radtexas said:Now that would be interesting to see how they would do that and what cars that would affect.
The days of the Mustang/Camaro wars would definitly be over unless they still build both or just leave it as is since the true winner is currently already in production.
www.tcc.com said:Yesterday's word that General Motors and Ford had held brief talks on possible cooperation were followed quickly by abject silence from the automakers, and a follow-up story noting that the talks went nowhere. Automotive News had reported in its Monday morning edition that the companies' CFOs, Fritz Henderson and Don Leclair, had met in July and talked briefly about working together on unspecified projects or areas of cooperation. By midday, the major media were running headlines about a possible merger. But by day's end, predictably, the news had settled out on the Wall Street Journal's version, which indicated that whatever talks took place were over and no more were planned. The Journal added that both companies are settled on pursuing their own turnaround plans independently, despite GM's ongoing talks with the Renault/Nissan alliance. Ford recently hired new CEO Alan Mulally to lead its second turnaround. The company is expected to lose up to $9 billion this year as it suffers the steep declines in the pickup and SUV markets.
This loaded statement is quite the can of worms.cowtown said:I dunno, I'd take the 3v 4.6L high tech motor over the old pushrods any day. Sure maybe not as big of #'s but it's a much more refined engine.
srothfuss said:It'll never happen.
Sharing ideas or technology, sure.
But shared management, never...
cowtown said:I dunno, I'd take the 3v 4.6L high tech motor over the old pushrods any day. Sure maybe not as big of #'s but it's a much more refined engine.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?