannah Ga
May 28, 2006
#7
  • May 28, 2006
  • #7
Pennywise2 said:
+2 I would definitly do the ported heads first.Sometime in the future if you plan to do cams install the stage 2 cams that's the best way to go in my opnion.I would also look into the heads and cams at www.vtengines.com .
Click to expand...


+3 for the heads first... I did them both ...but I have the engine out so y not! But deffinately to the pp first
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
699
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
771
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
690
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
712
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
R
Engine Evap and charcoal cannister leak
  • ryan1994stang
  • Mar 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
397
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 18, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?